Qualification
Swiss, Round 1
Section winners in the Round Robin were awarded 8 V.P. before the
start of the Swiss part of the qualification phase, which meant
that section winners would have to meet in the first round. Two
of them were Kalish from Israel and Welland from the States, two
six-player squads that had done well enough during the Round Robin.
Those who were hoping for a spectacular match were not to be disappointed,
though (or because?) the bridge was not always in accordance with
the possibilities offered by the cards. Take for example the first
board:
Board 11. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª K Q 8 7 2
© K Q 10 8
¨ J 9 6
§ 8 |
ª A J 9 6
© A J 7 5
¨ A 10 3 2
§ 10 |
|
ª 5
© 9 4
¨ K 8 4
§ A K Q 9 5 4 3 |
|
ª 10 4 3
© 6 3 2
¨ Q 7 5
§ J 7 6 2 |
Without a heart lead, 6§ will make if the trumps break, but would
you really want to be in it? In the Open Room, they certainly would
not:
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
|
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
As East never bothered to really show his good suit, the Israelis
stayed on firm ground and scored +430.
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
|
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
Here, Rosenberg wanted to make the best of his nice suit, but this
was the wrong moment. When there was a trump loser, the contract
had no play. Kalish another +100 and 11 IMP’s.
Or:
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª 9 6 4
© Q 10 8 6 2
¨ K 8 2
§ A J |
ª A K Q 10 7 5 3
© A 7 3
¨ 4
§ K 5 |
|
ª -
© K 5
¨ A 9 6 5 3
§ 10 9 8 7 4 2 |
|
ª J 8 2
© J 9 4
¨ Q J 10 7
§ Q 6 3 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Well, maybe, a slam is on when partner has exactly the right cards,
but never play him for that, the old thumb rule states! Another
safe contract for the Herbsts and Kalish scored another +420.
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
5NT |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
|
The light 2§ opening did not work well for Zia and Rosenberg. Apparently,
the latter expected a much better hand, but the contract really
had no play. When the §A was offside Zia was down two for another
+100 to Kalish, 11 more IMP’s to them.
And:
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 10 5
© J 10 8 7 6 5 2
¨ 5 3
§ J 3 |
ª A K J 7 4 3
© 4
¨ K Q 10 9
§ A 10 |
|
ª Q 9 6
© K
¨ A 8
§ Q 9 8 7 5 4 2 |
|
ª 8 2
© A Q 9 3
¨ J 7 6 4 2
§ K 6 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6ª |
|
|
|
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Both rooms reached the same contract, which is not so good. About
the only legitimate chance is to find a singleton §K somewhere (or
the §J bare with North). When this did not come off, the slam was
one down. No swing.
Several declarers made the slam, however. They simply called for
the §Q from dummy, intending to run it. As a few South players failed
to cover, a few North players felt really unhappy…
The slams thus ended up 2,5 – 0,5 for Kalish. Over now to
the lesser hands:
Board 18. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª Q 8 4
© A K 8
¨ K J 8
§ A K 10 9 |
ª K J 10
© 10 7 4
¨ Q 10 9 6 2
§ J 6 |
|
ª A 9 7 5 3
© J 6 3
¨ 7
§ 7 5 4 2 |
|
ª 6 2
© Q 9 5 2
¨ A 5 4 3
§ Q 8 3 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Dble |
1ª |
2© |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West led the ªK from his KJ10, which held, and continued the jack.
After giving it some thought, Welland covered this with the queen
from dummy, and that was the end of the defence. His explanation
was that he could not believe East to bid only 1ª, holding A10xxxx.
Right he was, and his team scored +630.
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Dble |
1ª |
2© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Here, East was on lead but he preferred to lead the ¨7, partner’s
suit, instead of a spade. So Doron Yaldin had a easy ride to 11
tricks and 1 IMP more.
Finally, Welland recorded a favourable swing of any size too:
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q
© A Q 9 7 5
¨ A 6 4
§ Q 9 5 4 |
ª A J 8 7
© K 4 2
¨ 9 7 5 3
§ 10 7 |
|
ª 10 9 5 3 2
© 8
¨ K Q J 10 8
§ A 8 |
|
ª K 6 4
© J 10 6 3
¨ 2
§ K J 6 3 2 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
2© |
4© |
4ª |
5© |
Dble |
All Pass |
Ophir Herbst was unaware of the double fit that made his defensive
assets less valuable. To make things worse, West ducked the low
spade led from dummy halfway through the hand, so an overtrick was
born. Welland +750.
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
1ª |
4© |
4ª |
5© |
All Pass |
|
Nothing special here; as Rosenberg had overcalled just 1ª he was
not tempted as he could leave the final password to Zia. Kalish
+450 here so 7 IMP’s to Welland.
On the last board, Kalish increased their lead substantially:
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª J 4
© Q 3 2
¨ Q 7 6 3
§ 10 9 7 3 |
ª 9 6 5 3
© K 10
¨ A J 8 2
§ Q 8 6 |
|
ª A K Q
© J 9 8 6 5
¨ 10 5
§ K J 2 |
|
ª 10 8 7 2
© A 7 4
¨ K 9 4
§ A 5 4 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
I. Herbst |
Fallenius |
O. Herbst |
Welland |
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
2ª enquiered about the shape and 3ª showed the 3-5-2-3. When Welland
made the rather unlucky lead of the ¨9, play was easy enough. The
ten was allowed to win the trick and declarer just had to establish
the hearts to ensure his contract. Kalish +600.
Closed Room: |
Zia |
D. Yadlin |
Rosenberg |
I. Yadlin |
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
All Pass |
The NT range made it impossible for EW here to find their game
contract, so they settled for 2ª.
Which made with an overtrick. 10 IMP’s to Kalish who had
won 33-15 or 20-10 V.P.
|