Austria
v Czech Republic – Schools Round 1
We have not given much coverage as yet to the host nation, Czech
Republic. Accordingly, we take a look at their Schools team in the
opening round against Austria. The Austrian team is captained by
Iris Grumm, who has just become part of the first team ever to win
a European Girls Team Championship. We should get an early idea
as to the likliehood of her managing an unlikely double by also
winning the Schools event, albeit as an npc.
Board 1. None Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª Q 6 3
© Q 10 6
¨ A Q 7 4
§ 8 7 6 |
ª A K
© J 9 2
¨ 10 8 3 2
§ K 10 5 4 |
|
ª 9
© 8 7 4 3
¨ K J 9 6 5
§ Q J 3 |
|
ª J 10 8 7 5 4 2
© A K 5
¨ -
§ A 9 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markus Hopfler, Austria |
Austria were faster out of their blocks, bidding a cold game missed at the other
table. For Czech Republic, Pavla Hoderova simply repeated her long
spade suit opposite Michal Kopecky's 2¨
response – not the suit that Hoderova would have wanted to here
from partner. Kopecky was too balanced to go on over 2ª
so the game was missed; +170.
Dominik Haidinger raised the 1ª opening to 2ª and, with such promising
distribution, Markus Hopfler took a shot at game, which proved to
be quite cold even though 6 out of 10 HCP in dummy were facing the
void; +420 and 6 IMPs to Austria.
Board 2. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª A 9 3 2
© A J 8
¨ 9
§ K 8 7 5 3 |
ª J 5
© K Q 4 2
¨ A Q 3
§ Q 6 4 2 |
|
ª K Q 7 6 4
© 10 9 6 3
¨ K 6
§ A 10 |
|
ª 10 8
© 7 5
¨ J 10 8 7 5 4 2
§ J 9 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
1ª |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
5© |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Jana Jankova, Czech Republic |
The Austrian lead did not survive a single board as Matthaus Suda/Paul
Kautny got up to the five level under their own steam here, while
Jana Jankova/Milan Macura stopped at the four level.
In 4©, Macura won the diamond lead in hand and led a heart to the
king and ace. Haidinger switched to ace and another spade and, with
declarer's club loser going on the third diamond, there was just
the ©J to be lost; +420.
Five Hearts was a hopeless contract, of course. According to the
hand record, Kopecky led the ace of spades then switched to a low
club and declarer rose with the ace and played a heart up without
taking the club discard. Kopecky won the ©A and played king and
another club and South was allowed to ruff with the ©7. That meant
the contract was down three for 150 and 11 IMPs to Czech Republic.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 9 8 7 5
© A K J 8 7 6
¨ A 5 4
§ - |
ª A K 10 4
© 10
¨ K J 3
§ K J 5 3 2 |
|
ª 3 2
© 5 4
¨ 10 9 7 6 2
§ A Q 8 6 |
|
ª Q J 6
© Q 9 3 2
¨ Q 8
§ 10 9 7 4 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
2§ |
2© |
3§ |
4© |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
Pass |
3§ |
Dble |
3© |
Dble |
Pass |
4§ |
4© |
5§ |
All Pass |
The Czechs consolidated their lead when they declared game in both
rooms on Board 3. Though it was the Austrian East/West pair who
found the club fit immediately, while the Czechs did not find it
until later in the auction, it was the Austrians who were prepared
to defend against 4©, whereas the Czechs bid on to 5§ over that
contract.
The lead against 4© was the ace of clubs, ruffed by declarer, who
proceeded to lead a diamond to the queen without touching the trump
suit. Suda won the ¨K and cashed the two top spades but, not liking
what he saw, now switched to diamonds, after which Kopecky had no
further problems; +420.
Two top hearts were led against 5§, Jankove ruffing the second.
She played §K and a second club to the ace then the ¨10, covered
by queen, king and ace. Had Haidinger ducked the first diamond,
the contract would have had to go down, as declarer cannot draw
all the trumps before playing a second diamond, and now South can
get a ruff. However, after the first diamond was won, the defence
was powerless. Declarer won the diamond return, drew trumps and
claimed eleven tricks; +600 and 14 IMPs to Czech Republic.
Board 5. N/S Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª Q 4 2
© 10 7 3
¨ A K Q 10 2
§ Q 4 |
ª K 10 8 3
© K 9 5
¨ 5 4
§ 10 9 8 6 |
|
ª A 9 6
© Q 6 4
¨ J 7 6 3
§ A J 5 |
|
ª J 7 5
© A J 8 2
¨ 9 8
§ K 7 3 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
1NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
I am looking for a polite term to describe the respective Wests'
doubles on this deal. The best I have managed to come up with so
far is over-aggressive. Perhaps the Austrians play double as some
kind of take-out, but it still seems way too aggressive, and quite
normal for East to pass with 12 HCP sitting over the opener. As
for Jankova's double, she will no doubt say that it was merely balancing,
but I think it should still be stronger than this hand or else partner
can never afford to pass it out. Again, for me it was normal for
Macura to defend 1NT doubled.
Macura led a low spade to the ten and queen and Haidinger cashed
the three top diamonds, only to be diasppointed when the jack did
not appear. He conceded the fourth diamond and now Macura could
not read the spade situation so switched to the ©Q. Haidinger could
win and play a second heart to the king. When Jankova played ªK
now, she restricted the defence to only two spade tricks and that
cost an overtrick; +380.
At the other table, Kautny did well not to lead a diamond at trick
one. However, the actual low heart proved to be no more successful.
It ran to Suda's king and back came a diamond – a little naive
of Suda, I would think, as partner's failure to lead the suit surely
marks declarer with long diamonds. Kopecky ran the diamond to Kautny's
jack and back came a heart, which he ran to his ten. Kopecky cashed
the ©A then the diamonds and came to two black tricks in the ending
when the defence got into a tangle. that was nine tricks for +580
and 5 IMPs to Czech Republic. Macura/Haidinger would have been pleased
to gain on the board, I think.
Board 10. All Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª Q 4 3
© A 7
¨ 8 5
§ K Q 9 8 7 5 |
ª J 9 5
© K J 8 5 3
¨ A J 7
§ J 10 |
|
ª A 10 7 2
© 10 6 4 2
¨ 9 4 2
§ 4 2 |
|
ª K 8 6
© Q 9
¨ K Q 10 6 3
§ A 6 3 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
Pass |
1¨ |
1© |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
The same contract was reached but from different sides of the table
and with jankove having directed the opening lead. While Haidinger's
jump to 2NT over the opposing overcall may have approximately described
his range and heart stopper, it got the hand played the wrong way
up, as perhaps it deserved to do when a simple 2§ bid was available.
Macura's heart lead duly assured the defence of six winners; –200.
Hoderova's 1NT opening was raised dircetly to game and, fortuitously,
got the contract played the right way up. Suda led a low spade rather
than the obvious heart, but that did declarer no harm at all as
the king beat East's ten. Hoderova played a club to the king then
a diamond to queen and ace. The rather obscure choice of returning
the ¨J now did not exactly paralyse declarer, who had the remainder;
twelve tricks for +690 and 13 IMPs to Czech Republic.
Board 15. N/S Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 7
© K Q 8 7
¨ 10 9 6 4 3
§ A 9 7 |
ª A J 8 6
© A 5 4
¨ K 7 5
§ 8 6 3 |
|
ª 10 5 4 3
© J 10 9 3
¨ A 2
§ K 5 2 |
|
ª K Q 9 2
© 6 2
¨ Q J 8
§ Q J 10 4 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
1¨ |
Dble |
2¨ |
2ª |
3¨ |
3ª |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
1¨ |
Dble |
1NT |
2ª |
All Pass |
|
|
I must say that I prefer Hopfler's 1NT to the 'nothing-bid' of
2¨ chosen by Hoderova at the other table, but it was the latter
call which proved to be more successful as it paved the way for
Kopecky to push the opposition up a level.
Haidinger led the ©K against Jankova's 2ª. She won the ace and
played a diamond to the ace then led the ª10, running it when it
was not covered. That was a very good start for declarer, who lost
only one trick in each of spades, hearts and clubs when the defenders
failed to take their heart ruff; ten tricks for +170.
Hoderova's diamond raise not only helped to push her opponents
to the three level, it also got Haidinger off to a safe diamond
lead. Suda won the king and played a club to the king then the ª10
to king and ace. From here he had lost control of the hand and had
two losers in both hearts and clubs, as well as the trump suit to
sort out. Seven tricks proved to be all that could be managed; down
two for –200 and a further 9 IMPs to Czech Republic.
Board 16. E/W Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª A 3 2
© 9
¨ K Q 8 6 3
§ A 8 5 3 |
ª J 8 7 5
© A Q 8 6
¨ A J 10
§ Q 2 |
|
ª 9 6 4
© K J 10 7 5 4
¨ 2
§ J 9 7 |
|
ª K Q 10
© 3 2
¨ 9 7 5 4
§ K 10 6 4 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
1§ |
1¨ |
2© |
3¨ |
3© |
4¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
4© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
1§ |
1¨ |
1© |
2¨ |
2© |
3¨ |
3© |
All Pass |
Kautny's weak jump shift of 2© put some momentum into the auction
and Suda competed twice in hearts, finally being doubled when he
bid game. Hoderova led a diamond but it really didn't matter very
much. There were five top losers and none of them were going anywhere;
down two for –500.
Macura's simple 1© bid resulted in a quiet auction where everyone
had done their bidding by the time the three level was reached.
Of course, there was no double here, and when Macura lost the obvious
five tricks he was just one down for 100 but 9 IMPs to Czech Republic.
Board 18. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª K J 10 8 6 4
© Q 9
¨ 9 6
§ J 7 5 |
ª 3
© A 8 6 5 3 2
¨ K Q 2
§ Q 10 9 |
|
ª A Q 7 2
© K 7
¨ 10 7 5
§ A 8 6 4 |
|
ª 9 5
© J 10 4
¨ A J 8 4 3
§ K 3 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
1§ |
Pass |
1© |
1ª |
1NT |
2¨ |
2© |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
1§ |
1¨ |
1© |
1ª |
1NT |
Pass |
2© |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Both Wests took very conservative positions here when they settled
for a non-forcing 2© at their second turn – quite out of charachter
with most of what we had seen in the match to date. Certainly, I
would be more inclined to bid game if partner had shown a weak no
trump type – particularly at the table where right-hand-opponent
had bid diamonds, thereby guaranteeing that the ace would be well-placed.
Anyway, Suda was left to play in 2© and made ten tricks after a
diamond lead to the ace and a diamond back; +170.
Jankove was given the opportunity to show her hidden values when
Haidinger competed with 2ª. Of course, he did not have any extra
values to justify this, but it was not unreasonable on this auction
to expect partner to be a little stronger. Macura was delighted
to pass his partner's double. He led king and a nother heart and
Jankova won and played a third round. Macura ruffed this as Haidinger
pitched his losing diamond. There were still two spades and two
clubs to be lost, so that was down two for –500 and 8 IMPs
to Czech Republic.
Board 19. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª A 6 4
© A 9 7 2
¨ A 10 9
§ J 6 3 |
ª K 8 5 3
© K J 4 3
¨ K Q 5
§ 9 4 |
|
ª Q 9 7
© 8 6 5
¨ J 8 4 2
§ A K 2 |
|
ª J 10 2
© Q 10
¨ 7 6 3
§ Q 10 8 7 5 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Rdbl |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
The first round of the two auctions was identical. Then, Haidinger,
perhaps chastened by his experience on the previous deal, went quietly
as North and defnded 1NT. At the other table, Kopecky doubled and,
when Kautny could show his maximum with a redouble, the Czechs were
in big trouble. Kopecky misunderstood his partner's run out to 2§,
which should be natural until proven otherwise, and now there was
no seven-card fit to be had without going back to clubs a level
higher, which neither player was willing to do. Playing a three-three
fit with two balanced hands and the minority of the high cards is
rarely a smart idea, and this deal was no exception to the general
rule.
Macura made 1NT excatly after a club lead. He ducked but won the
second club to play on diamonds. The clubs were cleared but South
could be kept off play until seven tricks had been established;
+90.
Hoderova faced a rather more demanding task. The lead was the ¨K
to dummy's ace. Hoderova tried a heart to the ten, losing to the
jack, and the defence cashed two diamonds then switched to three
rounds of clubs for a ruff. Hoderova won the heart switch now with
the ace and ruffed a heart then played a winning club. She came
to another heart ruff plus the ace of trumps for down three; –500
and 9 IMPs to Austria, for whom this swing was too little too late.
Board 20. All Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª 6 5 3
© A 5 4
¨ Q 8
§ 8 7 6 4 3 |
ª A K Q 9 7
© 10
¨ A K 9 5 2
§ J 5 |
|
ª 10
© J 8 7 3 2
¨ J 10 7 6 4
§ Q 9 |
|
ª J 8 4 2
© K Q 9 6
¨ 3
§ A K 10 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Suda |
Kopecky |
Kautny |
Hoderova |
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jankova |
Haidinger |
Macura |
Hopfler |
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
3¨ |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
Would you rebid 2¨, as did Suda, or 3¨ as preferred by Jankova?
The 2¨ bid caught a simple raise from partner and this was not sufficient
to convince suda to go on facing a passed partner. That was right
in theory, of course, as there are three top losers in 5¨. And on
aclub lead Kopecky/Hoderova duly took their three winners; +130.
Macura jumped to game facing the 3¨ rebid. The record states that
Haidinger cashed the ace of hearts then switched to a spade. This
is a very strange thing to do. Also strange is the fact that declarer
is only credited with eleven tricks after this defence, when both
declarer's club losers can be ruffed in dummy easily enough. Ah
well, +600 was worth 10 IMPs to Czech Republic, completing an emphatic
86-22 IMP, 25-3 VP win.
The Czechs became the first leaders in the event (unless you count
England, of course, who led for the first few boards in the morning
because of their bye, giving them 18 VPs while all the teams who
were actually playing in Round 1 started off level at 15-15 VPs.)
|