Russia v
Israel Juniors Round 9
Going into their Round 8 clash, Israel and Russia were lying seventh
and eighth respectively, well in contention but needing to add just
a little momentum to their challenge.
Board 2. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª A 10 3
© -
¨ K 9 8 4 3
§ 10 8 7 4 2 |
ª Q 9 7 5 2
© K 9 7 4
¨ 5
§ Q 9 5 |
|
ª 8 4
© A 10 6 5 3
¨ A Q J 7
§ K 3 |
|
ª K J 6
© Q J 8 2
¨ 10 6 2
§ A J 6 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
1© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
1© |
Pass |
3§(i) |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
(i) Limit heart raise
The auctions were effectively identical to identical contracts
but the outcomes of the final contract were quite different.
| |
Eldad Ginossar, Israel |
|
Against Denis Dobrin, Gilad Ofir led a diamond to the king and
ace. That looks to be a pretty good start for declarer but the play
went badly for him from here on in. Alas, the play record is rather
vague, however, it appears that Dobrin cashed the ©A next then played
a second heart and ducked when the queen appeared from South. As
the final result was down three for 150, I suspect that Dobrin will
be willing to buy us a beer or two in return for keeping the details
to ourselves.
At the other table, Dmitri Chelkak also led a diamond to the king
and ace. Eldad Ginossar led his low club at trick two and Chelkak
went in with the ace and exited with a second club to declarer's
king. That play surely marked South with a trump holding of some
promise so declarer's next move was to cash the ©A. From here it
was possible to take a diamond ruff, throw a spade on the §Q, and
lead through South to hold him to one trump trick to go with the
one defensive spade trick. Ginossar had ten tricks for +420 and
11 IMPs to Israel, a good start to the match for them.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª J 3 2
© K 10
¨ A Q 4 2
§ K 9 8 6 |
ª 10 6
© 6 2
¨ J 10 9 8 5 3
§ 7 4 2 |
|
ª A Q 9 7 4
© 9 8 5 4 3
¨ K 7
§ A |
|
ª K 8 5
© A Q J 7
¨ 6
§ Q J 10 5 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
2© |
Dble |
2ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
- |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When Chelkak opened with a Precision-style 2§, Alexander Klimashin
enquired with 2¨ then, when Ginossar's 2ª overcall came around to
him, cuebid to ask for a stopper. Chelkak showed one, ending the
auction. Ophir Reshef led the ten of spades and that was ducked
by everyone. A second spade went to the queen and king and, needing
to establish the clubs to have nine tricks, Chelkak was quickly
one down for –50.
Ofir's one-level opening allowed Dobrin to overcall 1ª at the other
table then to show his second suit over Ron Hoffman's reopening
double. That proved to be an error as now the doubling started and
Dobrin found himself declaring 2ª doubled. With the defenders able
to take a diamond ruff and lead trumps twice to nullify dummy's
ruffing potential, Dobrin was held to just four trump tricks and
the ace of clubs; down three for –800 and 13 IMPs to Israel.
Board 4. All Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª K J 10 9
© A Q J 7
¨ K Q J 6
§ 10 |
ª Q 8 4 3 2
© 8 2
¨ 4 3 2
§ Q 9 7 |
|
ª 7 5
© K 9 6 4 3
¨ A 8 5
§ A 6 3 |
|
ª A 6
© 10 5
¨ 10 9 7
§ K J 8 5 4 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
Pass |
1¨ |
1© |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
2§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Russia got on the scoreboard when a difference in opening bid led
to two very different outcomes. Where Hoffman opened with a natural
1¨ and Dobrin overcalled 1©, Ofir did not have enough to get involved
with the South cards. When 1© came back to Hoffman, he had so much
length and strength in hearts that it seemed clear to defend. Dobrin
was held to two aces and two trump tricks for 300, but that proved
to be a winning board for his side.
At the other table, Klimashin opened a Polish-style club and Chelkak
showed his clubs after the overcall. It was normal now for Klimashin
to jump to 3NT, looking at strong hearts and club shortage. The
heart lead was won by dummy's ten and a diamond led to the king,
ducked. The §10 was run to the queen and back came a heart for the
queen and king. On aheart return, Klimashin won and knocked out
the ¨A and eventually took the spade finesse for his ninth trick;
+600 and 7 IMPs to Russia.
Board 7. All Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª K Q 10
© 10 9 6 5 4 3
¨ A 6 2
§ 5 |
ª 8 5 3
© J 8 7
¨ J 9
§ A J 10 6 4 |
|
ª A J 4
© 2
¨ K Q 8 7 5 4
§ K 9 7 |
|
ª 9 7 6 2
© A K Q
¨ 10 3
§ Q 8 3 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
Both East/Wests subsided in 2¨ and both Norths balanced with 2©.
Now Ginossar found the fine bid of 2NT, competitive in the minors,
and got his side to 3§, while Dobrin went quietly and defended 2©.
Hoffman must have been impressed with the quality of Ofir's heart
support and he made nine tricks without breaking sweat, losing just
a club, a diamond and two spades for +140.
Three Clubs proved to be an equally comfortable contract after
the lead of the ªK, ducked. Klimashin continued with the ª10 but
Reshef was not to be put off the finesse and put in the jack. He
played a diamond to the jack and, when that held, a second diamond
to the ace. The contract was not in danger from here but a slight
defensive slip gave Reshef an overtrick for +130 and 7 IMPs to Israel.
Board 11. None Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 9 7 6 5 3
© 10 4 3
¨ 6 5
§ 9 5 4 |
ª K J 4
© K 9 7 6
¨ A 10 7
§ K 8 3 § A 10 6 2 |
|
ª 8
© A J 8 5
¨ K Q 9 2
§ A 10 6 2 |
|
ª A Q 10 2
© Q 2
¨ J 8 4 3
§ Q J 7 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
1¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
1© |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
- |
1§ |
Dble |
2ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
Both Wests doubled South's choice of opening bid for take-out.
I don't understand why Dobrin responded only 1© and, I suspect,
neither did Evgeni Rudakov, as he made a normal pass and left Dobrin
to play there. When Dobrin dropped the ©Q, not too taxing after
he counted the missing high cards, he had eleven tricks for an inadeqaute
looking +200.
At the other table Klimashin made a weak jump shift over the opposing
double, Well, it certainly qualifies as weak, I suppose, but perhaps
not well-advised. Ginossar doubled to show values and Reshef passed
for penalties. Despite finding strong four-card spade support in
dummy, Klimashin had to lose two tricks in each suit for down three
and 500. I guess that would have been fairly painless had his East/West
pair bid the heart game at the other table. As it was, Israel had
another 7 IMPs.
Board 15. N/S Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª A 6 3
© A K
¨ A 10 4 2
§ Q 10 6 2 |
ª J 9 8 4
© J 8 4 2
¨ 9
§ K J 9 5 |
|
ª Q 10 7
© 7 5 3
¨ Q J 6 3
§ A 8 4 |
|
ª K 5 2
© Q 10 9 6
¨ K 8 7 5
§ 7 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Hoffman had an easy ride in 3NT as, not having bid the suit, he
received a low diamond lead to his ten. He could play on clubs to
establish his ninth trick; +600.
Klimashin had not bid diamonds either, but was known to hold minor-suit
length for his 2¨ response to Stayman. That was sufficient to persuade
Ginossar to lead a passive heart and leave declarer to find his
own tricks. When Klimashin's play to trick two was a low diamond
to dummy's king, followed by a second diamond, he was in big trouble
and there was no way to recover. Klimashin was down two for 200
and 13 IMPs to Israel.
That ended the scoring at 60-16 IMPs to Israel, converting to
24-6 VPs, but there were a couple of slam hands still to come.
Board 17. None Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª A K Q 6 5
© A 7
¨ K 10 8
§ 10 9 7 |
ª 7 4 2
© Q J 8 6 2
¨ 7 6 5
§ Q 2 |
|
ª J 10 9 8 3
© K 10
¨ 3
§ A 6 5 4 3 |
|
ª -
© 9 5 4 3
¨ A Q J 9 4 2
§ K J 8 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
Both North/South pairs did well to bid the decent slam on this
one. When Hoffman used RKCB, Ofir showed his key cards but then
went on over the sign off, liking his void and good trumps. At the
other table it was North, Klimashin, who bid the slam after getting
the crucial club cuebid out of his partner.
Reshef led a heart against Chelkak so declarer won and played the
three top spades to discard all his clubs, after which he just gave
up a heart. Two hearts were ruffed in dummy and he had twelve tricks
for +920.
Rudakov led the §2 against Ofir. That was an interesting idea but
it proved to be no more effective. Dobrin won the §A and returned
the suit but Ofir was not prepared to finesse at this point in the
hand – not after a low club lead which suggested an honour
on his left. He went up with the king and the fall of the queen
made everything very easy, the hearts goin gaway on the top spades
after drawing trumps; +920 and a flat board.
Had the §Q not fallen under the king, Ofir would have required
an even spade break to give four discards from his hand. I wonder
what would have happened had Rudakov held, say, §Q6 instead of §Q2
– seeing a high club spot lead, would Ofir have finessed at
trick two, thinking that a better chance than the four-four spade
split?
Board 18. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª K 8 3
© 9
¨ 9 8 6 5 3
§ A Q J 7 |
ª A 7 6 5
© K Q J 10 6 3
¨ 7 4
§ 2 |
|
ª 10 9
© A 8 7 5
¨ A K Q J
§ K 10 9 |
|
ª Q J 4 2
© 4 2
¨ 10 2
§ 8 6 5 4 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rudakov |
Hoffman |
Dobrin |
Ofir |
- |
- |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Klimashin |
Ginossar |
Chelkak |
- |
- |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
|
This time it was the rurn of the East/West pairs to bid a very
good slam. In theory, it is important to get the contract played
by East. Now the §K is protected. If the defence takes its club
trick then the §K and the diamonds provide three discards for West's
spades. If the defence does not take the club trick, declarer simply
throws West's club on the diamonds then gives up a spade and ruffs
a spade. While it was purely fortuitous that the response to RKCB
placed East as declarer, the Russians were therefore in the top
spot, while the Israelis were in a contract that could have been
failing on a different lie of the cards. Today there was no problem,
of course, and both declarers made twelve tricks in comfort.
So a good finish to the match with all four pairs bidding good
slams and bringing them home.
|