After only a few boards, we saw new leaders. Cieslak-Moszynski,
who were already leading the field if the carryover is not
taken into consideration, finally took over the lead in the
official rankings as well. This morning, they had a good,
be it sometimes lucky session. Here are some more boards from
it.
On board 12, they bid very aggressively to a thin game which
was just on when both major suits broke decently.
|
|
J.
Cieslak |
Board 12, Dealer West,
North-South Vul.
|
|
ª 9 8 5
© J 7
¨ J 7 6 4
§ K J 9 7 |
ª K Q 6 4 2
© K 9 5
¨ 3
§ A Q 10 5 |
|
ª J 3
© A Q T 6 3
¨ 10 9 8 5 2
§ 6 |
|
ª A 10 7
© 8 4 2
¨ A K Q
§ 8 4 3 2 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cieslak |
Lesniewski |
Moszynski |
Martens |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
2§
was explained at the table as a non-minimum hand, hence East's bold
jump to game. As only four pairs were in game and made it, the leaders
scored 49 out of 52 matchpoints here.
On board 19, the leaders again did well:
Board 19, Dealer South,
East-West Vul.
|
|
ª Q 10 9 5
© 7 3 2
¨ -
© A K Q 6 4 2 |
ª A 6
© J 9
¨ Q 10 8 4 3 2
§ 8 5 3 |
|
ª 2
© K Q 10 8 6 4
¨ A K 9 5
§ 10 7 |
|
ª K J 8 7 4 3
© A 5
¨ J 7 6
§ J 9 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cieslak |
Haller |
Moszynski |
Laanemae |
|
|
|
Pass |
2¨ |
3§ |
3© |
3ª |
Double |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
EW might have saved here in 5¨
vulnerable against not for only 200. When Cieslak led a heart, Laanemae
could make only 11 tricks for a poor score (10-42), as many pairs
went on and got doubled in the process.
On board 21, David Birman brought the leaders'
good run to a sudden halt when he was one out of eight declarers
to bring home a bold 6NT.
Board 21, Dealer North,
North-South Vul.
|
|
ª K 4
© J 9 4
¨ K Q J 8 2
§ A 9 5 |
ª J 7 5
© K Q 10 8 3
¨ 10 7
§ 7 4 2 |
|
ª 9 8 6 3
© 2
¨ 6 5 4 3
§ K 10 8 3 |
|
ª A Q 10 2
© A 7 6 5
¨ A 9
§ Q J 6 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cieslak |
Birman |
Moszynski |
Zeligman |
|
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
2© |
Pass |
Pass |
3© |
Double |
4¨ |
Pass |
6NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Miszynski led a heart, an obvious singleton.
So David Birman could win the ace and run the §Q.
Moszynski won his king, but had no hearts left. He returned the
ª8 on which declarer
played low from dummy, winning in hand with the king. After cashing
all his minor suit winners he then had to guess where the ªJ
was: oroginally third with West or with East's four-card suit. After
an agonising huddle he guessed right and could chalk up 1440. Well
done.
On board 23, a tactical move paid off for
the leaders.
Board 23, Dealer South,
All Vul.
|
|
ª K Q J 9 7 3 2
© 8 7
¨ K 9 7
§ 8 |
ª 5
© A K Q J 9 4 3
¨ J 4
§ K J 3 |
|
ª A 10 6
© 10 6 2
¨ Q 10 2
§ A 6 5 4 |
|
ª 8 4
© 5
¨ A 8 6 5 3
§ Q 10 9 7 2 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cieslak |
Janssen |
Moszynski |
Wens |
|
|
|
Pass |
4©
(!?) |
4ª |
5© |
Double |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Certainly in second position, opening 4©
would not have been everybody's choice. North made a light overcall
which deceived his partner when he had to find the proper action
over the automatic 5©.
The double was not a success and the leaders could add another clear
top.
The other board at this table was probably
the most interesting board of the session.
Board 24, Dealer West,
None Vul.
|
|
ª A 9 2
© A 10 2
¨ A 9 3
§ A K Q 2 |
ª 7 4
© K Q J 8
¨ 8 2
§ J 10 9 7 5 |
|
ª 10 8 3
© 7 6 5 4 3
¨ Q J 10 7 5
§ - |
|
ª K Q J 6 5
© 9
¨ K 6 4
§ 8 6 4 3 |
|
The easy contract to play is 6NT. Just duck the heart lead and claim,
as this very much looks like developing into an automatic double squeeze.
As the cards lay, only West will be squeezed, but that does not affect
the recommended line of play. Win the second heart and cash the spades,
followed by a top club (bad news) and the ¨AK.
The interesting contract to play is 6ª.
Of course, you can play as if you were in 6NT, as for example
Dano de Falco did. He ducked the first heart, but then got
a club ruff...
Bas Drijver from the Netherlands adopted a different plan.
He won the first heart, drew trumps (this looks a good idea...)
and cashed a top club. When he got the bad news, he simply
ducked a diamond to rectify the count for the simple squeeze
on West. Nicely done.
Please note that a club lead always defeats the spade slam
on the immediate ruff. After that, you will have to duck a
diamond as well to go down only one trick.
|
|
J. Moszynski
|
On the last board of the session, the leaders
further increased their lead when their opponents helped them into
the best contract:
Board 26, Dealer East,
All Vul.
|
|
ª 5 4 3
© A Q J 7
¨ 9 8 4 2
§ K 10 |
ª K J
© 8 3
¨ J 10 7 6 5
§ Q J 8 2 |
|
ª A 9 7 6
© K 9
¨ A K
§ 9 7 6 5 3 |
|
ª Q 10 8 2
© 10 6 5 4 2
¨ Q 3
§ A 4 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cieslak |
Garvey |
Moszynski |
Carroll |
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
Well, in 2¨
you can score 8 or 9 tricks and with the ¨Q
coming down there also are eight tricks at no-trumps. With clubs
as trumps, 10 tricks is the limit, 130 beating all 120's and 110's.
So we can only say that South's balancing action was the stepping
stone EW needed to reach the top spot once again: -90 is worth 39.5
to NS, -100 brings them 33.3 and -130 meant NS had to be content
with only 14.6 mp.
|