A Day in the Life
By Herman De Wael
As part of my functions of Scribe of the Appeals Committee, I calculate
the relative frequency of appeals during European Championships,
and express this as the "BAR" (Board Appeal Ratio). At
these championships, the BAR is currently at a relatively low value
of 0.26 appeals per 1000 boards. I will let you know the final figure
in tomorrow's bulletin.
In order to calculate the BAR, I need to count the total number
of boards played at the championships, and I do this meticulously
by checking the number of players in every session, especially here,
where the heat means that nearly every time, some pairs have dropped
out. That is what I call "checking the holes", and now
I know how many holes it takes to fill the Palais de l'Europe.
On Wednesday evening, I just had to laugh when the figure had
reached the high 90,000's, and I calculated that we would reach
the sixth digit sometime Thursday morning. After checking Thursday's
holes, I calculated that the 105th table to play the seventh board
of the first session would be the special one. Of course it is impossible
to find which one of 256 tables in 10 rooms in 3 buildings is the
105th to start play, so I decided to simply use the 105th table,
starting from A1, as the special one. That turned out to be K4.
So let me introduce to you: the 100,000th board of these Championships.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vulnerable.
|
|
ª A 7
© K 10 9
¨ Q 9 7 6 5 3 2
§ Q |
ª K J 2
© 6 5 4 2
¨ -
§ K 10 9 4 3 2 |
|
ª Q 10 6 3
© A Q J
¨ A K 10 8
§ J 7 |
|
ª 9 8 5 4
© 8 7 3
¨ J 4
§ A 8 6 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Salomone |
Bruhn |
Bertello |
Eriksen |
|
1¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Asger Bruhn opened hostilities with 1¨ and Renato Bertello was
unstoppable. Giovanni Salomone introduced both his suits and was
rather sad ("what do I bid when I am negative?") when
he put his dummy down. Christian Eriksen did pick his partner's
long suit by leading the ¨J, but Renato made the grade when he was
able to set up the clubs for 10 tricks.
Tiger Bridge
By Mark Horton
Some of you may be lucky enough to have a copy of Tiger Bridge
by Jeremy Flint & Freddie North. One of the chapters discusses
the idea of doubling when you know the opponents are limited and
you suspect the cards may be lying badly for them.
In the quarterfinal match between Reps and Chemla, Josef Piekerek
made a typical ‘tiger double’.
Board 25. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª 9 4 2
© A 8
¨ 8 6 3
§ K 10 9 8 3 |
ª Q J 7 5
© 7 4
¨ A K 10
§ J 7 6 4 |
|
ª K 6 3
© Q 10 9 5 2
¨ Q J 2
§ A Q |
|
ª A 10 8
© K J 6 3
¨ 9 7 5 4
§ 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cronier |
Gotard |
Chemla |
Piekerek |
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
South reckoned he had three tricks coming and the auction had suggested
the opponents were limited. He led a diamond and declarer won with
the queen and played a spade to the queen and a club to the queen.
South took the next spade with the ace and played a second diamond.
Declarer won in dummy, played a spade to his king, cashed the ace
of clubs, played a diamond to dummy, cashed the last spade and played
a heart. North went up with the ace and played his remaining heart.
Southcould win and play a diamond and declarer was one down.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Von Arnim |
Abecassis |
Auken |
Soulet |
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Dble |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
South dutifully led a club and declarer won with the queen. She
played a spade and South went in with the ace to play a second club.
Declarer won, played a spade to the queen and the four of hearts.
When North played low it was all over. South could win with jack
and return a spade but declarer won in hand, crossed to the ace
of diamonds and played the winning spade. North knew he was about
to be endplayed, so he threw the ace of hearts. That certainly avoided
the endplay, as the Tigress in the East seat now claimed nine tricks.
|