There was an explosive start to the Final between the holders from
France and the winners of the Dutch Mixed Teams
Championship who, as their prize, became the official Dutch
team in Aachen.
Board 1. Dealer North. Love
All |
|
 |
A Q |
|
 |
A K J 8 7 |
 |
J |
 |
10 8 7 6 5 |
 |
9 6 3 |
 |
 |
K 10 8 7 5 4 2 |
 |
|
 |
Q 5 3 |
 |
A 10 8 7 5 2 |
 |
3 |
 |
K J 4 2 |
 |
Q 9 |
|
 |
J |
|
 |
10 9 6 4 2 |
 |
K Q 9 6 4 |
 |
A 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
4 |
|
5 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
4NT |
5 |
|
Dble |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
5 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Vugraph East overcalled only Two Spades and the French
were allowed to play in Five Hearts. This is defeated by a minor suit
lead, but West had not suggested an alternative and East led a fatal
spade. Chemla was able to discard his losing club, and gave up
only a trump and A for 450 to France.
At the other table Veronique Bessis overcalled Three Spades
on the East cards, and that encouraged Michel to go on to the
Five level and he took the chance to indicate a lead other than a
spade.
"The five level belongs to the opponents" is good advice,
but only if you find the right lead! Various leads beat Five Spades
doubled but not ace and another club. Declarer won, ruffed a heart and
led a trump. So Five Spades doubled made for another 650 to France.
A swing of 15 IMPs on the first board.
The next board was also a thriller, though it produced no swing:
Board 2. Dealer East. NS
Game |
|
 |
K 8 7 6 4 3 |
|
 |
J 6 2 |
 |
6 3 2 |
 |
Q |
 |
Q |
 |
 |
A 5 2 |
 |
K Q |
 |
A 10 8 7 4 |
 |
K Q 10 4 |
 |
A 9 8 7 |
 |
A 9 8 6 4 2 |
 |
K |
|
 |
J 10 9 |
|
 |
9 5 3 |
 |
J 5 |
 |
J 10 7 5 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
4 |
|
Pass |
|
4 |
|
Pass |
4NT |
|
Pass |
|
5 |
|
Pass |
5NT |
|
Pass |
|
6 |
|
Pass |
7 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
3 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
4 |
|
Pass |
|
4 |
|
Pass |
4NT |
|
Pass |
|
5 |
|
Pass |
5NT |
|
Pass |
|
7 |
|
All Pass |
|
Take the Dutch auction first. After the fourth suit 2
East's raise implied the singleton club. 4 was a cuebid, 4NT Roman
Keycard Blackwood, a response showing three keys, an enquiry about
kings and East showed one outside trumps. West now knew that either
East held AKx or K, making the grand a good proposition.
South led J. Bakker won, led a trump to dummy, returned
with a club, ruffed a spade, unblocked the hearts, cashed another top
trump and led A. North ruffed, and was over-ruffed. A spade ruff was
followed by a club ruff and then A felled the suit. Whew!
At the other table after the same first three bids, West was able to
make a forcing raise to 3 . The lead was the same, but we have no
details of the play except that the slam was made for a flat board.
Board 3. Dealer South. EW
Game |
|
 |
J 8 6 4 |
|
 |
K 7 5 4 |
 |
K Q J 3 |
 |
8 |
 |
2 |
 |
 |
Q 10 9 5 |
 |
Q J 8 3 2 |
 |
10 6 |
 |
8 7 |
 |
10 6 5 2 |
 |
K Q 7 6 5 |
 |
A J 4 |
|
 |
A K 7 3 |
|
 |
A 9 |
 |
A 9 4 |
 |
10 9 3 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
Pass |
|
4 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1NT |
Dble |
|
Rdble |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Clubs doubled did not prove very profitable for the Dutch
North-South pair who collected only 200. This was poor exchange for
the easy game made at the other table despite the 4-1 trump break.
Saul lost only one club and two trumps. A further 6 IMPs to France.
Board 4 was a normal game which failed at both tables when the
trumps were 5-0. Board 5 saw France gain an overtrick IMP and
two more came on the next deal:
Board 6. Dealer East. EW
Game |
|
 |
A |
|
 |
8 7 |
 |
10 8 5 2 |
 |
A J 9 8 7 2 |
 |
K J 10 9 8 7 |
 |
 |
3 |
 |
Q 6 3 |
 |
K J 10 9 5 4 2 |
 |
A Q |
 |
J 7 4 3 |
 |
10 6 |
 |
K |
|
 |
Q 6 5 4 2 |
|
 |
A |
 |
K 9 6 |
 |
Q 5 4 3 |
|
Both Easts opened 3 and were raised to game. Chemla and
Wanner both found a brave 5 bid with the North cards and
played there, the only difference being that Michel doubled
while Begas did not. Both Norths must have been quite
impressed with the dummy, I think. They took the normal line in trumps
by starting with the queen in case of a 3-0 break onside. Both went
one down now, losing a club and two diamonds; -50 for Chemla
and -100 for Wanner - 2 IMPs to Bessis.
Board 7. Dealer South. Game
All |
|
 |
5 3 |
|
 |
6 4 |
 |
K 10 5 4 2 |
 |
A 9 8 5 |
 |
A J 10 7 6 |
 |
 |
Q |
 |
A Q 7 5 2 |
 |
K J 10 |
 |
Q 3 |
 |
J 7 6 |
 |
3 |
 |
K Q 7 6 4 2 |
|
 |
K 9 8 4 2 |
|
 |
9 8 3 |
 |
A 9 8 |
 |
J 10 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
All Pass |
|
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
3 |
|
Pass |
|
4 |
|
All Pass |
|
The key decision fell to the respective East players over their
partners' 2 rebid. The hand is slightly short of the values to force
to game if you play an aggressive opening style but most of us would
shrug our shoulders and bid 3 anyway, as did Veronique, who
soon became dummy in 4 . Ellen Bakker preferred to repeat her
clubs and 3 ended the auction.
In 3 the lead was a heart. Bakker won and played her spade
to the ace then passed the jack of spades, pitching a diamond. Saul
promptly switched to ace and another diamond and there were three
trump losers to come for two down; -200.
Trump leads might have put 4 under some pressure in the other room
but the actual defence was to lead diamonds and declarer could lead
towards the clubs and soon had ten tricks; +620 and 13 IMPs to Bessis,
ahead by 37.
Board 8. Dealer West. Love
All |
|
 |
Q 10 7 |
|
 |
6 2 |
 |
A K Q 6 5 4 |
 |
Q 6 |
 |
6 4 |
 |
 |
A 8 5 3 |
 |
A Q 10 9 3 |
 |
|
 |
J 9 7 |
 |
8 3 2 |
 |
J 10 7 |
 |
A K 8 5 4 3 |
|
 |
K J 9 2 |
|
 |
K J 8 7 5 4 |
 |
10 |
 |
9 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
4 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
Dble |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
In the Closed Room, Wanner passed the North hand on the
second round and Gielkens balanced with 3 . Perhaps a double
would have been better but 3 was not a horrible call, it just
suffered a horrible fate - doubled for three down and -500.
In the Open Room, Chemla rebid 3 and that would have kept
Saul quiet even had Bakker not competed further with
3 . Begas converted that to 4 , ending the auction. The
defence took three diamonds and soon had a spade also for one down;
-50 and 11 IMPs to Bessis. The lead was up to 48.
Board 9. Dealer North. EW
Game |
|
 |
7 |
|
 |
A Q 10 9 |
 |
8 7 6 5 |
 |
J 10 5 3 |
 |
10 9 4 |
 |
 |
A J 6 3 |
 |
J 2 |
 |
K 7 6 5 |
 |
Q J 9 4 |
 |
A |
 |
Q 7 4 2 |
 |
A 9 8 6 |
|
 |
K Q 8 5 2 |
|
 |
8 4 3 |
 |
K 10 3 2 |
 |
K |
|
The two auctions were identical - East opened 1 , South overcalled
1 and everybody passed. The contract was two down for -100 in the
Closed Room but Catherine Saul did rather better on vugraph.
The lead was the Q to East's bare ace. Bakker switched to ace
and another club and Saul discarded a heart while Begas
won the queen. He switched to the 2 and Saul won the ace and
cashed the two club winners, throwing her remaining heart then a
diamond. Now she played a spade to her queen followed by a low spade.
Begas won the 9 and gave his partner a diamond ruff. Saul
ruffed the heart return and played another spade and had the rest; +80
and 5 IMPs to Bessis.
The loser on loser play on the club at trick three was good play but
perhaps if West had ducked this, holding declarer to one club winner,
that would have been a nice counter and would have led to one down.
Board 10. Dealer East. Game
All |
|
 |
10 5 3 |
|
 |
K J 9 3 |
 |
K 9 |
 |
J 9 7 3 |
 |
K 9 7 4 2 |
 |
 |
A |
 |
8 7 4 |
 |
A 10 |
 |
8 6 3 |
 |
A Q J 10 7 4 2 |
 |
Q 8 |
 |
K 10 2 |
|
 |
Q J 8 6 |
|
 |
Q 6 5 2 |
 |
5 |
 |
A 6 5 4 |
|
Both Easts played in 3NT. In one room the lead was the Q , in the
other the 2 to North's king. How should you play? It looks to us as
though on the spade lead a club to the queen gives an extra chance. If
the club is onside you get to take the diamond finesse, while if it is
not you can fall back on trying to drop the K. On a heart lead you
need to judge whether hearts will be 4-4, when the same logic applies,
or 5-3, when the only hope is to play to drop the diamond. Both our
declarers cashed the ace of diamonds at trick two and had five losers;
one down for a push.
There was a decent slam for East/West on the next board, missed at
both tables, though it was reached by Croatia in the third
place match. Then Bessis went even further ahead with a quick
one-two on the next two deals.
Board 12. Dealer West. NS
Game |
|
 |
J 6 |
|
 |
9 7 |
 |
4 2 |
 |
K Q 10 9 8 7 2 |
 |
K 10 8 2 |
 |
 |
5 4 |
 |
K J 5 |
 |
A Q 10 6 3 |
 |
A K Q 8 7 6 |
 |
J 9 3 |
 |
|
 |
A 4 3 |
|
 |
A Q 9 7 3 |
|
 |
8 4 2 |
 |
10 5 |
 |
J 6 5 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
2 |
|
Dble |
|
All Pass |
|
Disaster for the Dutch. Whatever the double should have
meant, they were clearly not reading from the same page of the system
file. Even if double is penalty, it is questionable whether West
should pass it. There was no problem in defeating 2 doubled, but one
down for +100 was hardly adequate compensation for the cold slam. The
French sailed into slam at the other table:
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Michel
Bessis |
|
Wanner |
|
Veronique
Bessis |
|
Gielkens |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Dble |
|
Pass |
|
4 |
|
Pass |
6 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
The double of 1 was a support double, showing three-card heart
support. When Veronique jumped to game, Michel had no
trouble in bidding six; +980 and 13 IMPs to Bessis.
Board 13. Dealer North. Game
All |
|
 |
A 9 8 2 |
|
 |
J 9 7 2 |
 |
J 9 8 4 |
 |
J |
 |
3 |
 |
 |
J 6 5 4 |
 |
A 4 |
 |
Q 10 6 |
 |
A Q 10 7 5 3 2 |
 |
6 |
 |
A K 6 |
 |
Q 9 8 7 5 |
|
 |
K Q 10 7 |
|
 |
K 8 5 3 |
 |
K |
 |
10 4 3 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Begas |
|
Chemla |
|
Bakker |
|
Saul |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
4 |
|
Dble |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
When Wanner led the nine of hearts and Michel put in
dummy's ten, he had no heart loser. There were just two diamonds and a
spade to lose; +710.
In the other room Saul opened 1 rather than 1 and Begas
punted 3NT. That was not a success. The lead was a low heart to the
queen, king and ace. Begas returned a heart towards the ten
and Chemla ducked. The ten scored and Begas led
dummy's diamond. When the king appeared he won and cashed a hopeful
queen but when South showed out he had nowhere to go for tricks and
was two down; -200 and 14 more IMPs to Bessis.
There were a couple of small swings to come for Bessis and
at half-time in the final they led by an incredible 85-0! The third
place play-off saw even more swings, but at 65-64 to the French
team, it was nicely poised for a fiercely competitive second half.
|