| Sweden v 
              Netherlands – Girls Round 7  Sweden and Netherlands were lying joint-third after six rounds 
              of the Girls Championship, making their Round 7 meeting absolutely 
              crucial to their medal hopes. The match started quietly but we did 
              not have to wait very long for the first big swing. 
| Board 4. All Vul. Dealer West. |  
|  | ª 10 4 3 2 © 7 5 3
 ¨ A Q J 8
 § A 3
 |  ª 8 6 © 10 8 6 4 2
 ¨ 4
 § K Q 8 6 5
 |  | ª J 7 © A K Q J 9
 ¨ K 7
 § J 10 9 7
 | 
|  | ª A K Q 9 5 © -
 ¨ 10 9 6 5 3 2
 § 4 2
 |  
             
               
                | Closed Room |   
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |   
                | 2© | Pass | 4© | All Pass |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| Pass | 1¨ | 1© | 2¨ |  
| 4© | Pass | Pass | 4ª |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  
             
              For Sweden, Sandra Rimstedt had a two-suited 2© opening available 
              to her and used it. When sister, Cecilia raised to 4© Rosalien Barendrecht 
              was in a very awakward position as South. Her distribution clearly 
              suggested that she should bid but her lack of high cards, allied 
              to the fact that she was vulnerable, made that look to be very dangerous. 
              She elected to pass and the Swedes had stolen the pot. Astrid Dekker 
              led a spade and, after cashing two of those, Baerndrecht switched 
              to a club for the king and ace. Dekker cashed the ¨A for down one; 
              –100.
                |  |  |  
                | Jenny Ryman, Sweden |  |   Meike Wortel did not have a two-suited opening in her bag so passed. 
              Emma Sjoberg opened the North hand 1¨ and now it didn't matter how 
              much East/West competed, and they did get up to 4©, Jenny Ryman 
              was always going to bid up to game with the South cards. She began 
              with an inverted diamond raise then showed the spades at her second 
              trun and was left to play the spade game. After the singleton diamond 
              lead from Wortel, Ryman won the ace, drew trumps and conceded a 
              diamond; twelve tricks for +680 and 11 IMPs to Sweden. 
| Board 7. All Vul. Dealer South. |  
|  | ª Q 7 5 4 © 3
 ¨ A 8 5
 § A K Q 9 2
 |  ª K J 9 © A Q 6 5 4
 ¨ K Q 9
 § J 7
 |  | ª 10 6 2 © K J 9 2
 ¨ J 6 3
 § 8 5 4
 | 
|  | ª A 8 3 © 10 8 7
 ¨ 10 7 4 2
 § 10 6 3
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
                | - | - | - | Pass |  
| 1NT | Dble | All Pass |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| - | - | - | Pass |  
| 1NT | Dble | Pass | 2§ |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  Though both Norths doubled the strong no trump opening, the doubles 
              did not have the same meanings. Dekker's double was natural, penalty, and it was normal for Barendrecht, 
              looking at an ace and a balanced hand, to pass it. Dekker cashed 
              five rounds of clubs then switched to a spade to the ace and a spade 
              was returned to declarer's king. Sandra Rimstedt had not come down 
              to the right eight cards after the run of the clubs, or she would 
              have got out for one down, of course. Having thrown a heart earleir, 
              she had to concede a diamond and a spade for down two; –500.  Sjoberg's double was take-out, showing four cards in a major plus 
              a longer minor. It was normal for Ryman to bid 2§ and for Sjoberg 
              to let her play there. With clubs three-two and the spades producing 
              three tricks, 2§ was a very comfortable contract and Sjoberg scored 
              nine tricks for +110, but 9 IMPs to Netherlands. 
| Board 10. All Vul. Dealer East. |  
|  | ª A 2 © A Q 6 5
 ¨ J 9 2
 § K 9 7 3
 |  ª 10 9 4 3 © K 9
 ¨ K 10 8 6
 § A 10 8
 |  | ª K J 7 6 © 10 8 7 4 3
 ¨ A Q 5
 § 4
 | 
|  | ª Q 8 5 © J 2
 ¨ 7 4 3
 § Q J 6 5 2
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| - | - | Pass | Pass |  
| Pass | 1NT | 2¨ | Pass |  
| 2ª | All Pass |  |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
                | - | - | Pass | Pass |  
| Pass | 1NT | All Pass |  |  Both Norths opened 1NT and the vulnerability convinced Marion Michielsen 
              to keep quiet with the East cards while Cecilia Rimstedt overcalled 
              to show spades and another, getting her side to 2ª. This time it 
              was right to compete.  Michielsen led a spade against 1NT. Sjoberg won dummy's queen 
              and knocked out the §A. The defence took the diamonds then switched 
              to spades and Sjoberg ran for home; +90.  Dekker led a club against 2ª. Sandra Rimstedt won and passed the 
              ª10 to the queen. The heart jack was covered by king and ace and 
              Dekker switched to a diamond. Declarer won and played a spade to 
              the ace and had the rest; +140 and 6 IMPs to Sweden. 
| Board 12. N/S Vul. Dealer West. |  
|  | ª K 9 8 3 2 © K
 ¨ A 10
 § 7 6 5 4 2
 |  ª A 7 5 4 © A 8 6 4 2
 ¨ J 6 4
 § A
 |  | ª Q J 6 © Q J 10 7 5 3
 ¨ K 7 3
 § 10
 | 
|  | ª 10 © 9
 ¨ Q 9 8 5 2
 § K Q J 9 8 3
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| 1© | 1ª | 4© | 4NT |  
| Pass | 5§ | 5© | Pass |  
| Pass | Dble | All Pass |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| 1© | 1ª | 2NT | 3§ |  
| Pass | 4ª | 5© | Dble |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  Two different routes to the same spot. North/South would have lost 
              a trick in each suit had they played 5§ doubled (I assume that Sjoberg/Ryman 
              would not have stayed in 4ª had it been doubled).  Wortel received a low spade lead and won dummy's queen. She ran 
              the ©Q at trick two and that lost to the king. Back came a second 
              spade to dummy's jack but there were two diamonds to be lost for 
              down one; –100.  Rimstedt recieved the lead of ace and another diamond. She rose 
              with dummy's king and led the ©Q, running it to the bare king. She 
              got aspade switch now and won dummy's queen. Declarer crossed to 
              hand with the §A to lead a spade towards the jack so had a discard 
              for dummy's third diamond; down one for 100 and a flat board.Had either declarer picked the trump suit correctly, she could then 
              have made the contract by leading twice towards the ªQJ to establish 
              three spade tricks including the ace for a discard of dummy's third 
              diamond.
 
| Board 15. N/S Vul. Dealer South. |  
|  | ª 9 6 © 10 6 3
 ¨ A K 7 6 3
 § J 9 6
 |  ª J 8 7 3 © Q 9 8 7 5 4
 ¨ -
 § A 4 2
 |  | ª K Q 10 5 4 2 © -
 ¨ 9 5 2
 § Q 10 5 3
 | 
|  | ª A © A K J 2
 ¨ Q J 10 8 4
 § K 8 7
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| - | - | - | 1¨ |  
| 2© | 3¨ | Pass | 3NT |  
| Pass | Pass | 4ª | Dble |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| - | - | - | 1§ |  
| 2© | 3¨ | Pass | 3© |  
| Pass | 4¨ | Pass | 4© |  
| Pass | 5¨ | Pass | 6¨ |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  Barendrecht opened 1¨, caught a diamond raise from partner and 
              tried 3NT, a contract that would have succeeded except on a spade 
              lead. But Cecilia saved in 4ª and now Barendrecht doubled on the 
              weight of high cards. Cecilia found a wonderful dummy and a winning 
              club view left her with just a spade and a club to lose; +690.  Ryman opened with a strong club and found he rpartner able to 
              show a positive in her own five-card suit. Ryman cuebid and went 
              on to slam facing a sign-off. Six Diamonds was hopeless, particularly 
              with the ©Q marked offside on the auction. Sjoberg won the spade 
              lead, drew trumps and eliminated spades, but eventually lost two 
              clubs and a heart for down two; –200 but still 10 IMPs to 
              Sweden. Ryman/Sjoberg must have been impressed with that one when 
              they scored up! 
| Board 16. E/W Vul. Dealer West. |  
|  | ª 8 6 3 © 8 6 2
 ¨ J 10 8
 § 8 7 5 3
 |  ª A Q J 9 5 © 9 4
 ¨ K 9 4
 § 10 4 2
 |  | ª K 4 2 © K 10 7 3
 ¨ A 5 2
 § A Q 6
 | 
|  | ª 10 7 © A Q J 5
 ¨ Q 7 6 3
 § K J 9
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| Pass | Pass | 1NT | Pass |  
| 2© | Pass | 3ª | Pass |  
| 4ª | All Pass |  |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| Pass | Pass | 1NT | Pass |  
| 2© | Pass | 2ª | Pass |  
| 3NT | All Pass |  |  |  Cecilia broke the transfer, which seems over-aggressive even when 
              holding a maximum for her 14-16 no trump. That ensured that hse 
              would play 4ª rather than the superior 3NT. Barendrecht led a trump 
              and Cecilia won, drew the rest of the missing trumps and ran the 
              ©9 to the jack. Back came a diamond which she won in dummy to play 
              a heart to the ten and queen. Again a diamond was returned and there 
              was no way home; down one for –100. There is a winning line but declarer has to watch her entries. 
              At the end she could have pinned the ©8 by leading her king, but 
              then would have only the §A as an entry to cash the established 
              ©7, and using the §A breaks up a necessary endplay. Suppose that 
              declarer judges South to have most of the missing high cards for 
              her trump lead. Declarer wins trick one in dummy and runs the ©9, 
              wins the return in dummy and takes the second heart finesse. Now 
              she can win the next lead in hand to lead the ©K and pin the eight. 
              There is an entry to hand to cash the ©7 after drawing trumps, throwing 
              a diamond, of course. Now declarer ruffs her diamond in dummy and 
              takes the club finesse at trick eleven. South wins but is endplayed 
              to lead away from the §J. It is assumed that South threw a diamond 
              on the third round of clubs to keep her club holding intact. If 
              not, declarer can make without an endplay because the §J will fall 
              under the ace. Meanwhile, Wortel transferred then jumped to 3NT and Michielsen 
              judged that her 4-3-3-3 shape might make 3NT easier than 4ª. Right 
              she was. The lead was a safe spade and declarer won in dummy to 
              play a heart to her king. that lost to the ace and the ©Q and ©J 
              were cashed; +600 and 12 IMPs to Netherlands. 
| Board 17. None Vul. Dealer North. |  
|  | ª A J 5 2 © A K J 9 8 7 2
 ¨ 8
 § 9
 |  ª 9 © Q 5 3
 ¨ Q 9 7 5 3 2
 § 10 8 4
 |  | ª Q 8 © 4
 ¨ A K
 § K Q J 7 6 5 3 2
 | 
|  | ª K 10 7 6 4 3 © 10 6
 ¨ J 10 6 4
 § A
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| - | 1© | 2§ | 2ª |  
| Pass | 4NT | 5§ | Pass |  
| Pass | 5¨ | Dble | Pass |  
| Pass | 5ª | All Pass |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
| - | 1© | 2§ | 2ª |  
| 3§ | 4§ | 5§ | 5ª |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  If I had to pick a contract after my partner had bid 2ª over the 
              2§ overcall, I guess I would pick 6ª. But, of course, North does 
              not have to pick a contract, she can ask some questions of South.  Sjoberg chose to cuebid 4§ then trust partner's judgement when 
              she bid 5ª over 5§ – presumably the ¨A was missing when Ryman 
              didn't show it, and who could tell about the §A? The club lead meant 
              all thirteen tricks for +510. Dekker appears to have asked for key cards but not to have liked 
              the response – meaning that either she was given the wrong 
              response, or she can't count, as clearly two key cards is sufficient 
              to bid the small slam. No doubt the partnership knows who was wrong 
              and will not make the same mistake again. Here the lead was a diamond, 
              meaning only twelve tricks for +480 so 1 IMP to Sweden. For what it is worth, I like 4NT a lot better than 4§ from North, 
              but I would hope to then have a system to cope with East's 5§ bid 
              so that I would know how many key cards partner holds. 
| Board 18. N/S Vul. Dealer East. |  
|  | ª Q 8 7 5 © Q 10 7 4
 ¨ -
 § J 10 9 4 2
 |  ª K 3 © 9
 ¨ J 9 8 5 3
 § A K Q 8 6
 |  | ª J 9 6 4 © J 6 3 2
 ¨ Q 7 6 4
 § 7
 | 
|  | ª A 10 2 © A K 8 5
 ¨ A K 10 2
 § 5 3
 |  
| Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| S Rimstedt | Dekker | C Rimstedt | Barendrecht |  
| - | - | Pass | 1¨ |  
| 2§ | Pass | Pass | Dble |  
| Pass | 2© | Pass | Pass |  
| 3§ | Dble | All Pass |  |  
| Open Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Wortel | Sjoberg | Michielsen | Ryman |  
                | - | - | 2© | Dble |  
| 2ª | Pass | Pass | Dble |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  This was horrible. I would have thought that it was normal for 
              North to pass her partner's reopening double when looking at §J10942. 
              Dekker was a very lucky girl when she instead bid 2©, only to now 
              get an opportunity to double 3§. There is no excuse for Sandra's 
              3§ bid. Holding only a five-card suit, she has no reason at all 
              to bid again and the double merely saw justice done.  Dekker led the §J and Sandra won and led her heart. Dekker won 
              the queen and switched to a low spade to her partner's ace. Back 
              came a club, which declarer won. Sandra cashed the ªK before playing 
              a diamond to the queen and king. From here she was allowed ruffs 
              with both her small trumps so got out for down three; –500.  Michielsen had an opening to show a weak hand with at least four-four 
              in the majors – just what Wortel wanted to here, particularly 
              when Ryman started with a double. The only positive thing about 
              this situation, compared to that at the other table, was that South 
              had no laid claim to the diamond suit – the one where East/West 
              belong. But it is very tough to get to diamonds after this start 
              and Wortel just gave preference to spades, trying to look as confident 
              as she could. Alas, she did not look confident enough, because Ryman 
              doubled again and that ended the auction. Sjoberg led the §J and 
              Wortel won and cashed s econd club, throwing a heart from dummy. 
              She then played a diamond to the queen and king and Ryman cashed 
              a second diamond then gave her partner a diamond ruff. It was difficult 
              for Ryman to appreciate that declarer had only two trumps, but this 
              line of defence actually helped Wortel a little. Still, she could 
              only scramble five tricks and that meant –500 and just another 
              dull push. Sweden ended up with a narrow victory, 38-32 IMPs or 16-14 VPs, 
              giving them third place overnight, 2 VPs clear of Netherlands but 
              quite a way behind the two leaders. |