The session produced a number of interesting
boards. We will show you the proceedings at some tables and draw
attention to a few of the might have beens that did or did not occur
at others.
Board 1 was a matter of preempting style. What would you open as
dealer, none vulnerable, on a weakish 5-7 in the minors?
Board 1. Dealer North. None
Vul.
|
|
ª -
© 5
¨ Q J 8 6 3
§ Q 10 8 7 4 3 2 |
ª A J 6
© A J 6
¨ A 10 5 2
§ A J 6 |
|
ª Q 10 9 8 4 3
© K Q 10 2
¨ 7 4
§ 5 |
|
ª K 7 5 2
© 9 8 7 4 3
¨ K 9
§ K 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
4NT |
5ª |
All Pass |
Bas Drijver
|
|
On the first
board of the session, this is what happened at the table of
the overnight leaders. Bas Drijver, in first position, elected
to pass. Next came a Polish 2¨,
showing both majors and a weakish hand. West was strong enough
to take some forcing action, but now Drijver came to life with
a highly unusual NT. The other players and the kibitzers were
all taken by surprise, but this did not prevent East from showing
his extra values. Luckily for him, there it rested. As the ªK
does not come down in time, there is no way to avoid a trump
and a diamond loser.
At another table, North, a young Bulgarian, opened no less than
4§. When this
came round to West, he doubled and East bid 4ª.
West left this in peace, but North made a second attempt to
show his hand by announcing 4NT. East was quick to double, and
West then doubled as well when South took shelter in 5§.
As the defence led trumps after winning the ¨A,
there were just four tricks for them: a heart, a club and two
diamonds as declarer was not clairvoyant as to take an immediate
diamond finesse of the ten. Still, losing only 300 was a very
good score to N/S. |
At yet another table, we saw a very surprising
auction. Here, East overcalled North's 3§
with 3ª and West
was happy to just raise to 4ª
without giving it a moment's thought. E/W look like having quite
some experience in how to overcall against preempts...
On the next board, the matchpoints would go
to the best guessers. Compare these two auctions:
Board 2. Dealer East. North-South
Vul.
|
|
ª K 7 6
© A
¨ 10 9 7 6 2
§ A J 8 4 |
ª A 8 4 2
© K J 9
¨ Q J 3
§ Q 7 5 |
|
ª 10 9 5 3
© 10 8 7 6 5 4 3
¨ -
§ K 9 |
|
ª Q J
© Q 2
¨ A K 8 5 4
§ 10 6 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
Double |
Redouble |
1© |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
3§ |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
4© |
5¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
5© |
Double |
All Pass |
|
|
|
On a correct guess in trumps, East lost the
obvious four tricks for 300 to N/S.
Against the overnight leaders, the bidding
was from another planet or so:
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
2¨* |
Pass |
2ª |
Double |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
3ª |
Double |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Once again, we saw the Polish 2¨
in operation, East showing both majors and a weakish hand.
Drijver did well to pass partner's 3¨,
but then passed again when De Wijs doubled 3ª
to show extra values. Please note the 3ª
bid itself: what if West would hold only three spades?
If you look at this last auction and
compare it with the auction before, would it occur to you
that they really were produced on the same board?
As the cards lie, 3ª
can be made when declarer guesses to play a low heart to drop
the stiff ace, instead of (as he did at the table) leading
the ©K playing
for the queen to be singleton. The loss of a trick and a tempo
thus meant that two down was the result at the leaders' table
as well, giving them another good score after Monday's two
very good sessions.
|
|
Simon
de
Wijs |
Board 3. Dealer South. East-West
Vul.
|
|
ª K 10 9
© K J 2
¨ A 6 5
§ A K Q 6 |
ª 5 2
© 9 7 6 3
¨ K 8 3 2
§ 5 4 2 |
|
ª Q 8 6
© A Q 10 8
¨ Q 10
§ 9 8 7 3 |
|
ª A J 7 4 3
© 5 4
¨ J 9 7 4
§ J 10 |
With the help of a good guess in trumps you
might make 11 tricks in spades, but ten tricks in no-trumps look
pretty solid as well for the matchpoint tigers - mind you, the ones
who will seldom misguess the location of an important card such
as the ªQ on this board. This way, the tigers will once again beat
the ones who are in the straightforward contract for the routine
number of tricks...
An interesting hand was board 5. It's game
on for North-South, but careful defence can beat it:
Board 5. Dealer North. North-South
Vul.
|
|
ª K J 10 5
© Q J 10 9
¨ Q 2
§ K J 8 |
ª Q 8 3 2
© 8 5
¨ 7 6 4
§ A 7 6 5 |
|
ª A 9 4
© A K 7 4 2
¨ J
§ Q 9 3 2 |
|
ª 7 6
© 6 3
¨ A K 10 9 8 5 3
§ 10 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Drijver |
|
De Wijs |
|
1§ |
1© |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
This is how the overnight leaders reached
game on a combined 20 count. East made the very good lead of the
©A to have a look at the dummy. Now the only thing left to do is
to return the right black suit: a low club. West will win and continue
the suit to establish six tricks for the defenders before declarer
has got the chance to get to his required number of nine. No matter
what declarer does, finessing the clubs or not, he will not make
more than eight tricks.
At the table, East made the second best choice
of a low spade, after which the contract was made easily, and with
an overtrick in the end when East, in with the ©K, did cash his
ªA but again did not switch to a club.
Board 7. Dealer South. All
Vul.
|
|
ª
K Q 6 3
© A 10 8 2
¨ -
§ Q J 6 4 3 |
ª
A 9 4 2
© 9 3
¨ J 9 8 6 3
§ 10 8 |
|
ª
10
© K Q J 5
¨ K Q 4 2
§ A K 9 7 |
|
ª
J 8 7 5
© 7 6 4
¨ A 10 7 5
§ 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨*
(!) |
1NT (!) |
Pass |
Pass |
2¨*
(!!) |
Pass |
2ª |
3¨ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Double |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Here we have the introduction of a theoretical
innovation: the rebiddable void. Well, if you are playing Precision,
you may elect to open 1¨ and not 2§ with a five-card suit and both
majors. No doubt, you are hoping partner will show a major after
1¨.
After North's 1¨, East also had a problem.
He could not double with a singleton spade, so he had to improvise
something. 1NT was maybe an underbid, but it worked well against
the youthful opponents. Instead of realising he had only 12 hcp.
And a passing partner, North reopened with 2¨ (!) which by agreement
- yes, it was alerted! - showed 4-4 in the majors. South showed
his spades alright, but the message was not lost on West either,
who finally felt free to introduce his diamonds. This struck gold
with East who forced with 3ª and corrected the expected 3NT into
5¨. South understandably doubled this, but the hand almost plays
itself as sort of a crossruff, the defenders coming to their two
red aces only.
The next board to be shown actually was the
first board in play at the overnight leaders' table. They immediately
showed how well their quiet approach can work out.
Board 9. Dealer North. East-West
Vul.
|
|
ª 10 3
© K J 10 3
¨ Q J 6
§ J 8 4 3 |
ª J 9 8 2
© A 5 4
¨ K 9 4
§ 9 6 5 |
|
ª A Q 7 4
© 8 7 2
¨ A 10 7 3
§ Q 7 |
|
ª K 6 5
© Q 9 6
¨ 8 5 2
§ A K 10 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Double |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Two diamonds, a heart and a spade was all
declarer lost. NS +110 and an 80% start to the day.
If South doubles 1¨ immediately the timing
gets wrong. West will make some noise, and after that NS will never
be able again to properly assess their combined values.
Board 10. Dealer East. All
Vul.
|
|
ª K 7 5 3
© A J 7 6 5 3
¨ Q 10 7
§ - |
ª 6 4
© 9 4 2
¨ K 5 4
§ A K Q J 8 |
|
ª A 9 8 2
© Q 10
¨ 6 2
§ 10 9 5 4 3 |
|
ª Q J 10
© K 8
¨ A J 9 8 3
§ 7 6 2 |
This hand is a play problem in hearts. On
a club lead, if you take both losing red-suit finesses, you will
end up with nine tricks. If you believe the ©10 East plays in the
first round of the suit and thus go for the drop, you not only gain
a trick, but also a vital tempo to draw trumps and establish some
spade tricks.
Board 12. Dealer West. North-South
Vul.
|
|
ª Q J 8 3 2
© Q
¨ K 10 6
§ 9 5 4 2 |
ª K 4
© K 8 6 3
¨ A 8 3 2
§ A J 10 |
|
ª A 7 5
© J 10 4 2
¨ Q 9 4
§ K 7 6 |
|
ª 10 9 6
© A 9 7 5
¨ J 7 5
§ Q 8 3 |
On this hand, one declarer made 10 tricks
at no-trumps. He should remain anonymous, has his side probably
did not reach the best contract, which is 4©. The line of play in
3NT: well, you be the judge.
A spade was led by North, declarer winning
the second round. A diamond to the queen came next, North rising
with his ¨K and clearing the spades. Next, declarer finessed the
§Q through South (!), winning the §J in hand, and cashed the diamonds.
When the suit broke 3-3, the only thing left to do was to establish
one heart trick without North getting the lead. Thus, a low heart
went to the king. When the queen appeared, declarer suddenly had
time to establish his overtrick as well for a very good score! Congratulations.
An interesting defensive problem, solved by
few players, is the last board to be described in this report.
Board 23. Dealer South.
All Vul.
|
|
ª 10 9 5 3
© A K Q 8
¨ K 8
§ 10 8 7 |
ª K 7 4
© 9 7 5 4
¨ A Q 3
§ K 6 3 |
|
ª Q J 6
© 10 6 2
¨ 10 9 7 6 4
§ A 4 |
|
ª A 8 2
© J 3
¨ J 5 2
§ Q J 9 5 2 |
The normal contract is 1NT by South. West
leads a heart to declarer's jack and next comes a club. Best defence
is to duck this all round; East will win the second round of clubs
and continue the ¨10. Now, if West ducks this or wins it to continue
the suit, the hand is over due to the diamond blockage. Nine tricks.
But what if spades are attacked after the
defence take their first club? Eight tricks are the maximum, and
if declarer does not play double dummy he might make no more than
seven!
You could easily find out from the frequency
sheet of this board how good or bad your defensive play was. Scoring
-90, -120 or -150 made quite a difference this time.
|