Herkules vs Plovdiv,
1st session
by Jos Jacobs
After the Roud Robins, it would be De Lombard v. Parioli
and Herkules v. Plovdiv. For reasons that will become clear
once you know about the outcome, the first segment of the
Lombard-Parioli match is shown elsewhere in this issue in
Italian only. Below, you will find a reort about that same
1st segment of the other semifinal. If you look at the boards,
it’s difficult to imagine how the score in the other
match could stand at 67-9 after only 12 boards. Most probably,
God still is Italian...
On the very first board, the Bulgarians were punished severely
for what might have been a slight inadequacy in their bidding
methods.
Board 1 - N/-
|
|
ª J 9 7 5 2
© A 7
¨ -
§ A K Q 5 4 3 |
ª K 6
© Q 10 8
¨ Q 9 8 7 5 4 2
§ 10 |
|
ª 4 3
© 9 6 5 2
¨ J 6 3
§ J 8 7 6 |
|
ª A Q 10 8
© K J 4 3
¨ A K 10
§ 9 2 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Iporski |
Bertheau |
Kovatchev |
Nystrom |
|
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
South only made relay bids, on which North showed 8-10 high-card
points (A=3, K=2 and Q=1) by bidding 3¨ and 5-3-0-5 or longer
on the suits by bidding 4ª. After this, the shot at the final
contract was made in full confidence and so it proved. An
easy enough +980 with no chance of a grand as the spade finesse
was wrong.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sylvan |
Karaivanov |
Sundelin |
Trendafilov |
|
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
6NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Surprisingly enough, North showed six clubs and five spades
on this sequence and still South went for 6NT. Had he not
realised that he would be the declarer in 6ª as well? We will
never know, but the 4-1 break in clubs meant that 6 NT was
too difficult in practice.
Double-dummy, there is a simple (?) line. The diamond lead
goes to Jack and Ace. You cross to dummy’s §A, noting
the fall of the §10, and then the ªA and another endplays
West.
Anyway, 11 IMP’s to Herkules.
Two boards later, Herkules missed a great chance:
Board 3 - S/EW
|
|
ª K J 10 8 4
© Q
¨ 9 8 7 4
§ K Q 5 |
ª 7
© A K 10 8
¨ A 5
§ J 10 9 8 3 2 |
|
ª A Q 9 3 2
© 9 5 3 2
¨ Q J 3
§ 7 |
|
ª 6 5
© J 7 6 4
¨ K 10 6 2
§ A 6 4 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Iporski |
Bertheau |
Kovatchev |
Nystrom |
|
|
|
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
On a diamond lead, declarer could not lose more thans three
clubs and a heart. Plovdiv +110.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sylvan |
Karaivanov |
Sundelin |
Trendafilov |
|
|
|
Pass |
2§ |
2ª |
All Pass |
|
Here too, someone bid 2ª after the same 2§ opening, but the
timing was not quite proper. Holding three quick tricks, Sylván
mighyt have ventured a balancing double, but when he elected
to pass, the Swedes had to be content with down three undoubled
for +150 only, and just 1 more IMP.
Both teams had a chance to scoire a considerable gain on
a real guessing board:
Board 8 - W/-
|
|
ª A 10 4
© 9 8 7
¨ 10 9 8 7 5
§ 7 6 |
ª K 9 6 5 2
© K 10
¨ A 2
§ Q 8 3 2 |
|
ª J 8 3
© A Q 6 2
¨ J 4
§ A 10 5 4 |
|
ª Q 7
© J 5 4 3
¨ K Q 6 3
§ K J 9 |
Four Spades would be the normal contract, but you have to
guess very well without any clues to make it. Diamond lead
(we will never know why North at one table led the ¨5 from
his sequence) to the ace, three rounds of hearts shedding
the red loser and a spade to the king. So far so good, but
East wins and returns a diamond. You ruff and lead a spade
to dummy’s eight and South’s queen. Not good enough,
as the next diamond will fatally shorten you.
Try a spade to the nine instead. This works out well: it
loses to the ª10, but on the next round of spades, all higher
outstanding trumps appear. So you will not be shortened as
you can ruff the third round of diamonds with dummy’s
last trump, this not being the jack. After this, a club from
dummy will see you home past South’s §K. Unlikely, but
effective.
In our match, 2 IMP’s to Herkules when the Bulgarian
declarer went two down and his swedish counterpart only one.
Both teams missed another chance on board 10:
Board 10 - E/All
|
|
ª A 10 9 8
© 3
¨ J 6
§ A K 10 8 6 2 |
ª J 6 4 3
© A Q J
¨ A K Q 10
§ 7 5 |
|
ª Q 2
© K 9 7 6 5 4
¨ 9
§ Q J 4 3 |
|
ª K 7 5
© 10 8 2
¨ 8 7 5 4 3 2
§ 9 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Iporski |
Bertheau |
Kovatchev |
Nystrom |
|
|
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
3§ |
Pass |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
On this start of the auction, ending up in 3NT looks impossible.
It’s even very difficult to double 3§, though it will
probably go down only two...
On the other hand, 4© will be in jeopardy with four black
top losers.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sylvan |
Karaivanov |
Sundelin |
Trendafilov |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2§ |
Dble |
2© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Here, 1§ was either 11-13 or 17+ and 2§ confirmed the strong
NT-type. Still, the Swedes came nowhere near the proper final
contract either, inspite of the silence of their opponents...
It did not matter all that much, as after 12 boards Herkules
had a convincing enough 23-1 lead, which they nearly doubled
in the 2nd segment to almost make sure of their qualification
for the final at that early stage.
|