Trying for two
Two of Europe’s top women’s teams met in the fourth
set of the qualifying round-robin for the Women’s Teams –
the perennial contenders from the Netherlands led by Bep Vriend,
and a mostly Austrian team captained by Maria Erhart. The Dutch
came away with a 25-9 victory to lead their group after the first
full day of play.
The lineups: Vriend and Carla Arnolds versus Erhart and Terry Weigkricht
at one table, while Femke Hoogweg-Wietske Van Zwol of the Netherlands
opposed Jovi Smederevac of Austria and Chantal Hammerli of Switzerland
at the other.
On the first deal, both East-West pairs reached a spade slam, making
13 tricks when a side-suit finesses was successful. The Netherlands
scored first, a single IMP, when Hoogweg and Van Zwol competed to
3¨, making four,
while Vriend was allowed to play 2ª,
down two for minus 100.
Vriend picked up another 2 IMPs on Board 3, where 2NT was the
contract at both tables – by North-South at one and by East-West
at the other.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª A J 2
© A 10 9 8 3
¨ Q J
§ Q 10 7 |
ª 8 5
© Q 5
¨ 9 8 4
§ A K J 9 6 3 |
|
ª Q 10 9 7 6
© K J 6 2
¨ A 7 2
§ 2 |
|
ª K 4 3
© 7 4
¨ K 10 6 5 3
§ 8 5 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vriend |
Erhart |
Arnolds |
Weigkricht |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1© |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
2NT |
All Pass |
|
Arnolds led the ª6 to Erhart’s jack, and declarer followed
with the ¨Q, taken by Arnolds with the ace. Too late, she played
her singleton club to partner’s king. Vriend returned a spade,
but Erhart was in control. She won the ace, cashed the ¨J, then
played a spade to dummy’s king, followed by three more diamonds.
Then came a club, taken by Vriend with the ace. Erhart finished
with nine tricks: four diamonds, three spades, one club and the
©A.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Smederevac |
Hoogweg |
Hammerli |
Van Zwol |
|
|
|
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
All Pass |
The light opening didn’t work so well for East-West. Van
Zwol started with a low diamond to the jack, ducked by Hammerli.
Van Zwol continued with the ¨Q,
ducked again, but Van Zwol overtook with the king and knocked out
declarer’s ace with the ¨10.
A heart went to dummy’s queen and North’s ace, and she
played a low spade to Hammerli’s 9 and South’s king.
Two more diamonds followed, then a spade to the ace for two down
and plus 200 for Vriend.
Austria scored 4 IMPs to gain the lead when Erhart and Weigkricht
defeated 1NT by a trick for plus 50 while their teammate, Hammerli
was making it.
The Netherlands made another small gain on Board 6, but it might
have been much more.
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q 2
© K Q J 6 2
¨ 6 5
§ K 9 6 5 |
ª K 10 9 7 6
© 10 5 4
¨ A Q 9
§ 7 4 |
|
ª A 5 4 3
© 8 7 3
¨ 10
§ A J 10 8 2 |
|
ª J 8
© A 9
¨ K J 8 7 4 3 2
§ Q 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Smederevac |
Hoogweg |
Hammerli |
Van Zwol |
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2© |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Hoogweg led the ©K,
overtaken by Van Zwol to return the suit, and North-South took the
first three tricks. Smederevac won the club continuation with the
ace and played trumps. When they proved to be 2-2, she conceded
a club and claimed plus 140.
At the other table, the Dutch let a juicy penalty slip through
their fingers.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vriend |
Erhart |
Arnolds |
Weigkricht |
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2© |
4ª |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Had Vriend seen fit to apply the red card to this ugly contract,
the Netherlands would have scored plus 800. Perhaps Vriend feared
that the Austrians would run to hearts if she doubled. For whatever
reason, it was a lost opportunity. Vriend led a low spade to her
partner’s ace, and a spade was returned to her king. Vriend
played a club to partner’s ace and on the club return, Weigkricht
overtook the §Q
with the king to play a diamond. It was over quickly from there
as Weigkricht recorded minus 200. That was 2 IMPs to Vriend.
Erhart regained the lead on Board 7, which was interesting for
the differing views of the West hand at the two tables.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª -
© K J 10 7 2
¨ A K Q J 6
§ J 7 2 |
ª A J 10 7 6 4
© 6
¨ 4
§ Q 10 5 4 3 |
|
ª Q 9 8
© A Q 8 5 3
¨ 10 3
§ A K 8 |
|
ª K 5 3 2
© 9 4
¨ 9 8 7 5 2
§ 9 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Smederevac |
Hoogweg |
Hammerli |
Van Zwol |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
3§ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
Smederevac bid her 7-point hand as though it was 18 – and
she caught a very nice dummy when the Dutch sold out. North started
with diamonds, and Smederevac ruffed the second round, playing a
heart to the ace, followed by the ªQ
for plus 680.
The auction was vastly different at the other table.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vriend |
Erhart |
Arnolds |
Weigkricht |
3ª |
4© |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
4NT |
Dble |
5¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
The auction worked out about as well as it could for the Austrians.
Vriend and Arnolds got the maximum from the deal, but it was still
a loss. Vriend started with her singleton heart. Arnolds won the
©Q when Weigkricht
played low, and Vriend ruffed the heart return with her singleton
trump. The defenders still had two clubs to come for plus 500. That
was 5 IMPs to Austria.
The match was close at that point, but the Dutch scored 20 IMPs
over the final three boards to win handily.
The Dutch scored 7 IMPs on Board 8 when Hoogweg and Van Zwol made
3© for plus 140
at one table while Vriend made 3ª
at the other table when Erhard underled her ©A
at trick one, losing to Vriend’s singleton king.
Another 6 IMPs went to the Dutch on the next deal.
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª K 9
© J 9 8 5 4 3 2
¨ A 2
§ 5 3 |
ª A Q 10 3
© Q 6
¨ K 10 7 3
§ K Q 6 |
|
ª 7 5 2
© K 7
¨ J 6 5
§ J 9 7 4 2 |
|
ª J 8 6 4
© A 10
¨ Q 9 8 4
§ A 10 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Smederevac |
Hoogweg |
Hammerli |
Van Zwol |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
1NT |
2© |
All Pass |
|
Hoogweg had no difficulty making nine tricks, losing one trick
in each suit for plus 140.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vriend |
Erhart |
Arnolds |
Weigkricht |
|
3© |
Pass |
4© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
With a trick and a half outside the ragged suit, a first-seat 3©
bid with the North hand would not win many votes in a bidding contest,
even at favorable vulnerability, but it did put pressure on the
opponents. Weigkricht upped the ante with her preemptive raise.
Arnolds made an excellent decision to pass her partner’s double
of 4©. The level
of the bidding was well past any makeable contract for her side.
Erhart had the same four losers. Minus 100 for Erhart meant 6 IMPs
to Vriend.
The final deal was another gain for the Vriend team.
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª K J 10 4 3
© 8 3 2
¨ 7 4 3
§ J 3 |
ª 5
© Q J 10 9
¨ Q 8 6
§ A 9 8 7 6 |
|
ª A 9 8 6
© K 4
¨ A K 10 9 5
§ 5 2 |
|
ª Q 7 2
© A 7 6 5
¨ J 2
§ K Q 10 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Vriend |
Erhart |
Arnolds |
Weigkricht |
|
|
1¨ |
Dble |
1© |
1ª |
1NT |
All Pass |
Weigkricht led the ª2 to the 5, king and 6. Erhart continued with
the ªJ, and when Arnolds played the 9, Weigkricht overtook with
the queen and returned the suit. Suddenly, Arnolds had two spade
tricks. All she had to do from there was knock out the ©A to claim
10 tricks for plus 180.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Smederevac |
Hoogweg |
Hammerli |
Van Zwol |
|
|
1¨ |
Dble |
1© |
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
Smederevac could not make nine tricks in clubs. The defense started
with the ªJ to the
ace. Declarer played the ©K
next, taken by South with the ace. West ruffed the spade return
and played three more hearts. North ruffed the fourth round of hearts
with the §J and
exited with a diamond. Smederevac won the ¨A
and played a club to the king and ace. Another club went to South’s
10. Van Zwol cashed the §Q
and punched West’s last trump out with a spade. That was one
down and 7 IMPs to the Dutch.
There are still many matches to play, but Vriend, winner of the
Mixed Pairs with Anton Maas earlier in the tournament, was in contention
for a second championship.
|