Nice Bids & Plays
On Vugraph on Thursday afternoon, in the France v. Netherlands
match, a few interesting situations occurred, both in bidding and
play.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª J 10 9
© Q 10 8 6
¨ K 8 7 5
§ Q 6 |
ª K Q 3
© K 2
¨ Q 10 6 4 3
§ 10 8 5 |
|
ª A 7
© J 7 3
¨ 9 2
§ A K 9 7 4 2 |
|
ª 8 6 5 4 2
© A 9 5 4
¨ A J
§ J 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
1NT |
2© |
3§ |
All Pass |
With the friendly breaks in both clubs and the red suits, nine
tricks at NT are very easy. Scoring +130 only thus looked a bad
score for The Netherlands, but
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
|
|
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
WESTRA Berry, Netherlands
|
|
Here, Westra could open 2§
showing a weak hand with both majors. As a consequence, Van
Eijck led a heart against 3NT, presenting declarer with what
should have been his 9th trick. However, after winning the
©K at trick
two, Duguet led the §10
from dummy and Van Eijck covered with the queen. Later, declarer
crossed in spades to finesse the clubs again
two down
and 8 IMPs to the Netherlands where they should have lost
11.
Two boards later, Bitran found a very nice defensive play:
|
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q J 8 6 2
© A 9 6 4
¨ K
§ A 5 4 |
ª 9 7 3
© Q J 10 5 2
¨ 10 5 3
§ 10 9 |
|
ª A 10
© 8
¨ A J 7 4 2
§ K Q 8 3 2 |
|
ª K 5 4
© K 7 3
¨ Q 9 8 6
§ J 7 6 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
Well judged by Bitran to let 3¨ in peace. He might have done even
better by axing it, but that's really asking too much. The defence
was worth retaining it for posterity. Spade lead to the ace, heart
to the jack and ace, ¨K ducked and a spade to the king. Now trumps
had to be continued, and the only correct card to play now is the
¨Q. After some though, this card made her appearance on the table/the
video screen. Very nice, as declarer could not ruff a club any more
without completely losing control. Down three, vulnerable for a
beautiful 300 to France.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Westra took the more straightforward view of bidding the full support
value of his hand. The contract duly made, but France had recouped
4 IMPs.
On the final board of this short report, a difference in bidding
approach led to another good result for the French.
Board 11. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
ª Q 9 8
© K 5 2
¨ K J 10 4
§ 6 5 2 |
ª 6 4
© A 10 9 8
¨ A Q 9 5 2
§ J 8 |
|
ª J 3
© Q 7 6 4
¨ 7
§ K Q 9 7 4 3 |
|
ª A K 10 7 5 2
© J 3
¨ 8 6 3
§ A 10 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
|
|
1ª |
Dble |
2ª |
3§ |
3¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
When West bid 3¨,
Voldoire had every reason to believe that his hand had improved
considerably. In a sense he was right, but we wonder what
would have happened had Verhees doubled the final contract.
Would that suggest a diamond lead for two ruffs and one down?
On a passive trump lead, ten tricks were quickly there for
+420 to France.
|
|
VOLDOIRE Jean-Michel, France
|
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
|
|
1ª |
Dble |
2© |
3© |
3ª |
Pass |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Here, 2© was a transfer to show a good raise to 2ª, and Duguet
preferred to show his heart support ahead of his clubs. With the
fit established West had no reason to give any further information,
so North had no idea about the value of his diamonds and left 4©
alone. The contract went one down of course, but by losing only
50 here France had scored another 9 IMPs.
|