Afternoon Impressions
At the start of Wednesday's afternoon session, our reporting team
went back to table 1, hoping to see a good match between the leaders
at the time, GRENTHE from France, and Italy's FORNACIARI, a six-player
squad that did not play their captain in this match.
Those who would expect good bridge at this table 1 match may consider
thinking twice now before reading on, but a good match it certainly
was. Below, we compiled most of the highlights - in every respect,
that is to say.
After an easy slam bid at both tables this was board 2:
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 9 7 2
© K 8
¨ 10
§ A 9 8 3 2 |
ª Q
© Q 7 6 5 4
¨ 3 2
§ Q J 10 7 4 |
|
ª 6 5 4
© A 10 9 2
¨ A K J 8 5
§ 6 |
|
ª K J 8 3
© J 3
¨ Q 9 7 6 4
§ K 5 |
At both tables, 4ª was the final contract. As we can see from the
diagram, there is no real way to land ten tricks, but with a little
help from our friends
Say East leads a top diamond and switches
to her singleton club, one of the suits bid by her partner. Declarer
wins the king in dummy, plays a trump to his ace (felling the queen)
and leads a cunning §9 from hand. If you ruff and next cash the
©A the contract will be made, so you better discard
Anyway, a substantial swing to FORNACIARI, as the proper defence
was found only once.
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª Q J 10 5 4
© Q 10 6
¨ 9 8
§ 9 3 2 |
ª K 3 2
© J 8 7
¨ K 3
§ K Q 6 5 4 |
|
ª A 8 7
© K 5 2
¨ Q J 7 6 5 2
§ A |
|
ª 9 6
© A 9 4 3
¨ A 10 4
§ J 10 8 7 |
In the table 1 match, 3NT was made at both tables when the best
defence was missed. North leads the ªQ, West wins, unblocks the
§A and leads a diamond off dummy. South should hop up with her ace
now and continue spades. If she does not, declarer wins his ¨K,
cashes just one more top club and establishes his diamonds.
If South grabs her ¨A, declarer unblocks the king and now has to
read the position well to succeed. He should win the next spade
and cash the diamonds, throwing a spade, a heart and two clubs.
He then exits with a losing spade to North, throwing another club.
What can North do? On the last diamond he has a choice of evils.
He can either keep two spades and ©Q10, thus parting with his last
club and allowing himself to be thrown in with a spade, or he can
blank his ©Q in which case declarer can win by laying down the ©K
from dummy. Several declarers found either winning play against
this optimum defence.
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª J 9 8 4
© 10 9 6
¨ A 10 6 5
§ A 5 |
ª A Q
© A Q 8 7 4
¨ Q 8 7 3 2
§ 4 |
|
ª 5 2
© K J 2
¨ -
§ K Q 10 8 7 6 3 2 |
|
ª K 10 7 6 3
© 5 3
¨ K J 9 4
§ J 9 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vivaldi |
Vanhoutte |
Rossano |
Vanhoutte |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
1ª |
2§ |
4ª |
5¨ |
Dble |
5© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
When East did not judge her hand worth a vulnerable opening pre-empt,
EW had given themselves a free run to what might be the wrong contract.
After a spade lead into the tenace, North grabbed his §A at trick
two and continued the ¨A! Dummy was an entry short now, so when
South ruffed the third club from her doubleton, there was no way
to make the contract. Down two, GRENTHE +500.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Grenthe |
Caiti |
Grenthe |
Peirce |
|
|
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
The club suit may well be too good for a three-level pre-empt and
3NT might make when partner has some support in diamonds. When North
led a low diamond, the contract was doomed with four diamond tricks
and the §A. Still 9 imps for GRENTHE, but it might have been a 15-imp
swing had they bid and made 5§.
On the next board, we again saw the squeeze mechanism in operation.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª Q 3
© 9 8 4
¨ Q J 3
§ Q 10 6 5 4 |
ª 10 8 7 5
© A K 10 7 6 2
¨ 10 8
§ 3 |
|
ª J 6
© Q J
¨ A 7 6 5 2
§ A J 9 8 |
|
ª A K 9 4 2
© 5 3
¨ K 9 4
§ K 7 2 |
After a 1ª-opening by South, both Wests reached 4© and both Norths
led the ªQ and switched to a trump. Both declarers next led a low
diamond from dummy. In the Closed Room, Peirce grabbed the ¨K, cashed
the ªA and returned a trump. Now declarer had time to ruff out the
diamonds (the suit breaking a lucky 3-3) with the §A still there
as an entry to dummy. Ten tricks.
In the Open Room, South ducked the low diamond and North won the
jack. He returned a club to remove the entry, an essential play.
Vivaldi won the ace and led the ªJ from dummy. South won this and
now tried to cash the §K first instead of simply playing a second
trump. Dummy was dead already, so a possible club winner cannot
run away. Vivaldi was quick to seize his chance: he ruffed, ruffed
a spade and played off all the trumps, squeezing North in diamonds
and clubs and South in diamonds and spades. Well done for a flat
board.
The next board is included as a warning to all of us.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 5 3 2
© 9 4 2
¨ A 7 3
§ A Q |
ª Q 9
© A K J 6
¨ K Q J 2
§ K 7 4 |
|
ª J 6 4
© Q 10 7
¨ 9 8 4
§ J 9 3 2 |
|
ª K 8 7
© 8 5 3
¨ 10 6 5
§ 10 8 6 5 |
Levy Anne, France
|
|
On this one, West, playing at notrumps, managed to make two spade
tricks when North led a spade at trick one. We cannot tell you more
The final score was 19-17 to FORNACIARI, a 16-14 win in V.P.
In the second match of the afternoon, once again the table 4 match
is focused. It would be WILLARD from France v. MALI, a Polish combination
with some Norwegian flavour in it.
On board 1, which in the Closed Room actually was the 6th board
to be played, Hervé Mouïel was not happy.
Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª K Q J 9 6
© 9 5 3 2
¨ 8 7 4
§ 5 |
ª 7 4 3 2
© K 7 6
¨ A Q J
§ 9 3 2 |
|
ª 5
© J 8
¨ K 10 6 5 3 2
§ A J 7 4 |
|
ª A 10 8
© A Q 10 4
¨ 9
§ K Q 10 8 6 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Winciorek |
Mouïel |
Sarniak |
Willard |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
2¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Mouïel felt that his partner might have bid 4© immediately
over 2©. In a sense, he was right as he emerged with ten tricks
on a diamond lead and continuation, but
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levy |
Malinovski |
Levy |
Thoresen |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
When Alain Levy found the spade lead from the West seat, he had
secured the spade ruff for his partner. Well done for another +50
or 6 imps to the French.
On the following board, the Polish equalised:
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 10 8 6 5 3
© K 9 5 2
¨ -
§ K 10 5 2 |
ª K Q J 9
© Q J 10 7 3
¨ J 7 5
§ 9 |
|
ª A 7 4
© 8 4
¨ K 9 8
§ A Q J 7 6 |
|
ª 2
© A 6
¨ A Q 10 6 4 3 2
§ 8 4 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levy |
Malinovski |
Levy |
Thoresen |
|
|
1§ |
1¨ |
1© |
1ª |
2§ |
2¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
The French sold out rather cheaply here, each of them holding something
in reserve. The contract duly went one down, but
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Winciorek |
Mouïel |
Sarniak |
Willard |
|
|
1NT |
3¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Here, EW made it easy going for themselves by starting off with
a strong notrump. On the lead of the ¨A nine tricks were quickly
made. MALI +400 and 7 imps back.
Then, a slam decision:
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª 7 4
© K Q 5 2
¨ A Q 6 3
§ 10 3 2 |
ª 10
© A 7 6
¨ K 10 9 5 2
§ J 9 6 5 |
|
ª A 3
© J 10 9 8 4 3
¨ 8 4
§ 8 7 4 |
|
ª K Q J 9 8 6 5 2
© -
¨ J 7
§ A K Q |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levy |
Malinovski |
Levy |
Thoresen |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
Holding quite a lot of useful values in reserve, Malinovski had
an automatic raise over 4ª. When West did not lead his ©A but a
spade instead, declarer had to perform a standard show-up squeeze
on him to make sure of his contract. MALI +1430.
In the other room, East made some noise:
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Winciorek |
Mouïel |
Sarniak |
Willard |
Pass |
Pass |
2¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Maybe South should have taken stronger action. Maybe, North should
have taken stronger action. When West led the ©A, declarer could
quickly claim 12 tricks for a loss of 13 imps.
Once again, the equaliser came on the next board.
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª A Q 10 9
© Q 7 4
¨ A 7 6 3
§ 9 6 |
ª 5
© 10 9 8 6 3
¨ K Q 4 2
§ 10 7 5 |
|
ª 8
© A
¨ J 10 9 8 5
§ A K 8 4 3 2 |
|
ª K J 7 6 4 3 2
© K J 5 2
¨ -
§ Q J |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Winciorek |
Mouïel |
Sarniak |
Willard |
|
1¨ |
2§ |
2ª |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
When East did not compete any further at her second opportunity,
NS had a free run to 620.
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levy |
Malinovski |
Levy |
Thoresen |
|
1¨ |
2§ |
2ª |
3§ |
4ª |
5§ |
5ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
Hervé Mouiel, France
|
Please note that 5§
will be beaten only on a spade lead and diamond continuation. East
does not hold the §9
and thus will pick up the trumps for no loser. This would have been
a great save, but beating 5ª
turned an 11-imp swing into a 12-imp one.
The score stood at 20-18 to the Polish (Norwegian) and remained
unchanged for four rather dull boards. On the last board, we once
again saw far too little action at either table, this time resulting
in a partscore swing to the French:
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª A Q 9 8
© K 9 7 6 4
¨ K Q 5
§ 10 |
ª K 6 5 4
© A Q 8 5 3
¨ A J
§ K 5 |
|
ª 3 2
© J 10
¨ 7 4 3 2
§ Q J 9 7 2 |
|
ª J 10 7
© 2
¨ 10 9 8 6
§ A 8 6 4 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levy |
Malinovski |
Levy |
Thoresen |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
??? |
|
|
What would you bid with the North hand? Malinovski did not know
the reply and passed. So did everybody else. The contract was made
on the lead of the §10. WILLARD +80.
At the other table, Mouïel was faced with the same problem.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Winciorek |
Mouïel |
Sarniak |
Willard |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
??? |
|
|
He improvised with 1ª
and there it rested. With his usual careful play, he managed no
less than ten tricks and thought he had missed a game and lost the
board. Not quite. WILLARD scored an unexpected 6 imps on this one
to win 24-20 or 16-14 V.P.
|