48th European Bridge Team Championships Page 3 Bulletin 9 - Monday 21 August 2006


Open Teams - Netherlands v Poland (Round 20)

by Jos Jacobs

On Sunday morning, the local audience were once again given the chance to watch their favourites as the host country’s Open Team was scheduled to play on VuGraph against the Netherlands. Poland had made a very bad start but had gradually improved their position as the first week went on. On the other hand, The Netherlands had made an even worse start but had wiped off their first-day deficits from the third round onwards to be among the contenders for a Shanghai berth right from the start of the third day. When this match started, Poland thus needed a big win whereas the Netherlands could not afford a big defeat. The boards also helped the players this time in presenting us with an interesting match.

After a good slam on board 1, missed by both pairs, and a routine game on board 2 this was the third course of the morning buffet:

Board: 3. Dealer: South. E/W vul.
 ♠ 10 7 4
K 4
9 8 6 4 3
♣ A K J

♠ 9 5
A Q 10 2
K 10 7 5
♣ Q 10 4
Bridge deal
♠ A Q J 2
8 6 5 3
A 2
♣ 9 7 2
 ♠ K 8 6 3
J 9 7
Q J
♣ 8 6 5 3

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
   Pass
PassPass1♣Pass
1All Pass   

Bridge is such an easy game…why go on when partner has a passed hand and there is no need to be afraid of the spades? On a diamond overruff the contract was just made for the rarity of +80 to Poland.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
   Pass
1Pass1Pass
2Pass2♠Pass
3Pass4All Pass

What looked such a nice hand to Bertens in reply to Bakkeren’s opening bid turned out to be a club duplication nightmare. Even 3 would have been well beyond the safety limits so the breach of discipline did not matter very much. Poland +300 on the same diamond overruff for a gain of 9 IMPs out of nowhere.

The Dutch were compensated a little for this loss when on board 7 they managed a passout whereas the Polish Club by Chmurski and Gawrys led to a 2NT contract off six tricks; 3 IMPs to Netherlands to trail by 7-14 when a sequence of interesting boards came up:

Board: 9. Dealer: North. E/W vul.
 ♠ Q 9 8 7 6 2
10
K Q 9
♣ Q 7 4

♠ A
K J 6 3
A 8 7 6 5
♣ 8 5 2
Bridge deal
♠ K J 4
Q 9 7
10 4 2
♣ A J 10 3
 ♠ 10 5 3
A 8 5 4 2
J 3
♣ K 9 6

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
 2Pass3
Pass3♠PassPass
DblePass3NTAll Pass

2 was Multi and 3 play or correct, but the Poles had no problem whatsoever. When the 10 came down quickly the contract was never in danger. Poland +630.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
 2Pass2NT
Pass3Pass4♠
All Pass    

After Gawrys’ 2NT relay it was much more difficult for the Dutch to enter the auction so they were more or less forced t sell out to 4♠ undoubled. Gawrys went down two in peace for a loss of 100 and a gain of 11 IMPs. Poland +18. The IMPs came back to the Netherlands on the next board when they showed a better assessment of their combined hand values:

Board: 10. Dealer: East. All vul.
 ♠ 2
9 4 2
A 6 4 2
♣ A K 10 8 4

♠ K Q 9 7 6 5
J 7
9 5
♣ J 9 6
Bridge deal
♠ A 8 4
K Q 10 5 3
10
♣ Q 7 5 3
 ♠ J 10 3
A 8 6
K Q J 8 7 3
♣ 2

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
  12
2♠4♠Pass5♣
Pass5All Pass  

Well, on a spade lead you would make a slam, but after the logical heart lead De Wijs had to be content with 11 tricks. Please note the sophisticated bidding agreement by NS. Netherlands +600.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
  12
2♠3♠Pass4
All Pass    

Less sophisticated bidding here from NS, and far less enterprise too. When Bakkeren did not bother to lead his partner’s suit 12 tricks were made but Poland had lost a vulnerable game swing: 10 IMPs back to the Netherlands.

The next board was an interesting push in our featured match. In some of the other matches, however, all sorts of things happened:

Board: 11. Dealer: South. None vul.
 ♠ J 5
Q 10 6 5
10 5 4 3
♣ Q 9 3

♠ Q 10 6 2
A K 3
A Q J
♣ A 4 2
Bridge deal
♠ 4
9 8 7 2
K 9 8 7 6
♣ J 8 6
 ♠ A K 9 8 7 3
J 4
2
♣ K 10 7 5

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
   1♠
1NTPassPass2♠
PassPass2NTPass
3NTDbleAll Pass  

Simon de Wijs’ double made the defence easy for Bauke Muller. He won the lead of the ♠J with his king and switched to a low club. De Wijs won the queen and continued the suit to end declarer’s chances. As North was eventually squeezed in the red suits the contract was only one down, +100 to Netherlands.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
   1♠
DblePass22♠
DblePass3Pass
3NTAll Pass   

Chmurski too led the ♠J but Gawrys ducked this to declarer’s queen. When Bakkeren saw the 4-1 break in diamonds he simply cashed out for down two. Poland +100. No swing. Kiema was playing 3NT for Finland in their match with France after the following auction:

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KiemaChemlaElsinenCronier
   1♠
DblePass22♠
2NTPass3Pass
3NTAll Pass   

 

Chemla led the ♠J which ran to declarer’s queen. After two top diamonds and the bad news Kiema led a low club (!) on which Chemla hopped up with the queen to lead another spade to Cronier’s king. Cronier exited with a heart, declarer taking the AK and also the J. As Cronier had discarded two spades Kiema now could get off play with a spade, forcing Cronier to lead into the club tenace to hand declarer his contract. Finland +400.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
DeSainte MarieKoistinenBompisNyberg
   1♠
DblePass22♠
2NTPass3NTAll Pass

Nyberg too ducked the ♠J lead to declarer’s queen butDe Sainte Marie next played A and another. South, on lead with the J, cashed a top spade and now switched to a low club. When North won the queen and continued clubs, declarer had to go two off. Finland another +100 and one more step towards their 20-10 VP win. Some interesting variations turned up in the Iceland v. Germany match.

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
FritscheBaldurssonMarsalJonsson
   1♠
DblePass22♠
2NTPass3NTAll Pass

Jonsson ducked the ♠J lead to Fritsche’s queen and declarer continued K, Q and a low heart. On play with the J Jonsson next cashed his ♠AK before exiting in clubs. Once declarer ducked this, the count was rectified for a red-suit squeeze on North at this able too. Germany +100.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
MagnussonPiekarekThorvaldssonGotard
   1♠
DblePass1NT2♠
PassPass3Pass
3NTAll Pass   

1NT was a negative response to the take-out double. As a consequence, East had become the declarer in 3NT and South led a low spade on which declarer did well to put up the queen. Three top diamonds followed and then Thorvaldsson exited with a low club, North’s nine winning. North next cashed his ♠J, which South could not overtake, and continued the ♣Q and another. All declarer could do now was to cash his AK, give North his two heart tricks and get the K in the end to go down one. Did you see that South did not make a single defensive trick? Germany +50 and 10 IMPs to restrict their defeat in the match to 12-18 only. Back to Netherlands-Poland now after this lengthy excursion.

Board: 13. Dealer: North. All vul.
 ♠ K Q J 6 5
A Q J 5 4
8 7 5
♣ -

♠ A 8 7 3
K 10 2
K 3
♣ 9 8 6 2
Bridge deal
♠ 9 2
9 7 6
A Q 10 9 4
♣ K 7 4
 ♠ 10 4
8 3
J 6 2
♣ A Q J 10 5 3

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
 1Pass3♣
All Pass    

A weakness of Tarzan Precision caused the Dutch’ bad result here. They have to open 1 with a 5-5 in the majors. The contract went down two.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
 1♠Pass1NT
Pass2Pass2♠
Pass3Pass3♠
All Pass    

When Bertens made the unlucky lead of the ♣7 declarer finessed to get rid of two losing diamonds. After that, he could ruff out the hearts, overtake the ♠10 with the king and play on trumps, just losing two trumps and a diamond to make an overtrick. Poland +170 and 9 IMPs to lead by 11 again. On board 15, the Dutch found a good save missed by the Polish:

Board: 15. Dealer: South. N/S vul.
 ♠ J 8 4 2
J 10
Q J 10 6
♣ K 7 2

♠ A 3
9 8 6 5
K 8 7 4
♣ J 6 3
Bridge deal
♠ 10 7 6
A K 7 4 3 2
9 5 3
♣ 5
 ♠ K Q 9 5
Q
A 2
♣ A Q 10 9 8 4

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
   1♣
Pass123♣
4DblePass4♠
All Pass    

With spades established at the four-level due to systemic reasons, the Polish saw no reason to save any further and thus conceded -620.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
   1♣
Pass1♠34
5DblePassPass
5DbleAll Pass  

Bertens’ jump to 3 made it easy for Bakkeren to show both an outside trick and a willingness to save. Down two, Poland only +300 and 8 IMPs to the Netherlands. The score stood at 36-31 to Poland now.

On the next board, the Polish missed a game but the Dutch misjudged:

Board: 16. Dealer: West. E/W vul.
 ♠ Q 9 6 3
A Q 8
3
♣ Q 10 8 4 2

♠ J
9 7 4
Q 10 9 8 7 4 2
♣ 7 6
Bridge deal
♠ K 10 5 2
K 3
A K J 6
♣ A 5 3
 ♠ A 8 7 4
J 10 6 5 2
5
♣ K J 9

Open Room

WestNorthEastSouth
KowalskiDe WijsTuszynskiMuller
PassPass1♣1♠
Pass2♣Pass2
PassPassDblePass
3All Pass   

1♠ showed either 5 hearts or 4 spades and 5+ diamonds. Though Kowalski responded to Tuszynski’s double I what was the doubler’s best suit, Tuszynski still called it a day. Poland +150.

Closed Room

WestNorthEastSouth
BakkerenChmurskiBertensGawrys
PassPass11
445Dble
All Pass    

Bertens’ natural 1 opening made it easy for the Dutch too to miss game: 3NT only goes down on an unlikely club lead from South. Chmurski bid what he thought he could make, and so did Bertens. When Chmurski accurately (but rather obviously too) switched to a club after winning the A the contract had to go one down for +100 more or 6 IMPs to Poland. In the closing stages, the Netherlands got back some IMPs to lose the match 38-45 wich gave Poland a victory by 16-14 VP. Neither team’s cause had been done any real good by this result.



Page 3

  Return to top of page
<<Previous Next>>
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6
To the Bulletins List