| 
             Like an Open Book 
            By Christer Andersson 
            Card reading is greatly simplified by hardcore information from 
              the opponents. Opposing signals are often not to be trusted but 
              information from the bidding is more often reliable. In Israel's 
              match against Poland (Juniors Round 19), Dror Lellouche drew inferences 
              from a bid showing distribution to land his game contract: 
            
             
              
| 
Board 15. Dealer South. All Vul.
 | 
 
|   | 
ª J 3 2 
© A J 8 5 4 
¨ K 6 5	 
§ Q 2 | 
 
ª Q 9 6 
© K Q 9 6 3 
¨ - 
§ K J 8 7 3 | 
                  | 
ª K 7 
© 10 7 2 
¨ J 10 9 7 3 
§ 9 5 4 | 
|   | 
ª A 10 8 5 4 
© - 
¨ A Q 8 4 2 
§ A 10 6 | 
 
 
            
             
              
| Open Room | 
 
| West | 
North | 
East | 
South | 
 
| K. Kotorowicz | 
Hoffman | 
J. Kotorowicz | 
Lellouche | 
 
                |   | 
                  | 
                  | 
1ª | 
 
| 2ª | 
Dble | 
3§ | 
Pass | 
 
| Pass | 
3ª | 
Pass | 
3NT | 
 
| Pass | 
4ª | 
All Pass | 
                   | 
 
 
            Over Lellouche's 1ª opening, West showed a two-suited hand 
              with hearts and a minor, weak (0-11 HCP) or strong (16 HCP+). East's 
              3§ was a sign-off in partner's minor assuming the weaker type 
              of hand. 
            West lead the ©K, 
              Lellouche putting up the ace on the table and discarding a losing 
              club from hand. A trump was played and declarer guessed to play 
              the ten from hand. West won the trick with the queen and returned 
              the six. Finding it highly unlikely that West had played a trump 
              from the king, Lellouche followed small from the table and saw East 
              contributing his king. Already at this stage a 3-5-0-5 distribution 
              was likely in the West seat. To confirm his suspicion, Lellouche 
              won the king with the ace, and followed up with another trump to 
              the jack in dummy and a diamond to hand. East discarded a discouraging 
              club on the last spade and West another club on the diamonds. Having 
              confirmed his suspicion about the distribution, Lellouche took both 
              his trump winners and continued with ace and king of diamonds, carefully 
              noting which cards were discarded.  
            
             
               
                |   | 
                 ª 
                  - 
                  © J 8 
                  ¨ - 
                  § Q 2 | 
               
                 ª 
                  - 
                © Q 9 
                ¨ - 
                § K J | 
                  | 
                ª 
                  - 
                © 2 
                ¨ 10 9 
                § 4 | 
              
               
                |   | 
                 ª 
                  - 
                  © - 
                  ¨ 8 4 
                  § A 10 | 
               
             
            In dummy, Lellouche had to decide if West had entered the bidding 
              at unfavourable vulnerability with: 
            ª Q x x 
              © K Q x x x 
              ¨ - 
              § K x x x x 
            or with 
            ª Q x x 
              © K Q x x x 
              ¨ - 
              § J x x x x 
            In the former case it would be correct to continue with §Q, 
              forcing East to cover and transferring the stopper to West. He could 
              then be put on lead with the club Jack and be forced to give declarer 
              his tenth trick in hearts. Declarer, however, correctly played a 
              club to the ace and another club (although it did not matter in 
              the actual case). The endplay was affected, and the game scored. 
             
            Although the contract and the lead was the same at the other table, 
              Israel won 12 IMPs on the board. The Polish declarer chose to play 
              a trump to the eight in hand at trick two. West could win with the 
              nine and continue with his low trump to partner's king and declarer's 
              ace. From here declarer could not find a winning line. 
             
            Grecian Earns Contract 
            
             
              
| 
Board 10. Dealer East. North/South Vul.
 | 
 
|   | 
ª Q 10 9 8 2 
© K J 4 
¨ K J 2 
§ J 8 | 
 
ª A J 
© Q 7 6 5 3 
¨ 9 7  
§ A 6 5 4 | 
                  | 
ª 7 5 4 
© A 9 2 
¨ A Q 5 3 
§ K Q 2 | 
|   | 
ª K 6 3 
© 10 8 
¨ 10 8 6 4 
§ 10 9 7 3 | 
 
 
            
             
               
                | West | 
                North | 
                East | 
                South | 
               
               
                | M Dialynas | 
                   | 
                A Dialynas | 
                  | 
               
               
                |    | 
                   | 
                1NT | 
                Pass | 
               
               
                | 2¨ | 
                Pass | 
                2© | 
                Pass | 
               
               
                | 3NT | 
                Pass | 
                4© | 
                All Pass | 
               
             
            On Board 10 of Round 22, Alexis Dialynas for Greece chose 4© rather 
              than 3NT for the final contract, due to the spade weakness.  
            The lead of §10 
              went to the king, and ace and another heart to the queen lost to 
              the king. North cashed ©J 
              and played ¨2. Alexis 
              carefully ducked this to South. The timing was now just right for 
              a squeeze. The Polish South exited with a spade to dummy's ace. 
              Alexis cashed two trumps, discarding spades. South was forced to 
              resign, squeezed in the minors, declarer taking the delayed diamond 
              finesse and winning ¨5 
              in the ending. 
             
            That Hand Again - Denmark 
              v Hungary in Round 10 
            By Peter Gill 
            
             
              
| 
Board 9. Dealer North. East/West Vul.
 | 
 
|   | 
ª 10 6 
© 10 4 
¨ Q 10 9 7 4 
§ Q 8 6 5 | 
 
ª Q 3 2 
© Q J 9 
¨ A 8 6 
§ K 9 7 4 | 
                  | 
ª A K J 9 8 5  
© 7 6  
¨ J 5 2 
§ A 10 | 
|   | 
ª 7 4 
© A K 8 5 3 2  
¨ K 3 
§ J 3 2 | 
 
 
            Correcting the previous episode about this hand on page 15 of Bulletin 
              9, Gai Hegedus didn't discard ¨K until Boje Henriksen played the 
              fourth round of clubs, so Boje (East) in 4ª was unable to play for 
              ¨Q onside. The discard of ¨K on the fourth club was a rather brilliant 
              play, superior to that previous credited to Hegedus, and declarer's 
              play also was better than that previous shown.  
            The sequence of play in 4ª 
              was: ©A, ©K, 
              a third heart ruffed and over-ruffed, ªA 
              and §A were cashed, 
              §10 to the king 
              followed by a club ruff and ªQ. 
              The defenders, Marjai and Hegedus, had both given false count in 
              clubs, so declarer Henriksen thought that South probably had §Q. 
              He thus cashed ¨A 
              to remove South's marked (by counting) singleton, and played the 
              last club. It was on this trick that Gai Hegedus discarded ¨K, 
              removing declarer's second chance of making the contract. Declarer 
              was left rueing the fact that there was no spade entry to dummy, 
              and had to go down. 
             |