The Bidding Battle
By Mark Horton
The first session of the Women’s Pairs final was very much
a question of making the right bid at the right time – at
least on the deals I watched. I leave it to you the reader to judge
for example when the right bid was made at the wrong time.
Board 12. Dealer West. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 10 2
© 8 6 5 4 2
¨ 9 3
§ J 9 7 3 |
ª K 9 6
© A 10 7 3
¨ 10 7 5
§ K 10 4 |
|
ª Q J
© K Q J 9
¨ J 4
§ A Q 6 5 2 |
|
ª A 8 7 5 4 3
© -
¨ A K Q 8 6 2
§ 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Erhart |
Delogh |
Smederevac |
Avon |
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
4ª |
Dble |
Pass |
5§ |
5¨ |
5© |
All Pass |
|
|
When Maria Erhart made a card showing double of Four Spades Jovi
Smederevac did very well to bid Five Clubs. Her side was now assured
of a fine score whatever happened. The defenders cashed a spade
and two diamonds, but that was all they could take. Declarer could
cope easily with the 5-0 trump break. After one round of trumps
she cashed three top clubs followed by the king of spades and could
claim the rest via a high cross ruff. –50 was worth 26 of
the 30 available matchpoints, and at this stage the leaders had
retained their position at the top of the table.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
ª K 10 7
© A J 6 4
¨ Q J
§ A Q 8 5 |
ª 9 6 4 3
© K Q 9 7 5 3
¨ -
§ 10 9 6 |
|
ª A Q J 8 2
© 8
¨ K 10 8 7 5 4
§ 2 |
|
ª 5
© 10 2
¨ A 9 6 3 2
§ K J 7 4 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weigkricht |
Gromova |
Kellner |
Ponomareva |
|
1NT |
2¨* |
Dble* |
2ª |
Dble |
3¨ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Two Diamonds promised spades and South made a card showing double.
If East had passed Two Spades would South have moved? You certainly
need to, as East is a certainty to make at least eight tricks, should
make nine, and might come to ten against inaccurate defence. It
seemed strange for North to remove her partner’s double, but
in a sense she was right to do so. However, 3NT would have been
the winning choice. Five Clubs had no real chance. West led the
nine of spades and East won and switched to the king of diamonds.
West ruffed and had to come to a heart trick. That was worth 26/30
for the Austrian pair, who were well in the hunt for a medal.
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª Q 8 6 5
© K 7 6 5
¨ 10 5 3
§ 10 7 |
ª J 9
© A 9 4
¨ Q J 9 4 2
§ 9 6 2 |
|
ª K 10 3 2
© -
¨ A 8 7 6
§ K Q 8 5 3 |
|
ª A 7 4
© Q J 10 8 3 2
¨ K
§ A J 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weigkricht |
Gromova |
Kellner |
Ponomareva |
|
|
1ª* |
2© |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
Pass |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
One Spade was the start of a potential Canapé, but East
decided not to bid over Three Hearts. However, when South went on
to game East decided it was time to come again.
That was not a good idea here, with Four Hearts due to fail, but
if you are going bid then 4NT must be best, suggesting that you
are playable in both minors. Five Clubs proved to be a very uncomfortable
spot.
Declarer won the opening heart lead with the ace, pitching a spade
and took the diamond finesse. Forced at trick two she tried the
queen of clubs. West won and played a third heart. Declarer ruffed,
cashed the king of clubs and played diamonds. West bided her time,
and eventually came in with the ace of spades, drew declarer’s
last trump and cashed a heart. +500 and 26/30.
The young Danish pair were doing well, but they didn’t cope
well with this board:
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª 6 3 2
© A Q 8 7
¨ K Q J 8 4 3
§ - |
ª A Q 10 8 7
© 9 3
¨ 7 5
§ A K 10 9 |
|
ª J 5
© K 5 4 2
¨ 6
§ 8 7 6 5 4 3 |
|
ª K 9 4
© J 10 6
¨ A 10 9 2
§ Q J 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Simons |
Krefeld |
Pasman |
Kirstan |
|
1¨ |
Pass |
2NT* |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Three Hearts showed more than a minimum and in theory no singletons.
West cashed the ace of clubs and then switched to a diamond. Declarer
won in hand and played the jack of hearts. West followed with the
three – maybe the nine would be better? – and East won
and returned a club. +50 was worth 21/9.
The Netherlands had qualified several pairs and one of them was
having an excellent session.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª A J 9 3
© Q 6 4
¨ Q J 9
§ Q J 8 |
ª 6 5
© 8
¨ A 6 5 3
§ K 10 9 5 4 3 |
|
ª K 4
© A K J 10 3 2
¨ K 10 8 7 4
§ - |
|
ª Q 10 8 7 2
© 9 7 5
¨ 2
§ A 7 6 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Van Zwol |
Belogh |
Hoogweg |
Avon |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
1ª |
Dble |
3ª |
4¨ |
All Pass |
Missing this game was very expensive, giving East/West only 5 points.
Where does the blame lie? Well, I don’t think there is any
case for West to take another bid, so East must accept responsibility.
When partner has shown some cards it is surely right to simply bid
Four Hearts over Three Spades. Assuming you buy the hand eleven
tricks are possible and would be worth 24/30.
Board 21. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 3 2
© K 8 7 5 4 2
¨ 3
§ A J 6 3 |
ª J 10
© 10 6 3
¨ K Q J 7 2
§ Q 8 2 |
|
ª A K Q 5
© Q J 9
¨ A 10 6 5 4
§ 4 |
|
ª 9 8 7 6 4
© A
¨ 9 8
§ K 10 9 7 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Van Zwol |
Belogh |
Hoogweg |
Avon |
|
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
3§* |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
3© |
Dble |
3ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
North chose a singularly unfortunate moment to protect. Declarer
had to get the clubs right to escape with –500, but that did
not trouble the scorer.
|