The Semifinals
Four teams still were in contention for a place in Wednesday’s
Finals when play resumed on Tuesday afternoon: Chemla (the pride
of France) would play Chagas (representing the Americas) and in
the other match Miroglio (Poland with distinct Italian flavour)
would face Kalish (Israel)
Let’s first turn our attention to the Miroglio-Kalish match,
in which Tuszynski-Kowalski would play Podgur-Kalish on Vugraph,
with Szymanowski-Romanski facing the Herbst brothers in the Closed
Room.
The Poles scored their first goal on the first board to take a
1-0 lead, but the second board brought a much higher turnover:
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 5 2
© 3 2
¨ A J 8 6 5 4
§ A Q 3 |
ª J 9 3
© Q 8 7
¨ Q 10 9 7 3
§ 9 5 |
|
ª K 10 7 6 4
© 10 9 5
¨ -
§ K 10 8 6 4 |
|
ª A Q 8
© A K J 6 4
¨ K 2
§ J 7 2 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kalish |
Tuszynski |
Podgur |
Kowalski |
|
|
2ª |
Dble |
3ª |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Piotr Tuszynski, who had to bid 4¨ under a certain pressure, gave
the auction some more thought when 4© came round to him, but when
he finally passed this the Poles were in a sound contract and registered
an easy enough +620. Kowalski won the spade lead, cashed the ªA
and ruffed a spade before playing two top hearts followed by the
¨K which was ruffed. No overtrick.
At the other table, the Israeli pair were given all the room they
wanted:
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Romanski |
I. Herbst |
Szymanowski |
O. Herbst |
|
|
2¨ |
Dble |
2ª |
3ª |
Pass |
6NT |
With the diamonds not behaving and the §K offside, Ophir had to
go down two. Miroglio +13 IMP’s to lead by 14 now.
Kalish scored a goal on the next board to trail 1-14, but a few
boards later it was bingo for them:
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª 9 8
© A Q 4
¨ A K 10 9
§ J 9 6 5 |
ª 2
© 10 9 5
¨ Q J 7 6 2
§ Q 8 3 2 |
|
ª 10 5 3
© J 7 6
¨ 8 4 3
§ A K 7 4 |
|
ª A K Q J 7 6 4
© K 8 3 2
¨ 5
§ 10 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kalish |
Tuszynski |
Podgur |
Kowalski |
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When Kalish led the ¨Q Apolinary Kowalski quickly had all the tricks.
Miroglio +1010. Could this be a loss for them?
Yes it could. In the Closed Room, they found the club lead but
had to pay dearly for it:
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Romanski |
I. Herbst |
Szymanowski |
O. Herbst |
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5ª |
Pass |
6ª |
Dble |
Redble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
This was worth +1620 or so, an unusual enough number, but Kalish
had got 12 IMP’s back to trail by just 1.
On the very next board, the Poles struck back:
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª Q 6
© A Q
¨ A Q 8 4 3
§ A 10 9 3 |
ª J 10 9
© 10 9 7 2
¨ J 10 9
§ 8 7 5 |
|
ª 8 4 2
© K J 8 6 5
¨ 7 2
§ K Q J |
|
ª A K 7 5 3
© 4 3
¨ K 6 5
§ 6 4 2 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kalish |
Tuszynski |
Podgur |
Kowalski |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
Straightforward Polish Club. 2¨ showed a strong hand with diamonds
and the rest was completely natural, Tuszynski’s bid of 3ª
showing top honour doubleton being the key to a thin slam. When
all the suits broke nicely, declarer did no longer need the heart
finesse as 12 tricks were already there. Miroglio +1370.
At the other table, they came nowhere near:
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Romanski |
I. Herbst |
Szymanowski |
O. Herbst |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
1© |
1ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When North chose 2NT as his rebid, NS were off the slam track.
Miroglio had scored 12 IMP’s and again taken a more substantial
lead.
A few boards later, Kalish again levelled the match:
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª A J 7 5 4 2
© A Q
¨ A 7 3
§ 8 2 |
ª 9 8
© 9 6 4 3
¨ K 10
§ K Q J 10 6 |
|
ª 10
© K 10 5 2
¨ J 9 8 5 2
§ A 9 7 |
|
ª K Q 6 3
© J 8 7
¨ Q 6 4
§ 5 4 3 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kalish |
Tuszynski |
Podgur |
Kowalski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
Against this very normal contract East led the ¨9. Dummy played
low, West had to play the ten and declarer ducked, possibly hoping
for a favourable continuation. Seeing the §K next was not quite
what he wanted…With the ©K offside, there was no redress.
Kalish +100.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Romanski |
I. Herbst |
Szymanowski |
O. Herbst |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
In the other room, East made a passive trump lead, and Ilan Herbst
quickly seized his chance by winning this and presenting the ©Q!
East won, but he still did not know that he had to attack clubs,
so he returned a heart. The ace won, perforce, a middle trump was
overtaken in dummy, a club went on the ©J and a club was led. When
the defence continued clubs, Herbst could ruff high, cross to dummy
by overtaking the ª2 with the ª3, eliminate the clubs and play the
¨A and a diamond to the queen. West won the king but had to give
a ruff and discard. Well done, +620 to Kalish and 12 IMP’s
back.
Kalish took the lead two boards later, when NS had to cope with
a gigantic misfit:
Board 12. Dealer West. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª A Q 7 5 2
© 9
¨ 9
§ K 9 8 4 3 2 |
ª 9 6 4
© A 4 2
¨ 10 8
§ J 10 7 6 5 |
|
ª K J 10 8 3
© K 10 7 3
¨ Q 5 3
§ Q |
|
ª -
© Q J 8 6 5
¨ A K J 7 6 4 2
§ A |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kalish |
Tuszynski |
Podgur |
Kowalski |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
4§ |
All Pass |
|
2ª showed a twosuiter, but Kowalski’s idea behind bidding
2NT certainly was not to hear his partner announce a strong 6-5
or so. When 4§ came back to him, he was stuck as anything he would
do next would be treated as forcing. Passing was not a great success
either, as the contract went down two, +200 to Kalish.
In the other semifinal, at one table North did not open so it was
East who opened 1ª. South now went in to show his beautiful red
hand by bidding 3§, which became the final contract as North could
not possibly find any red suit preference with his two singleton
nines.
At the other table in this match, the Herbsts were among those
who showed the way:
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Romanski |
I. Herbst |
Szymanowski |
O. Herbst |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Don’t care too much about partner’s twosuiter, just
bid what you hope to (and might well!) make. Kalish a practical
+600 and a lead of 13 IMP’s.
At half time, it stood at 41-27 to Kalish. The second half became
a tense affair. At board 20, the score stood level at 42-42, and
you might be able to read a report on what happened afterwards elsewhere
in this issue.
|