The Defence of the Millenium
By Michael Rosenblum
The Scottish team is not near the top of the table so the Russians
were delighted/disappointed to meet a perfect defence produced by
Harold Bergson and David McCrossan in our Round 15 encounter.
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª J 5
© J 9 2
¨ A 4 3
§ A Q 9 7 5 |
ª A 6
© Q 8 6
¨ K 10 9 7 6 5 2
§ 2 |
|
ª K 10 8
© 10 7 3
¨ J
§ K J 10 8 4 3 |
|
ª Q 9 7 4 3 2
© A K 5 4
¨ Q 8
§ 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Bergson |
Andreev |
McCrossan |
Romanovich |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
One Club was Polish, 2§ checkback, and 2¨ showed a minimum with
only two spades.
McCrossan led the jack of clubs against 3NT and Andreev won the
queen. Being afraid of a singleton spade honour with East, Andreev
led the ª5 to the next trick and McCrossan produced the ten! If
he instead plays the ª8, declarer will put in dummy's nine and make
his contract easily. However, Andreev had to cover the ª10 with
the queen. Bergson won the ace and switched to the queen of hearts.
Declarer won with the ace and led a spade to his jack, East ducking.
Now declarer was in trouble. Of course, he could make his contract
by finding an endplay against East, but he decided to play instead
for the ¨K to be in the right place. Andreev played a heart to the
king then a spade to East's king, discarding a club from hand. Winning
the heart return with his jack, he tried a diamond to the queen
and the contract was one off.
The non-executed brilliancy
By Christer Andersson
I was sitting down behind the Danish player Boye Henriksen to watch
the interesting match between Denmark and Italy in the Junior series.
Before play started, Boye turned around and told me that his partner
had nearly found a brilliant defence earlier that day in the match
between Denmark and Germany. It was the third board in Round 13:
Board 3. Dealer South. East/West Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 9 8
© 10 9 4
¨ 6 2
§ Q 7 3 2 |
ª K J 7 6 2
© A 6 3
¨ Q 3
§ A 6 4 |
|
ª Q 4
© Q 7
¨ A K J 8 5 4
§ 10 9 5 |
|
ª 5 3
© K J 8 5 2
¨ 10 9 7
§ K J 8 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3ª* |
Pass |
3ª* |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Boye Henriksen, North, led the ©10
for the queen and king. Declarer having only eight winners had to
duck to break up the defenders' communications. Kjaere Gjaldbaek
returned the ©J,
declarer wrongly (in theory) putting up the ace, and Boye forgetting
to discard his blocking nine. South now had an easy ride for ten
tricks. The correct declarer play would be to withhold the ace until
the third round of hearts. The defence still may prevail but South
has to find the right continuation at trick three. And that is not
very easy from his position.
It would, however, have been possible for North. With the bidding
in mind, and seeing the dummy and the development of the play, he
could foresee that there is no time for the defence both to dislodge
the ©A from declarer
and create an entry to partner's hand. The only way to beat the
contract seems to be to find three tricks in another suit, which
would be possible were South to hold the right cards in clubs. Thus,
a switch to clubs after the second heart would make the day for
the defence. But how should poor South know that a high card from
§KJ8 would be the
winning defence at trick three.
The problem would have been resolved had Gjaldbeak trusted in partner
having the low heart sequence (©109x)
and continued with the ©8
instead of the ©J
at trick two. Of course, Boye Henriksen has to be awake and overtake
the eight with the nine in case declarer ducks. Furthermore, he
has to read the significance of the heart eight and switch to a
low club and promote the setting trick.
If all this had happened, it truly would have been a brilliant
defence. Getting rid of all those ifs is, after all, what the game
is all about. But only seeing you were close to making the extraordinary
play gives a warm feeling inside. Doesn't it?
Although the Danes allowed the contract to make with an overtrick,
the board was not expensive for the team. The declarer in the other
room was in the same contract and received the same lead. He chose
to win won the first trick and succeeded to sneak a spade through.
When the ªQ won,
he took his nine tricks and ran for home.
Turkish Delight
Board 6. Dealer East. East/West
Vul. |
|
ª
9
© Q 10 8 5 4
3
¨ J 9 4
§ A 6 2 |
ª
A
© K 6 2
¨ A K 8 2
§ K 10 7 5 3 |
|
ª
6 5 3
© A J 9 7
¨ 10 7 6
§ J 9 4 |
|
ª
K Q J 10 8 7 4 2
© -
¨ Q 5 3
§ Q 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Suicmez |
Ginossar |
Sakrak |
|
|
Pass |
4ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Israel's Ophir Reshef led ¨K,
on which Turkey's Ozgur Sakrak made the expert false card of the
queen. West's ©2
switch went to the ace, ruffed. A low spade lost to the ace, and
Reshef cashed ¨A
and cleared the diamonds. Ozgur Sakrak ruffed a heart back to hand
and ran off all his spades. Reshef was squeezed in hearts and clubs,
being forced to bare his king of clubs, hoping that his partner
had the queen. At trick thirteen, §Q
was declarer's tenth trick; 590 to Turkey.
That was a big dividend for the false card at the first trick.
Had Ozgur Sakrak played low at trick one, West could safely have
continued diamonds, and in the endgame East would have controlled
the heart suit, preventing the squeeze. Playing standard defensive
signals, West thought he needed to switch at trick two, but from
¨107653, his partner
would have played the three, so perhaps he should have worked out
that a diamond continuation was safe.
Although he avoided the fatal club switch at trick two, his heart
switch turned out no better when his partner not unreasonably played
©A in case ©2
was a singleton.
Martin's Work-out
By Stefan Back
Usually when we talk about sports and work-out, we have some sessions
at the local gym in mind. In bridge all the work-out is, more or
less, done with the brain. In the Juniors Round 15 match against
the Czech Republic, Germany's Martin Stoszek made good use of his
'little grey cells' to collect all the information that was spread
around the table to draw the right conclusion:
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
ª 9 7 3
© 3
¨ A K 8 5
§ A K Q 10 3 |
ª J 6 4 2
© Q J 4
¨ 6 4
§ J 9 5 4 |
|
ª A Q 10 8 5
© K 10 7 6
¨ Q 2
§ 8 2 |
|
ª K
© A 9 8 5 2
¨ J 10 9 7 3
§ 7 6 |
Stoszek was South and heard his partner Jenny Ewald open the bidding
with 1§. East bid
1ª and he doubled
to show hearts. West bid 2ª,
alerted as a very weak raise and North was happy to introduce her
diamonds at the three level. As 2NT would have shown any weak hand,
3¨ promised a decent
16+ count.
West passed and Martin tried 3ª
to inquire about a spade stopper. When West passed to show an honour,
North bid 4§ to
deny values in spades. Here is the bidding so far:
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Ewald |
|
Stoszek |
|
1§ |
1ª |
Dble |
2ª |
3¨ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
? |
What did he know so far? As East/West hadn't bid spades higher
than the two-level, he expected them to hold no more than nine cards
in that suit, therefore it was very likely that North held a 3-1-4-5
(or better) with almost all the points in the minors.
Martin now jumped straight away to 6¨
- not bad on a combined 21-count, if you subtract that 'useful'
ªK for a moment.
When diamonds broke 2-2, Jenny Ewald had no problem
in wrapping up 12 tricks to give Germany +1370 and a healthy 15
IMPs, when their opponents in the other room reached only 3§
scoring one overtrick for +130.
By the way, if you would like to know who our bidding hero is, his
photo appeared under the pseudonym 'Janko Katerbau' in yesterday's
issue of the Daily Bulletin.
Biggest Swing so Far?
Schools Round 8. Netherlands
v Italy
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª 10
© 9 8 7 6 2
¨ J 7 5 4 3
§ J 3 |
ª 7
© J 4 3
¨ 10 9 2
§ A Q 10 8 7 6 |
|
ª A K Q J 9 6 4 2
© -
¨ 6
§ K 9 5 4 |
|
ª 8 5 3
© A K Q 10 5
¨ A K Q 8
§ 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
De Pagter |
|
Bob Drijver |
|
Pass |
4ª |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
5ª |
6¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
6ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
4NT showed any two suiter, usually 5-5. Over 6¨ Bob Drijver had
a choice between double (Lightner, trying to get a ruff) or 6ª,
as pass is for wimps. He went all the way and drew a glorious fit
in clubs from Vincent de Pagter, just what the doctor ordered. South's
pass was forcing, as North/South had freely bid a slam and East
appeared to be sacrificing. ©K was led and declarer claimed 1310.
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Verbeek |
|
Molenaar |
|
Pass |
4¨ |
4© |
4ª |
5© |
5ª |
6© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
East began proceedings with Namyats, 4¨ showing a good 4ª opening
bid. West doubled prematurely in front of his partner, seduced by
the Namyats into thinking that his partner would provide some defence.
ª7 went to the ace and ¨6 was returned. That was 1210 to Netherlands.
1210 plus 1310 is 2520; 21 IMPs to Netherlands.
East's singleton diamond at trick two was not wise when he had
no trumps to ruff diamonds anyway. The best defence is to promote
©J by playing a second spade, not easy to find as the pips give
no clues that ª7 is a singleton. More realistic is for East to cash
§K at trick two, East discouraging with §6, with East trusting that
this means that West wants something other than clubs, and thus
playing a spade for plus 300.
This hand is also covered in the Juniors report of this session.
Session 10 - Juniors: Hungary
v Denmark
By Peter Gill
Board 9. Dealer North. East/West Vul.
|
|
ª 10 6
© 10 4
¨ Q 10 9 7 4
§ Q 8 6 5 |
ª Q 3 2
© Q J 9
¨ A 8 6
§ K 9 7 4 |
|
ª A K J 9 8 5
© 7 6
¨ J 5 2
§ A 10 |
|
ª 7 4
© A K 8 5 3 2
¨ K 3
§ J 3 2 |
Tom Cornelis of Belgium was the first correspondent to point out
that, at the tables where North/South were silent, there is more
to this hand than I (PG) realised. After ©A, ©K, heart ruff/overruff
and two top trumps, North is known to have nine cards in the minors.
On the second trump North perforce has to discard a diamond, suggesting
a 2=2=5=4 shape. East therefore cashes two more spades to 'trump
squeeze' North. If North pitches a club, the clubs can be ruffed
good, and if North pitches diamonds, the diamonds split 2-2 and
East's third diamond can be established.
Tom also points out that on Vugraph, declarer ran the ten of clubs,
which works. However, he is adamant that the trump squeeze is the
best line of play. He does not discuss the best play if North is
known from the bidding to have five or six diamonds, but the Hungarians
have provide some information; see below.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gjaldbaek |
Marjai |
Henriksen |
Hegedus |
2¨ |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Previously I suggested that after ©A, ©K, heart ruff/overruff and
ªA, the hand is a textbook hand, as one can cross to ªQ, ruff the
last club and play ace and another diamond to receive a ruff and
discard.
That is too simplistic, as the hand can be counted. South has two
spades, six hearts and, once North has opened 2¨, either one or
two diamonds. If the former, he has four clubs to make a total of
thirteen cards, and thus the best approach is to endplay South with
the fourth club, making 4ª whenever South has a singleton diamond.
If North follows suit with the last club, the back-up plan is to
endplay South with a doubleton diamond honour. Thus declarer seems
to have two strings in his bow. That was Boje Henriksen's plan.
The Hungarian npc Peter Gal furthermore reports that after ©A,
©K and a third heart ruffed and over-ruffed, Boje Henriksen cashed
ªA, §A then §K, ruffed a club and cashed ªQ. Next came ¨A, and the
fourth club. Does anyone see that even this sequence of play is
imperfect?
It seems to be better than the play at the other table in one way,
as it covers all 6-1 diamond breaks, including when South has a
bare honour. On the other hand, it does not cover South having a
small doubleton diamond and North having ¨KQxxx, which the other
table did cover by exiting with a small diamond from dummy after
one club ruff and the two top spades.
However, when declarer cashed ¨A, Gai Hegedus made the excellent
play of ¨K under Boje's ace! If one assumes that this is a true
card, then either ¨K is singleton in which case the fourth club
will endplay South, or ¨KQ is doubleton in which case South will
be thrown in a trick later with ¨Q. If South discards his potential
¨Q on the fourth club, ¨J is a winner.
Thus Henriksen stuck with his plan, leading the fourth club. When
North had §Q, East had to ruff, but now he was stuck in his hand
and had to concede two diamonds. Had he visualised earlier that
Hegedus would play ¨K under the ace from ¨Kx, he would have won
the second spade with the king rather than the ace, preserving an
entry to dummy to play fro ¨Q onside.
Another possibility is for South to discard ¨K on the fourth club,
but Hegedus' play is better as he does not know that declarer is
not planning a diamond endplay with North holding ¨QJ.
Finally, someone suggested that the percentage play in the club
suit is probably low to the ten. However, there seem to be inadequate
entries to dummy for that. Enough.
|