 |
DAILY
BULLETIN
INTERNET
EDITION |
Number 6 Friday 21 March 1997 |
Editors:
Mark Horton, Brian Senior, Patrick Jourdain
Web Editor: Panos Pavlides | |
Results |
Contents |
OPEN,
Final A, Sess 1
OPEN, Final A, Sess 2
OPEN, Final B, Sess 1
OPEN, Final B, Sess 2
OPEN, Consolation, Sess 1
OPEN, Consolation, Sess 2
SENIORS, Final, Sess 2
SENIORS, Consolation, Sess 2 |
Thanks from the President
OPEN PAIRS, 1st Final session
OPEN PAIRS, 2nd Final session
Bid & Breakfast
|
High Pressure on
the Barometer |
An exciting finish, heightened by the players' knowledge of the current
scores, is in prospect in the Open Pairs Championship. These are the leading
scores:
1 |
Fredin |
Lindkvist |
Sweden |
56.48% |
2 |
Gotard |
Holowski |
Germany |
56.36% |
3 |
Babsch |
Umshaus |
Austria |
55.82% |
Deutsch Players on the
Mark |
The prospects of a gold medal for Germany increased when a strong finish to
the second session enabled the overnight leaders to strengthen their position.
The top of the table looks like this:
1 |
Humburg |
Mattsson |
Germany |
58.75% |
2 |
Hall |
Lind |
Sweden |
56.75% |
3 |
Riise |
Salterod |
Norway |
55.91% |
Congratulations to the winners of the Consolation, Poland's Czech &
Macior, and the Seniors Consolation, Germany's Alvensleben &
Höger. For them the hard work is over and they can relax until the
prize-giving ceremony.
A
Big 'Thank you' from the President
The Prize-Giving Ceremony this afternoon will be for you - the players. It
will be a time for all of you to celebrate the victorious (perhaps yourself) and
commiserate with the also-rans. A time to collect your prizes and say your
good-byes.
But over breakfast with your Daily Bulletin, please spare a couple of
minutes to appreciate what effort has gone in to make the 9th European Open
Pairs and 4th Seniors Pairs Championship such a success.
On behalf of the European Bridge League - on your behalf - I would
like to make four big "Thank Yous"!
First a thank you to all the staff, including the Tournament Directors under
Claude Dadoun and Max Bavin; The Bulletin Staff under Mark
Horton; The Press Room staff of Elly Ducheyne and Jan Swaan;
the Appeals Committee chaired by Jens Auken and Steen Møller;
the Scoring Team of Marc van Bejsterveld, Eric van Dijk, Pascale
van Dujse and Andre Heys; our long-suffering secretary Anna
Gudge and last, but by no means least, Ton Kooijman the Tournament
Manager.
Second I must express my appreciation for all the help given to the
Championship by the Nederlandse Bridge Bond. I can say with complete
certainty that without the support of the Dutch Bridge Federation the
organization of the Championship would have been impossible. So thank you Folkert
Schukken and Marijke Blanken and all your colleagues on the
Organization Committee. I know that Laurens Hoedemaker, its President will
convey our warmest thanks to the Dutch Bridge Federation.
Third we must thank the sponsors of the Championship who gave so generously
in cash and kind. Including: the Dutch Government, the Municipality
of The Hague, Netherlands Congress Centre, Cannon, Melchemie
and Stichting Promotie Den Haag. And a special mention to the team who
provided the biggest, the best and the most networked set of computers ever seen
at an International Bridge Championship - Noble Van Dijk & Partners,
Compaq Computers and Microsoft.
And fourth and last a thank you to all of you - the competitors. Thank you
for coming to The Hague, for participating with sporting endeavour and for being
gracious in victory and stoic in defeat. Bill Pencharz EBL
President |
OPEN
PAIRS |
1st Final Session |
Due to the Barometer scoring, it is no longer possible to watch the same
boards at more than one table. For session one of the final I decided to watch
six boards of the leading mixed qualifiers, Andrea Rauscheid and Nedu
Buchlev of Germany, then six boards of the leading women's pair, Marijke
van der Pas and
Bep Vriend of the Netherlands
Board 1. Love All. Dealer North. |
|
 |
A 6 2 |
|
 |
10 8 7 6 4 |
 |
10 8 5 |
 |
A 7 |
 |
7 4 3 |
 |
 |
K Q J 10 9 8 5 |
 |
J |
 |
2 |
 |
A 9 7 4 2 |
 |
K 6 |
 |
Q J 8 6 |
 |
K 5 4 |
|
 |
- |
|
 |
A K Q 9 5 3 |
 |
Q J 3 |
 |
10 9 3 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Versluis |
|
Buchlev |
|
Vis |
|
Rauscheid |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
2 |
Dble |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
5 |
|
Dble |
|
All Pass |
|
| |
A great start for the Germans. 4
can be beaten by
leading two rounds of clubs while South still has a heart entry, but as a
practical matter it will always succeed so Andrea Rauscheid did well for her
side by bidding 5
.
Not having shown any spade support yet, Versluis went on to 5
and Buchlev,
looking at two aces, doubled. He led a heart and Rauscheid switched to a club;
one down for -100 and 37 matchpoints out of 42 for Rauscheid/Buchlev.
Board 2. N/S Game. Dealer East.
|
|
 |
Q |
|
 |
A K J 3 |
 |
A 10 6 |
 |
10 9 8 6 3 |
 |
A K J 9 7 |
 |
 |
8 5 4 3 2 |
 |
2 |
 |
9 6 |
 |
8 7 4 3 |
 |
K 2 |
 |
J 4 2 |
 |
A Q 7 5 |
|
 |
10 6 |
|
 |
Q 10 8 7 5 4 |
 |
Q J 9 5 |
 |
K |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Versluis |
|
Buchlev |
|
Vis |
|
Rauscheid |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
2 |
2 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rauscheid opened a weak 2
and Versluis
dredged up a 2
overcall. Buchlev jumped to 4
but Vis had an easy
4
bid. With
most of her hand outside hearts, Rauscheid decided to double 4
but this was not a
success. Buchlev didn't look very happy about it but he eventually passed and
led a top heart. He switched to
10 but Versluis
got those right, rising with the ace to drop the bare king. He just had to lose
a diamond now; +690, leaving the Germans with just 1.1 matchpoints.
Board 3. E/W Game. Dealer South. |
|
 |
8 |
|
 |
Q J 9 8 5 |
 |
7 6 5 |
 |
K J 6 3 |
 |
A K 5 3 |
 |
 |
Q 10 6 4 |
 |
6 4 |
 |
A 10 3 |
 |
10 4 3 2 |
 |
K J |
 |
A 7 4 |
 |
Q 10 8 5 |
|
 |
J 9 7 2 |
|
 |
K 7 2 |
 |
A Q 9 8 |
 |
9 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Babsch |
|
Buchlev |
|
Umshaus |
|
Rauscheid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
1 |
|
2 |
|
2NT |
|
3 |
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
All Pass | |
1
is the
Blue Club opening on the West cards so the Austrians found their fit
immediately. Perhaps trying to disrupt a possible canapé auction, Buchlev
came in with a wafer-thin overcall and Umshaus showed a constructive
spade raise. From a passed hand, Rauscheid's 3
had to promise
heart support, and indeed Buchlev alerted it as such. But then he passed anyway,
wanting to discourage Rauscheid from competing further. Umshaus could see that
his hand wasn't getting any better and contented himself with 3
, ending the
auction.
Buchlev led a diamond to the jack and queen and Rauscheid switched to a
heart for the jack and ace. Babsch cashed ace and king of spades then played a
diamond for the king and ace. The defense played two rounds of hearts, declarer
ruffing, and he now played a low club from hand. Buchlev rose with the king but
that was the end of the defense; one down for -100. With the most popular score
being 200 to North/South, that gave the Germans 20 out of 42.
Board 4. Game All. Dealer West. |
|
 |
8 2 |
|
 |
8 5 4 |
 |
A Q 3 |
 |
J 9 7 5 2 |
 |
J 9 6 4 3 |
 |
 |
A K 5 |
 |
J 9 |
 |
K Q 10 3 |
 |
J 6 4 |
 |
10 5 2 |
 |
10 8 6 |
 |
A K 4 |
|
 |
Q 10 7 |
|
 |
A 7 6 2 |
 |
K 9 8 7 |
 |
Q 3 |
West |
|
East |
Babsch |
|
Umshaus |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1NT |
2 |
|
2 |
Pass |
|
| |
1
was
strong and 1
showed 0-6. Umshaus showed around 18-20 balanced and Babsch transferred to
spades. Rauscheid led
9 to the ace
and Buchlev switched to a low club to declarer's ace. Umshaus cashed the top
spades then played a heart to the jack and a second heart to king and ace.
Rauscheid cashed
Q to get a
signal from partner and Buchlev threw a club. It seems to me that this is a
simple situation where whichever suit partner throws you lead the other one, but
Rauscheid obviously saw things differently because she cashed
K then switched
to
Q and Umshaus
could discard both of dummy's losers on the hearts; +140, leaving only 5.3
matchpoints for the Germans.
Board 5. N/S Game. Dealer North.
|
|
 |
9 7 4 |
|
 |
Q J 6 3 2 |
 |
7 2 |
 |
K J 9 |
 |
Q J 10 5 2 |
 |
 |
A 8 3 |
 |
10 8 |
 |
A 9 |
 |
A 10 3 |
 |
Q J 6 4 |
 |
Q 8 4 |
 |
10 6 3 2 |
|
 |
K 6 |
|
 |
K 7 5 4 |
 |
K 9 8 5 |
 |
A 7 5 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
v.Luijk |
|
Buchlev |
|
Jialal |
|
Rauscheid |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1NT |
|
Dble |
Pass |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
Dble |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
Rauscheid passed over the 1
opening but then
doubled for takeout of spades on the next round. That was enough to persuade
Buchlev to compete to 3
over 2
and van Luijk
made a close matchpoint double. This was not the time for it. Jialal led a
diamond to the king and ace and back came a club. The ten forced the ace and
Buchlev played a heart to the queen and ace. Jialal played a second
club, relieving declarer's worries in that suit, and he drew the trumps and gave
up a diamond. With
A well-placed,
that was +730 and 41 matchpoints for the German pair.
Board 6. E/W Game. Dealer East. |
|
 |
10 |
|
 |
A K 2 |
 |
Q 10 8 7 6 3 |
 |
J 8 3 |
 |
A K 6 5 4 |
 |
 |
J 9 3 |
 |
Q 10 9 8 4 |
 |
J 7 3 |
 |
J 4 |
 |
K 9 2 |
 |
7 |
 |
A Q 10 2 |
|
 |
Q 8 7 2 |
|
 |
6 5 |
 |
A 5 |
 |
K 9 6 5 4 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
v.Luijk |
|
Buchlev |
|
Jialal |
|
Rauscheid |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
3 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
All Pass | |
The Dutch pair had an invitational sequence to 3
. Buchlev led a low
diamond, reducing declarer's losers in that suit to one. Rauscheid won the ace
and returned a second diamond to the king. Van Luijk led a spade to the ace then
a low spade to the jack and queen with some vague hope of keeping control.
Rauscheid returned a trump to dummy's nine and declarer had no option but to
play on hearts. He led the jack and Buchlev won and played
10. Van Luijk
ruffed and played a second heart to Buchlev's ace. He switched to a club and
declarer won the ace and played dummy's last heart but Rauscheid could ruff that
for one down; -100 but still only 13.7 matchpoints to the Germans.
The low round of spades on the second round doesn't look right as we have
seen that it doesn't succeed against the 4-1 break it was intended to guard
against. If declarer just sets about the hearts he has a better chance. Sure he
might run into a heart ruff but that is with the defensive trump trick and he
can take a trump finesse when in dummy with the
A.
On the six boards we have seen, our featured pair scored 118.1 matchpoints
against an average of 126.
Board 7. Game All. Dealer South. |
|
 |
A J 4 |
|
 |
K Q 7 3 |
 |
A 9 8 |
 |
Q 8 3 |
 |
K 9 |
 |
 |
Q 8 7 6 3 |
 |
A 10 9 4 2 |
 |
J 5 |
 |
K 4 2 |
 |
Q J 10 6 |
 |
9 7 6 |
 |
J 10 |
|
 |
10 5 2 |
|
 |
8 6 |
 |
7 5 3 |
 |
A K 5 4 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Mayer |
|
Vriend |
|
Stretz |
|
v.d.Pas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
|
1NT |
|
All Pass |
|
| |
The French pair scored surprisingly well for holding Bep Vriend to
nine tricks here, +150 giving the Dutch pair only 8 matchpoints. Stretz
led
Q and followed
up with a low one to the king. Vriend won the third round and played a club to
dummy and a heart towards hand. Jean-Paul Meyer jumped in with the
A and switched
to
K. Vriend won
and ran the clubs but there was no squeeze so Meyer got the last trick with a
heart.
1NT made ten tricks at ten tables and game was bid once.
Board 8. Love All. Dealer West. |
|
 |
- |
|
 |
Q 10 9 4 3 2 |
 |
7 6 5 3 2 |
 |
6 2 |
 |
A K J 6 5 |
 |
 |
9 4 3 |
 |
7 6 |
 |
K 5 |
 |
9 8 4 |
 |
K Q J 10 |
 |
K 9 5 |
 |
A Q J 8 |
|
 |
Q 10 8 7 2 |
|
 |
A J 8 |
 |
A |
 |
10 7 4 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Mayer |
|
Vriend |
|
Stretz |
|
v.d.Pas |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
2NT |
|
3 |
4 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
Vriend opened a multi and Stretz overcalled a natural 2NT. Van der Pas bid 3
, to compete in
partner's major, and Meyer closed proceedings with a leap to 4
. It is hard to
imagine that East/West have anywhere to run to and South's failure to double
seems a little timid.
Vriend led
10 to the king
and ace and overtook the
J return to
switch to a club. Meyer rose with the ace and played a spade to the ace, getting
the depressing news. He played a diamond to the ace and van der Pas returned a
club. Meyer won in hand and cashed two more clubs, pitching a diamond. Then he
played a diamond which van der Pas ruffed. She had to make another spade so that
was two down; -100 and 19 matchpoints to the Dutch, but a double would have
meant 31.
Board 9. E/W Game. Dealer North. |
|
 |
K 10 |
|
 |
A K 4 3 2 |
 |
K 8 6 |
 |
A 9 6 |
 |
8 6 4 3 2 |
 |
 |
A Q 9 5 |
 |
Q 10 8 |
 |
7 |
 |
Q 7 |
 |
A J 10 9 5 2 |
 |
K Q 10 |
 |
8 2 |
|
 |
J 7 |
|
 |
J 9 6 5 |
 |
4 3 |
 |
J 7 5 4 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Bitran |
|
Vriend |
|
Nahmias |
|
v.d.Pas |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
2NT |
|
Dble |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
All Pass | |
The French pair missed game when Bitran judged that too much of his
strength was in his partner's short suits to make game likely opposite a delayed
3
bid. Van der
Pas led a heart and Vriend won and cashed
A before
leading the second top heart. Nahmias was a little sloppy here, ruffing
low, and it was to cost him an overtrick. He played a club to dummy and took the
trump finesse but was left with
9 which was
bigger than anything in dummy so could not take the diamond finesse and had held
himself to ten tricks; +170 and 34.2 matchpoints for the Dutch pair.
Afterwards, Nahmias explained to me that the nine of spades is considered to
be an unlucky card in France - it certainly was on this deal!
OPEN
PAIRS |
2nd Final Session |
The leaders after the first session of the Open final were Abate and
Morelli of Italy after scoring over 62%. We will look at them shortly
but first we take a brief look at ninth placed German pair, Gotard and
Holowski.
Board 1. Love All. Dealer North. |
|
 |
A Q 10 6 |
|
 |
Q 10 9 |
 |
A 7 4 |
 |
A Q 6 |
 |
7 2 |
 |
 |
J 5 4 |
 |
8 5 |
 |
A K J 4 3 2 |
 |
10 3 2 |
 |
K Q |
 |
K 10 8 4 3 2 |
 |
J 5 |
|
 |
K 9 8 3 |
|
 |
7 6 |
 |
J 9 8 6 5 |
 |
9 7 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Panto |
|
Gotard |
|
Harris |
|
Holowski |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
Pass |
|
Dble |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The 1
opening was Polish: natural, strong and artificial or a weak no trump. 2
was described as
strong but not forcing and the double was takeout. Panto led a heart and
Harris played three rounds. As the cards lie, ruffing with the eight,
drawing trumps and playing ace and another diamond produces ten tricks, but if
the heart is over-ruffed and the club finesse loses even 2
may fail.
Holowski threw his club loser on the third heart and Harris switched to a
trump. Declarer drew three rounds and ducked a diamond. Harris won the king and
led a club and now Holowski laid down the
A and had nine
tricks; +140 and 25 matchpoints for the Germans.
Board 2. N/S Game. Dealer East.
|
|
 |
K 10 4 3 |
|
 |
10 7 6 3 |
 |
8 4 |
 |
J 9 3 |
 |
J 9 8 |
 |
 |
7 |
 |
A J 9 |
 |
K 5 4 |
 |
A J 10 |
 |
K 7 6 3 2 |
 |
A Q 8 4 |
 |
K 10 6 2 |
|
 |
A Q 6 5 2 |
|
 |
Q 8 2 |
 |
Q 9 5 |
 |
7 5 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Panto |
|
Gotard |
|
Harris |
|
Holowski |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
2NT |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
3 |
|
Pass |
|
3 |
|
Pass |
4 |
|
Pass |
|
4 |
|
Pass |
5 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
The British pair did well here. 1
and 1
were natural and
2NT showed a good 17-19. Harris showed some club support then his heart feature
and Panto realised that 3NT would be impossible as his partner had to be short
in spades. He bid 4
but then left all
the running to Harris, having already bid everything he had. Harris judged not
to bid the mediocre slam.
The lead was a heart to the queen and ace and Panto drew trumps then led a
diamond to his jack, making twelve tricks. +420 was worth 31 matchpoints for the
British pair, five East/Wests going minus and one stopping in partscore while
just two bid and made slam.
Board 3. E/W Game. Dealer South. |
|
 |
10 9 5 |
|
 |
K Q J 9 3 |
 |
K 10 |
 |
K 4 2 |
 |
Q 3 |
 |
 |
K 8 |
 |
A 7 5 4 2 |
 |
8 6 |
 |
9 8 2 |
 |
A 7 6 5 4 3 |
 |
Q 8 7 |
 |
A 9 5 |
|
 |
A J 7 6 4 2 |
|
 |
10 |
 |
Q J |
 |
J 10 6 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Bessis |
|
Gotard |
|
Rombaut |
|
Holowski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Pass |
|
2 |
|
All Pass |
|
| |
Not a very exciting board. Holowski opened a multi and passed the 2
response. Rombaut
of France led ace and another diamond and Gotard won the king and tried a low
heart to the ten. Bessis won the heart and switched to a low club and
Gotard got that right, playing small. Rombaut won the ace and played a second
club to the jack. Declarer played two rounds of spades and had the popular +140
for 22 matchpoints.
Board 4. Game All. Dealer West. |
|
 |
A 5 3 |
|
 |
K Q J 6 5 4 |
 |
Q 8 2 |
 |
8 |
 |
K 8 7 6 |
 |
 |
Q J 4 2 |
 |
9 8 |
 |
2 |
 |
J |
 |
K 9 5 4 3 |
 |
A K 10 7 4 3 |
 |
Q 5 2 |
|
 |
10 9 |
|
 |
A 10 7 3 |
 |
A 10 7 6 |
 |
J 9 6 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Bessis |
|
Gotard |
|
Rombaut |
|
Holowski |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Dble |
|
4 |
4 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
Gotard made an intermediate jump overcall and Holowski raised him to 4
. Bessis was minimum
in high cards but had nice distribution facing a probable four card spade suit
and tried his luck in 4
. Nobody saw fit to
double that and Gotard led his singleton club.
Bessis won with dummy's
Q to lead a
spade to the king and ace. Gotard led a careful
J to force
Holowski to win the trick and back came
9 for a ruff.
Gotard decided that a diamond switch might give a trick in the suit, though that
requires declarer to have a balanced hand and is really inconsistent with the
bidding and play to date. Anyway, he exited passively with a trump so the
defense had only a diamond to come; -100 and 17 matchpoints to the Germans, who
had scored 75 against 84 average on our four boards.
At another table, the bidding was identical up to the final pass. Chodorowski
of Poland doubled on the strength of his two aces. Chodorowska led her
singleton club and Corn of France won and played a trump. This time the
defense took both their ruffs for 500, still only worth 28 matchpoints as seven
pairs were allowed to play game and make it on the North/South cards, usually
making eleven. There were also two tables where 4
doubled made, once
with an overtrick! Board 5.
Board 5. N/S Game. Dealer North.
|
|
 |
K 5 3 2 |
|
 |
K J 5 3 |
 |
K 10 2 |
 |
9 6 |
 |
Q J 10 8 7 4 |
 |
 |
A |
 |
10 |
 |
Q 9 8 7 4 |
 |
J 9 6 |
 |
7 4 3 |
 |
10 8 4 |
 |
A Q 5 3 |
|
 |
9 6 |
|
 |
A 6 2 |
 |
A Q 8 5 |
 |
K J 7 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Morelli |
|
Vriend |
|
Abate |
|
v.d.Pas |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1NT |
|
Pass |
2 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
The leaders achieved a solid if unspectacular score when their Dutch
opponents couldn't find a way into the auction. Vriend led a club and in the
fullness of time the defense got what was its due for two down; -100 and 20
matchpoints for the Italians.
Board 6. E/W Game. Dealer East. |
|
 |
Q 5 4 |
|
 |
9 7 3 |
 |
J 8 6 |
 |
A K 10 3 |
 |
A K 10 9 3 |
 |
 |
J 6 |
 |
8 5 |
 |
A K Q 6 2 |
 |
9 3 2 |
 |
A Q 10 5 |
 |
Q 7 5 |
 |
9 6 |
|
 |
8 7 2 |
|
 |
J 10 4 |
 |
K 7 4 |
 |
J 8 4 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
Morelli |
|
Vriend |
|
Abate |
|
v.d.Pas |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Pass |
1 |
|
Pass |
|
2 |
|
Pass |
3 |
|
All Pass |
|
|
|
| |
Perhaps I misread the auction at the table because the Italian auction makes
no sense to me at all. Anyway, a heart partscore is a perfectly reasonable
resting place for all the combined 25-count.
Van der Pas led
2 and Vriend
put in the ten then played ace and king. Abate ruffed, drew three rounds of
trumps and ran
J.
Vriend won the queen and switched to a diamond but it was too late, declarer's
diamonds going away on the spades; +170 but only 19 matchpoints for the leaders.
Board 7. Game All. Dealer South. |
|
 |
A 6 4 |
|
 |
A K Q 9 8 |
 |
J 6 |
 |
10 7 2 |
 |
10 9 2 |
 |
 |
7 5 3 |
 |
10 5 4 2 |
 |
J 6 3 |
 |
10 3 2 |
 |
A K 9 |
 |
J 9 6 |
 |
A Q 4 3 |
|
 |
K Q J 8 |
|
 |
7 |
 |
Q 8 7 5 4 |
 |
K 8 5 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
K.Scherders |
|
Morelli |
|
J.Scherders |
|
Abate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
Pass |
|
1NT |
|
Pass |
|
2NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the field were in game on this one but with the big majority of them
going down +120 proved a useful score, worth 26 matchpoints to the Italians.
Job Scherders led a top diamond and switched to ace and another club.
That was ducked and Kees Scherders won and cleared the clubs. When the
defense discarded accurately, there were only eight tricks.
Board 8. Love All. Dealer West. |
|
 |
J 9 2 |
|
 |
K Q J 9 7 3 |
 |
J |
 |
10 6 2 |
 |
K 10 4 |
 |
 |
Q 8 |
 |
A 8 6 |
 |
10 2 |
 |
A 7 2 |
 |
Q 9 6 4 |
 |
J 9 7 3 |
 |
A K 8 5 4 |
|
 |
A 7 6 5 3 |
|
 |
5 4 |
 |
K 10 8 5 3 |
 |
Q |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
K.Scherders |
|
Morelli |
|
J.Scherders |
|
Abate |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
All Pass | |
3
was not
very exciting, a fairly routine +110. But with six pairs bidding and making game
and a number of other better scores the Italians scored 27, another useful
score. On the four boards we watched, they scored 92 against the average of 84.
Just in case you are feeling lazy, here are four bidding problems for you to
think about over breakfast. They all come from the first consolation session of
the Seniors pairs.
Board 5. N/S Game. Dealer North.
|
|
 |
A K 9 |
|
 |
J 7 6 3 |
 |
10 7 |
 |
J 6 3 2 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
Dble |
Pass |
|
? |
|
|
|
| |
Whilst there could be a layout where it would be right to bid 2
, the only realistic
alternatives are 1NT and 2
.
Maybe you should be influenced by the absence of a spade raise from West but
in the long run 2
figures to be a winner and that was the bid chosen at the table.
|
 |
A K 9 |
|
 |
J 7 6 3 |
 |
10 7 |
 |
J 6 3 2 |
 |
7 5 |
 |
 |
Q 8 4 3 2 |
 |
Q 9 8 5 4 2 |
 |
- |
 |
J 6 4 3 |
 |
K Q 5 2 |
 |
8 |
 |
A K 5 4 |
|
 |
J 10 6 |
|
 |
A K 10 |
 |
A 9 8 |
 |
Q 10 9 7 | |
Not, however, this time! Of course if you know your partner's style then
there is more to be said for 1NT.
Declarer escaped for one down, which was worth 13 of the 32 available
matchpoints. Playing in 1NT would have been worth at least 20.
Board 7 . Game All. Dealer South. |
|
 |
6 3 |
|
 |
A 10 9 5 3 |
 |
K 8 6 |
 |
9 8 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Pass |
|
1NT |
|
Pass |
|
2NT |
Pass |
|
? |
|
|
|
| |
Did you decide to introduce your heart suit?
|
 |
6 3 |
|
 |
A 10 9 5 3 |
 |
K 8 6 |
 |
9 8 3 |
 |
Q 4 2 |
 |
 |
9 8 7 |
 |
7 2 |
 |
Q 8 6 |
 |
Q 9 7 4 |
 |
J 10 5 3 |
 |
J 6 4 2 |
 |
A K Q |
|
 |
A K J 10 5 |
|
 |
K J 4 |
 |
A 2 |
 |
10 7 5 | |
South had an easy raise to game and East an equally obvious lead.
After cashing three clubs he switched to a spade and North got the trumps
wrong. Perhaps he should have been suspicious when East didn't switch to a
diamond but he could only cope with a 4-1 break if East had the singleton.
One down was worth only two match points. Passing 2NT or raising to game
(and not going down!) would earn more points, depending on how many tricks you
make.
Board 8 . Love All. Dealer West. |
|
 |
A K Q 9 6 |
|
 |
2 |
 |
8 5 |
 |
K 8 7 6 3 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
|
1 |
|
Pass |
|
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
? | |
A simple choice between pass and 4
.
|
 |
J 10 3 |
|
 |
A 9 6 |
 |
9 6 3 |
 |
Q 9 5 2 |
 |
8 7 5 |
 |
 |
4 2 |
 |
K Q 8 5 |
 |
J 10 7 4 3 |
 |
Q 7 2 |
 |
A K J 10 4 |
 |
A J 4 |
 |
10 |
|
 |
A K Q 9 6 |
|
 |
2 |
 |
8 5 |
 |
K 8 7 6 3 | |
South passed and collected just 5/32.
Once spades have been raised it must be right to bid on - it's even possible
you may be cold for game. As you can see, the defenders need to find at least
one club ruff to be certain of defeating the contract, and +590 is a distinct
possibility. Either way you are sure to increase your number of matchpoints by
bidding.
Board 9. E/W Game. Dealer North. |
|
 |
A K 6 2 |
|
 |
10 9 |
 |
3 |
 |
A K J 10 9 7 |
West |
|
North |
|
East |
|
South |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
Pass |
|
4 |
|
Pass |
|
? | |
Once again a raise of your suit by partner has surely improved your hand.
The obvious move is 4
which should be
enough to persuade partner to bid the excellent slam.
|
 |
7 |
|
 |
A K 8 7 |
 |
K Q J 10 |
 |
8 6 5 3 |
 |
Q 5 |
 |
 |
J 10 9 8 4 3 |
 |
Q 6 4 2 |
 |
J 5 3 |
 |
9 7 5 4 |
 |
A 8 6 2 |
 |
Q 4 2 |
 |
- |
|
 |
A K 6 2 |
|
 |
10 9 |
 |
3 |
 |
A K J 10 9 7 | |
What a cruel game bridge can be! Ten pairs managed to bid 6
and were forced to
curse their luck when the trumps were 3-0 offside.
Our South bid a simple 5
and collected an
undeserved 23/32.
Return to Top of page |
To List of Bulletins |