Sweden v
Israel – Juniors Round 15
After 14 rounds of the Juniors Championship, Sweden and Israel
lay fifth and sixth respectively, right on the age of the qualification
zone and well in touch with the medal positions. Their meeting in
Round 15 could have a big effect on the fortunes of the two teams.
Board 2. N/S Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª Q J 7 6
© A Q J 7
¨ A 4 2
§ Q 8 |
ª A 8 4
© 8 5
¨ J 9 5 3
§ K J 5 2 |
|
ª K 10 9 5 3
© 9 4 2
¨ 10 6
§ A 4 3 |
|
ª 2
© K 10 6 3
¨ K Q 8 7
§ 10 9 7 6 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
- |
- |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
A slight diefference in no trump range decided this deal, as Salomonsson/Malmstrom
play 14-16 and Hoffman/Ofir 15-17. That made it safer for Gilad
Ofir to make a move than for Per-Erik Malmstrom, and Ofir duly did
so while Malmstron passed – two normal decisions, I would
think.
After a spade lead, Daniel Salomonsson had eight tricks in 1NT
for +120.
Daniel Sivelind led a trump against Ron Hoffman's heart game. Hoffman
won the jack in hand and played the §8, losing to the jack. He won
the heart continuation and gave up a second club, this time to Sivelind's
ace, and back came a third trump. The ruffing club finesse succeeded
and now Hoffman played a spade towards his hand. If this is ducked
and goes to queen and king, the ace can be ruffed out as Kjell Ericsson
had to throw a spade on the third round of trumps. In practice he
took the ªA and now the ruffing finesse produced Hoffman's tenth
trick for +620 and 11 IMPs to Israel.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª K 7 3
© K 6 2
¨ 9 8 6 4 2
§ 8 7 |
ª A 10
© A Q 10 9
¨ A K J 3
§ J 9 5 |
|
ª Q 6 4
© J 8 5 4
¨ 10 7 5
§ A 6 4 |
|
ª J 9 8 5 2
© 7 3
¨ Q
§ K Q 10 3 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
1NT |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Two different opening bids led to two quite different auctions,
though the final contracts were identical. Both South players had
got involved, with Malmstrom having shown clubs and Ofir both black
suits.
Against Ginossar, Malmstrom led the §K, which declarer won with
the ace. Ginossar took the heart finesse and Salomonsson won and
returned a club to the queen, taking his ruff a moment later. There
was a spade to come for down one; 100.
Ofir led his singleton diamond against Sivelind and declarer won
and played ace and another heart. He lost to the ©K but could win
the return, draw the last trump and discard a club on the fourth
diamond, so then had just one club and one spade to lose; +620 and
12 IMPs to Sweden.
Board 4. All Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª 9 6 2
© 3
¨ 7 4 3
§ Q J 6 5 4 3 |
ª K 5 3
© K 10 7
¨ K 10 9 8 6 5
§ 7 |
|
ª Q 10 8
© A Q 9 6 5 2
¨ Q J 2
§ 2 |
|
ª A J 7 4
© J 8 4
¨ A
§ A K 10 9 8 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
Pass |
Pass |
2¨ |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
4§ |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
Dble |
4© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
The double-figure swings were coming thick and fast as a third
one came along on successive deals.
Ginossar opened a multi in third seat while Sivelind's methods
dictated a natural weak two bid (given that he chose to open pre-emptively).
Malmstrom doubled the multi and Ophir Reshef jumped to 3©, pass
or correct. When Malmstrom doubled again, Salomonsson toom out to
4§, where he played. There were two spades and a heart to be lost;
+130.
Ofir doubled the weak 2© opening and doubled again when Ericsson
raised to 4©. Should Hoffman have converted to 5§? Well, that contract
would have failed by a trick, and there was a defence to defeat
4©. That defence was found in another match when Harold Bergson
for Scotland cashed the ¨A then underled his clubs to put partner,
David McCrossan in to give him a diamond ruff for down one in the
Scots' match against Russia. Well done to them. But it was not found
in this match, where Ofir started with a top club and no longer
had any way to get to his partner's hand; +790 for Sivelind and
14 IMPs to Sweden, who led by 26-11.
Things calmed down for a while and the score had only moved on
to 35-19 in Sweden's favour after twelve deals, then:
Board 13. All Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª A 4
© K J 10 7 4
¨ A K
§ 9 8 7 2 |
ª K J 2
© Q 9
¨ Q J 10 9 7 3
§ K 5 |
|
ª Q 9 7 6 3
© 5 2
¨ 8 6 5 2
§ 10 3 |
|
ª 10 8 5
© A 8 6 3
¨ 4
§ A Q J 6 4 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
- |
1© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
- |
1© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Both Souths showed a forcing heart raise but later Ofir suggested
clubs as an alternative trump suit while the Swedes stayed in hearts.
It is not that there is anything inherently superior about the club
slam as opposed to playing in hearts, just that a different defender
was on lead and chose to lead a different suit. Against 6©, Ginossar
led a spade from queen to five and that beat the contract, despite
declarer's successful trump view, as he had to lose a spade when
the club finesse failed; down one for –100. Ericsson had been
dealt a diamond sequence amd led that against 6§. This time declarer
needed only to pick up the hearts, which Ofir duly did, and the
spade loser went away on the fifth heart and ¨K; +1370 and 16 IMPs
to Israel to tie the match at 35-35.
Board 15. N/S Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª J 8 7 5 4
© J 6 2
¨ Q J 2
§ 10 3 |
ª A 9 3 2
© 10 9 8 7
¨ -
§ K 8 7 6 4 |
|
ª K 6
© A K 3
¨ A 8 7 6
§ Q J 5 2 |
|
ª Q 10
© Q 5 4
¨ K 10 9 5 4 3
§ A 9 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
- |
- |
- |
1¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
- |
- |
- |
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
North's decision to pass or respond made no difference to the final
contract, though you might think that the Israeli East/West had
it slightly easier after Salomonsson's pass. Malmstrom led a low
diamond against Ginossar and declarer ducked the jack. Now Salomonsson
decided to get cute and returned the ¨2 instead of the queen. It
is not obvious why this seemed a good idea to him and it set up
a misdefence that gave the contract. Malmstrom won the ¨9 and, not
thinking it mattered, returned a low diamond to the queen. When
Ginossar ducked again the diamonds were dead. Salomonsson switched
to a heart but Ginossar won and knocked out the §A to establish
nine tricks for +400. Of course, Malmstrom could have save dthe
day, had it occurred to him that he needed to do so. He could have
led the ¨K to the third trick, pinning his partner's queen and retaining
the lead, but why should he have to think of that?
At the other table the defence led a diamond to the jack, ¨Q and
a third diamond; two down for 100 and 11 IMPs to Israel.
Board 16. E/W Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª 5 3
© Q 7 4 2
¨ 8 6 2
§ Q 9 8 4 |
ª A Q 10 9
© J 9 8 6 3
¨ J
§ K J 2 |
|
ª K J 7 2
© K
¨ A Q 9 7 3
§ 7 6 3 |
|
ª 8 6 4
© A 10 5
¨ K 10 5 4
§ A 10 5 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Reshef |
Salomonsson |
Ginossar |
Malmstrom |
1© |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ericsson |
Hoffman |
Sivelind |
Ofir |
1© |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
Ericsson could reverse into spades without showing extra values
while Reshef could not. What that did was to make different players
declarer in the eventual contract of 4ª.
Hoffman led a club against Ericsson and Ofir won the ace and returned
the suit. Ericsson went up with the §K and led diamond to teh ace
then a heart to king and ace. The defence cashed the club winner
and switched to a trump. Ericsson was a ruff short now whichever
red suit he tried to establish. He was down one for 100.
Malmstrom led ace and another club against Ginossar, who also went
up with the king at trick two, but played a heart immediately. The
defence took its club trick but failed to find a trump switch declarer
could crossruff his way to ten tricks for +620 and another 12 IMPs
to Israel.
Their strong second-half performance resulted in Israel winning
the match by 74-41 IMPs, converting to a very useful 22-8 VPs against
a major rival.
|