Italy v
Hungary – Juniors Round 13
After 12 rounds, World champions Italy were lying in fourth place
in the Juniors Championship, while Hungary were surprising some
people with their strong showing as they were currently in the lead.
This would be a serious test of the Hungarians' credentials. First,
however, we take a look at the first board of the vugraph encounter
between France and Poland, two other teams currently in
Board 1. None Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª
Q J ©
8 6 3 2 ¨
K J 10 8 5 §
8 2 |
ª
A 10 9 6 ©
J 5 ¨ A 6 3
§ 6 5 4 3 |
|
ª
- ©
K Q 9 4 ¨ 9
4 2 § A K
Q J 10 9 |
|
ª
K 8 7 5 4 3 2 ©
A 10 7 ¨
Q 7 § 7 |
the qualifying positions.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kotorowicz |
J Grenthe |
Kalita |
G Grenthe |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
3ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
In the other room, Bessis/de Tessieres for France bid to 3NT on
the East/West cards and made +460 by winning the first spade and
knocking out the heart while the spades were still blocked.
Krzysztof Kotorowicz bid very aggressively in the auction above
to get Jacek Kalita to play the club slam. One Club was Polish,
various handtypes, and the reopening double confirmed the strong
artificial variety. You or I would choose between a penalty pass
and 3NT with the West cards, but not Kotorowicz, he cuebid 4ª then,
when partner could not bid slam himself, raised 5§ to 6§! Scarey,
but successful. It takes a diamond lead to break it for certain,
of course, thanks to the fall of the ©10 – though it is likely
that declarer will finesse the ©9 on the second round, particularly
attractive after South's 3ª overcall, and fail anyway. But Grenthe
cashed the ace of hearts at trick one and now the slam was easy;
+920 and 10 IMPs to Poland.
That rather set the tone for the match, with Poland completely
dominant and winning by a surprising 97-26 IMPs, 25-2 VPs, to go
to the top of the table.
Now, let us concentrate on our main match.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª -
© K J 7 5
¨ Q 9 6
§ K Q 9 7 4 2 |
ª Q J 8 3
© A 6
¨ A 7 5 3
§ J 8 5 |
|
ª A K 7 6 5 4
© Q 9 8
¨ 4
§ A 10 6 |
|
ª 10 9 2
© 10 4 3 2
¨ K J 10 8 2
§ 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
- |
- |
2¨ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Dble |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5ª |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
With no defence against a spade contract, Mate Mraz leaped all
the way to game when Balazs Szegedi could open with a weak 2¨ bid.
Stelio di Bello doubled for take-out and brother Furio passed, of
course, looking at a blanced hand with four trumps. Szegedi must
have been disappointed to find that he was at the five level with
only an eight-card trump fit – of course, this was partly
his fault as he was not obliged to open with only five cards (though
I expect that i would do so at this vulnerability).
Furio led the ªQ, ruffed in dummy, and Szegedi played the §K to
Stelio's ace. He was forced to ruff another spade and now played
§Q for a spade pitch then a diamond, Furio taking the ace and forcing
him with another spade. The four-one diamond split meant that Szegedi
did not have time to establish heart tricks. He drew three rounds
of trumps then played a heart to the jack and queen, and was held
to his trump winners; four down for –800.
Csaba Szabo responded 2ª to Andras Riesz's Forcing Stayman response
to the weak no trump opening and that excited Riesz, who splintered
then asked for key cards over the heart cuebid. It looks a sthough
East did a little too much here and the final contract was hopeless.
There was a heart and a club to lose for down one; –100 and
14 IMPs to Italy.
Board 5. N/S Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª 8 2
© A 10 8 7 6 2
¨ 10 9 4 3
§ 2 |
ª A 6
© K J
¨ -
§ A Q J 9 8 6 5 4 3 |
|
ª J 9 7 5 4
© Q 3
¨ A Q J 6
§ K 10 |
|
ª K Q 10 3
© 9 5 4
¨ K 8 7 5 2
§ 7 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
5ª |
Pass |
7§ |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
2© |
2ª |
3© |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
The Hungarian East/West pair bid another small slam but this time
it was the right thing to do, and they managed it in the face of
a pre-emptive opening and raise from Lo Presti and Sbarigia. Szabo's
leap to 6§ was the practical bid, as he was always going to have
trouble in exploring the hand properly; +920.
I am not sufficiently familiar with the di Bello brothers' methods
to be able to tell you what went wrong at the other table. Obviously,
something did, and they must have been very disappointed to bid
to a grand slam off an ace when put under no pressure. Seven Clubs
was down one, of course, for –50 and 14 IMPs back to Hungary.
Board 6. E/W Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª 10 8 5 4 2
© 4 3
¨ 9 3
§ K 10 6 5 |
ª K 6 3
© A J 10 9 5
¨ A 10 8 6
§ 8 |
|
ª A Q J 9 7
© 2
¨ Q J 5 4 2
§ 4 3 |
|
ª -
© K Q 8 7 6
¨ K 7
§ A Q J 9 7 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
- |
1ª |
2ª |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
4§ |
4ª |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
- |
1ª |
2ª |
3§ |
5§ |
Pass |
Pass |
5ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Szeegedi showed hearts and a minor and Furio showed a constructive
spade raise with his 3© cuebid. He went on to game at his next turn
but respected stelio's double of the 5§ save. Furio led his trump
and, though there were only three top losers, the heart stack meant
that Sgedi had to lose a second trick in thta suit so was down two
for 300.
|
|
|
Fabio Lo Presti, Italy |
Matteo Sbarigia showed hearts and clubs, and Szabo cuebid 3§ to
show the spade raise. When Fabio Lo Presti jumped straight to 5§,
Szabo took the push to 5ª, which ended the auction. Sbarigia cashed
the ace of clubs then switched to the ¨7. Seeing an easy way home
on any but the actual trump division, Riesz did not want to risk
the diamond finesse and a possible ruff, so rose with the ¨A, played
a spade to the jack, and found that he could not recover. He could
knock out the ¨K, but could not then both take the required club
ruff and pick up the trumps. Sbarigia's nice switch at trick two
had beaten the contract; down one for –100 and 9 IMPs to Italy,
who led in the match by 30-16 IMPs after five boards.
Five Spades can only be beaten if, as above, declarer can be persuaded
not to take the diamond finesse, but what about 5¨? We saw the answer
to that one in the vugraph match between Poland and France.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kotorowicz |
J Grenthe |
Kalita |
G Grenthe |
- |
- |
2ª |
4§ |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Kalita's 2ª opening showed a weak two-suiter with spades and a
minor. When Guillaume Grenthe overcalled 4§, Leaping Michaels, to
show hearts and clubs, Kotorowicz went quietly until Jerome Grenthe
raised to game, then he saved in 5¨. Guillaume doubled that but
a heart lead was quite painless for declarer, who could take three
heart ruffs in dummy, pick up the trumps along the way, and cash
out the spades for thirteen tricks; +1150.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Tessieres |
Araskiewicz |
O Bessis |
Buras |
- |
- |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
4§ |
4ª |
5§ |
Pass |
Pass |
5¨ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
French players generally have a conservative opening style and
the East cards did not meet Bessis' s requirements for a 1ª opening,
2ª being a single-suited weak bid. He passed but soon had the opportunity
to show his two-suiter by way of a cuebid when 1© was passed round
to him. Now de Tessiers followed a very revealing sequence, first
trying 4ª then 5¨ over 5§. That pretty well marked Krzysztof Buras
with a spade void and Konrad Araskiewicz trusted his opponents'
bidding sufficiently to firstly double then lead a spade for his
partner to ruff. And the spade he led was the two, suit preference.
Buras duly underled his §A at trick two and received a second ruff
so an otherwise cold contract had been defeated by a trick. Very
nicely defended and +200 to Poland, giving them 16 IMPs.
Board 7. All Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª A Q 7 3
© J
¨ J 10 4
§ J 10 9 3 2 |
ª K J 10 8
© 8 6 5
¨ Q 7 3
§ A K 6 |
|
ª 6 4 2
© Q 9 7 2
¨ 9 6 5 2
§ Q 8 |
|
ª 9 5
© A K 10 4 3
¨ A K 8
§ 7 5 4 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
- |
- |
1© |
Dble |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
- |
- |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balasz Szegedi, Hungary |
Szegedi upgraded the South hand slightly to rebid 1NT, showing
15+, and Mraz just raised him to game. At the other table, Sbarigia
preferred to rebid 2¨ and was left to play there, though his 1NT
rebid would have shown less than 15 and there seems no strong reason
to rebid in a three-card suit.
Szabo cashed a top club then switched to a trump against 2¨. Sbarigia
won dummy's ten and crossed to hand with a heart to take the spade
finesse. From here it was possible to cash his winners and crossruff
to make nine tricks for +110.
The destination of the IMPs would be decided by the outcome of
the rather optimistic 3NT contract in the Closed Room. Furio cashed
the ace of clubs and switched to a spade for dummy's queen. The
©J was coveed by queen and ace and Szegedi ducked a heart to Stelio's
seven. Stelio cashed the §Q then switched back to spades, dummy
winning the ace. Now Szegedi played a diamond to the ace and cashed
the diamonds. At the end he could throw Furio in with the third
club to lead away from the queen of diamonds. Nicely done for a
great +600 and 10 IMPs to Hungary.
The Hungarians gained a partscore swing on the next deal to move
into the lead by 31-30 then consolidated the lead on this next one:
Board 9. E/W Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª K 9 5
© 9 7 5
¨ K J 10 7
§ Q J 10 |
ª A 4 3 2
© K 10 3
¨ A 9 6 3 2
§ K |
|
ª Q J 7 6
© A J 8
¨ Q 8 5
§ 7 4 3 |
|
ª 10 8
© Q 6 4 2
¨ 4
§ A 9 8 6 5 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
2§ |
2ª |
3§ |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
Sgedi's 3§ pre-empt could not be described as 'down the middle',
but anything goes in third seat at this vulnerability, and he bought
a pretty decent dummy whe nobody had anything to say. Furio started
with a sneaky low diamond and Szegedi inevitably got that wrong,
the ten losing to the queen. Stelio switched to the queen of spades
to Furio's ace and a second spade was won in dummy with the king.
Szegedi took the trump finesse now and when it lost Furio switched
to a low heart. The brothers took their three heart tricks so that
was down two for –100.
Sbarigia was not willing to abuse the normal requirements for a
three-level opening to quite this extent, even in third seat at
favourbale vulnerability, so Szabo/Riesz were left to explore the
East/West cards to their hearts' content, eventually alighting in
4ª. Sbargia cashed the ace of clubs then switched to a low heart,
which did Riesz no harm at all. He could ruff a club, cross back
to hand with a heart and ruff the last club before playing ace and
another trump; +620 and 11 IMPs to Hungary.
Board 12. N/S Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª 9 7 6 5 3
© 7 5
¨ A J
§ Q 5 3 2 |
ª K
© K 9 8 4 3 2
¨ 10 4 3
§ 8 6 4 |
|
ª 10 4 2
© A Q 6
¨ Q 9 8 5
§ J 9 7 |
|
ª A Q J 8
© J 10
¨ K 7 6 2
§ A K 10 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
3© |
3ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
2© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Both Wests opened with a weak 2©. Stelio's 2ª response was conventional
but Furio had a bad hand and could only go back to 3©. Riesz might
have pre-empted by raising to 3© but chose to go quietly. He proved
to have chosen the winning tactic, because against him North/South
stopped in 3ª, while Stelio's more active approach saw his opponents
get to the spade game. Even though both declarers lost to the bare
king of trumps, they had ten tricks; +170 for Lo Presti, but +620
and 10 IMPs for Mraz.
Board 18. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª K 9 5 4
© 3 2
¨ Q J 10 8
§ 9 8 7 |
ª 10 7
© A J 9 7 6 4
¨ K 7 6
§ J 2 |
|
ª A J 8
© K Q
¨ A 9 2
§ A Q 6 5 4 |
|
ª Q 6 3 2
© 10 8 5
¨ 5 4 3
§ K 10 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
- |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
- |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6NT |
All Pass |
Both Easts opened 2NT and both Wests transferred. Stelio showed
a lack of interest in hearts but Furio went back to the security
of his six-card suit. That may have been a mild slam try but, if
so, Stelio was not interested. Four Hearts made twelve tricks after
a diamond lead; +480.
Riesz simply completed the transfer and Szabo's 4© continuation
was for sure a non-forcing slam try. Riesz had very good controls
and two strong trumps so asked for key cards, then blasted a slam
when he liked the reply. A spade lead would beat 6NT but that is
not so easy to find. After the atcual passive heart lead, Riesz
cashed the second heart then led towards the §J and soon had twelve
tricks for +990 and 11 IMPs.
Hungary now led by 74-42 and were in threatening to put a serious
dent in Italian ambitions for these Championships. However, Italy
regained some ground on the next deal.
Board 19. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª Q 3
© 3
¨ A 10 9 6 3
§ K 6 5 4 2 |
ª J 5
© Q J 10 5 4
¨ 5 4 2
§ A Q 3 |
|
ª A 9 7 6
© K 9 8 7 6
¨ K Q 7
§ 9 |
|
ª K 10 8 4 2
© A 2
¨ J 8
§ J 10 8 7 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
F di Bello |
Mraz |
S di Bello |
Szegedi |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
3¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Szabo |
Lo Presti |
Riesz |
Sbarigia |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
1© |
1ª |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Dble |
3© |
All Pass |
|
|
Mraz found another imaginative Hungarian third-seat pre-empt. When
Stelio was prepared to double for take-out, not worrying that he
held length in the wrong minor when five-four in the majors, it
was clear for Furio to jump to the heart game. Had the diamond pre-empt
been for real, a diamond ruff would hav edefeated this contract
quite easily, but on the atual layout it takes a low diamond lead
to defeat the agme, preserving communications so that South can
win the ©A and get his partner in to give the ruff – hardly
a plausible defence. Mraz actually led a club at trick one and Furio
won the queen then playe don trumps for +620.
In the other room, Lo Presti opened light in third seat but at
the on elevel. When Riesz overcalled 1©, Szabo followed an invitational
sequence and Riesz judged not to bid the game. Perhaps Riesz should
have gone on, as game is excellent on the auction, and he does have
some distribution plus a well-positioned diamond holding. Or perhaps
he felt that West could have made a stronger try after 2© got doubled
if game was to be good? Anyway, the Hungarians stopped in 3© and
made the same ten tricks for +170 but 10 IMPs to Italy.
Hungary won the match by 74-53 IMPs, converting to 19-11 VPs, and
were lying second, just behind Poland, while Italy were fourth and
still well in contention. |