| A Close Match 
              Or Two  In the round of 16, many matches were decided at half time already, 
              taking into account the IMP margins reached. Among them Soroldoni 
              v. Quantin, maybe the biggest shock of the round as the Italo-American 
              team with a distinct Sanmarinese flavour took a 60-IMP lead, and 
              also Lévy v. Chagas where the score stood at 52-0 or so (see 
              elsewhere in this issue). There were only two matches in which the 
              margins at half time was by one figure only: Lemaitre v. Bertheau 
              (23-28) and Canesi v. Bar (33-25). Statistically speaking, the toughest 
              second half battles should occur here, so off we went to watch them. After an easy game for a push on the first board, this was the 
              second: 
             
              
| Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul. |  
|  | ª 4 © K J 10 6 5 3
 ¨ A 7 5 4
 § 7 5
 |  ª K J 10 8 7 5 2 © A 7
 ¨ J 8
 § 8 6
 |  | ª A 9 3 © 8 2
 ¨ K 10 3
 § A Q J 9 2
 | 
|  | ª Q 6 © Q 9 4
 ¨ Q 9 6 2
 § K 10 4 3
 |  
             Normal bidding by all four players led to a normal result. Down 
              two, 300 to Bertheau. 
             
               
                | Open Room |   
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Nystrom | Counil | Bertheau | Naltet |   
                | 3ª | 4© | 4ª | 5© |   
                | Pass | Pass | Dble | All Pass |  Normal bidding by all four players led to a normal result. Down two, 300 to 
              Bertheau. 
             
              
                | Closed Room |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Dechelette | Magnusson | Lemaitre | Midskog |  
| Pass | 2© | 3§ | Pass |  
| 4ª | All Pass |  |  |  Here, the situation changed dramatically when Dechelette adopted 
              different tactics. The 2© opening bid had not quite expressed the 
              full attacking value of the hand and thus it was no surprise that 
              West’s 4ª at his second attempt silenced everyone as South 
              had not raised hearts earlier. On the lead of the ¨A and a diamond 
              declarer made 11 tricks, Lemaitre +650 and 8 IMP’s. Strange things happened on board 19: 
             
              
| Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |  
|  | ª Q 6 5 4 © A
 ¨ A Q J 9 8 4 3
 § 8
 |  ª 7 © Q J 8 6 2
 ¨ 5 2
 § Q J 10 5 2
 |  | ª K J 9 2 © K 9 7 5 3
 ¨ K 7
 § A K
 | 
|  | ª A 10 8 3 © 10 4
 ¨ 10 6
 § 9 7 6 4 3
 |  
             
              
| Open Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Nystrom | Counil | Bertheau | Naltet |  
                |  |  |  | Pass |  
| Pass | 1¨ | Dble | 1ª |  
| 2© | 4© | Dble | Pass |  
| Pass | 4ª | Dble | Pass |  
| 5© | All Pass |  |  |  Wouldn’t you back East and rather be a defender here? 
             
               
                | Closed Room |   
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Dechelette | Magnusson | Lemaitre | Midskog |   
                |  |  |  | Pass |   
                | Pass | 1¨ | Dble | Pass |   
                | 3© | 4¨ | 4 NT | 5¨ |   
                | Pass | Pass | 5© | All Pass |  Here, the spades got out of sight completely, but we are still 
              wondering if West’s Pass over 5¨ gave East any clue about 
              his number of aces… Needless to say, the board was a push. Two boards later, the automatic extra chance proved decisive: 
             
              
| Board 21. Dealer North. N/S Vul. |  
|  | ª 9 7 5 3 © Q 8 7 3
 ¨ K J 8
 § J 4
 |  ª J 2 © K 10 9 2
 ¨ 10 9 6 5 4
 § K 7
 |  | ª K Q 8 © J 5
 ¨ Q 3 2
 § Q 10 6 5 3
 | 
|  | ª A 10 6 4 © A 6 4
 ¨ A 7
 § A 9 8 2
 |  After an auction not worth mentioning both South’s were playing 
              1NT. Holding 150 Aces they no doubt opened 1NT as quickly as they 
              could. Both Wests led a low diamond, according to taste either the 
              four or the five. As the ¨Q will stay at her original place anyway 
              (unless you are playing against magicians) it does not cost to play 
              dummy’s eight first. This time it would cost you the contract 
              if you would forget this simple truth, as they did at one table…so 
              5 IMP’s to the good guys, whoever they are. The next board was a more serious affair, however: 
             
              
| Board 22. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |  
|  | ª K 9 6 © Q J 7
 ¨ A Q 9 7 2
 § 5 3
 |  ª 7 3 © 9 8 6 3
 ¨ 6
 § A K 10 9 8 6
 |  | ª A 2 © A K 4 2
 ¨ 10 8 5 4
 § Q J 4
 | 
|  | ª Q J 10 8 5 4 © 10 5
 ¨ K J 3
 § 7 2
 |  
             
              
| Open Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Nystrom | Counil | Bertheau | Naltet |  
                |  |  | 1NT | 2ª |  
| 3ª | 4ª | Pass | Pass |  
| Dble | All Pass |  |  |  Here, the 14-16 NT clarified the position for West beforehand, 
              so whatever action South would take, West would know he could go 
              on. For EW, 4© is easily on, so in theory, NS took a good save. 
              It might have been a very good save had the defence been less immaculate. 
              West led a diamond won by dummy’s ace. A low trump was called 
              for, but East was quite awake. She rose with the ace and first played 
              the §J on which partner contributed the 10. Next, she continued 
              the ¨10 for her partner to ruff. The ©9 came back now, so she knew 
              that two hearts and one more club were there for the taking. Very 
              well done, down three and 500 to Bertheau. Would it be enough? 
             
              
| Closed Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Dechelette | Magnusson | Lemaitre | Midskog |  
                |  |  | 1¨ | 2 ª |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  As the range of the 1¨ opening is less defined than the NT-range 
              at the other table, West was in some trouble after the weak jump. 
              This time, his waiting tactics did not work, as he is still waiting…To 
              make things worse, they did not find the perfect defence (see Open 
              Room) needed to BEAT 2ª. So the contract made, in fact even with 
              an overtrick, and Bertheau had gained an unexpected 12 IMP’s 
              to go clearly into the lead. 
             
              
| Board 27. Dealer South None Vul. |  
|  | ª 6 4 © J 6 4
 ¨ A 8 2
 § A K J 5 4
 |  ª 3 © A 9 5
 ¨ Q J 7 6 5 3
 § 8 6 3
 |  | ª A K Q J 10 9 8 5 © 10 7
 ¨ 10 9 4
 § -
 | 
|  | ª 7 2 © K Q 8 3 2
 ¨ K
 § Q 10 9 7 2
 |  
             
               
                | Open Room: |   
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Nystrom | Counil | Bertheau | Naltet |   
                |  |  |  | Pass |   
                | 2¨ | Pass | 4ª | All Pass |  It certainly was an advantage here to be able to open a weak two 
              even in diamonds, as this silenced North for the time being. When 
              East introduced her eight-card suit South could not really take 
              any action on her own, so there it rested. Just made, Bertheau +420. 
             
              
| Closed Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Dechelette | Magnusson | Lemaitre | Midskog |  
                |  |  |  | Pass |  
| Pass | 1NT | 4ª | 4NT |  
| Pass | 5§ | Pass | 6§ (!?) |  
| Dble | All Pass |  |  |  Here EW did not have any gadget available, so once again West went 
              into the bushes first. North opened a slightly off-shape 1 NT and, 
              of course, East cleared the smoke. But now, South could show her 
              twosuiter easily so the good save was found. For reasons we cannot 
              reveal (but would we like to?) South bid one more at her next turn, 
              so West came forward out of the bushes to throw an axe. That was 
              +300 to Lemaitre, but still another 3-IMP loss. They had gone out 
              by 15. Over now to the other close match. Though we have to skip all the 
              boards they played in the second half, there still was work to do 
              for them as they were the teams to follow the Laws of Statistics 
              right till the bitter end. One would suspect that, with 24 matches 
              on, at least one of them would end in an exact tie (as you will 
              probably know, the chances are better than even that in a group 
              of 25 people two will celebrate their birthdays on the same date). According to the Tiebreak Regulations four more boards would be 
              played, followed (if necessary) by all sorts of Silver and Golden 
              Goals. Here is the first of those four boards from extra-time, and 
              it set the tone:
 
             
              
| Board 17. Dealer North None Vul. |  
|  | ª Q 10 8 7 5 © 8 7 4 3
 ¨ J 5
 § 7 2
 |  ª 2 © 10 9 6
 ¨ A K 9 7
 § A K J 4 3
 |  | ª J 6 4 3 © Q J
 ¨ Q 8 6 4 3 2
 § 6
 | 
|  | ª A K 9 © A K 5 2
 ¨ 10
 § Q 10 9 8 5
 |  
             
              
| Open Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Cedolin | Jansma | Canesi | Van Ettinger |  
                |  | Pass | 3¨ | Dble |  
| 5¨ | Pass | Pass | Dble |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  In second seat, 3¨would not be everybody’s choice, but had 
              the EW hands fitted well, the contract would have been unbeatable. 
              As it was, 5¨ went down one with no game on for NS, as their hands 
              did not fit too well either, obviously. So first blood to Bar, +100. 
             
              
| Closed Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Herbst | Matricardi | Bar | Corchia |  
                |  | Pass | Pass | 1§ |  
| Pass | 1¨ | Pass | 1© |  
| 2§ | All Pass |  |  |  In this room, the 1¨ negative response to the multi-purpose 1§ 
              showed just less than 8 hcp, so everyone was in the dark. When North 
              considered his hand not worth a raise to 2© it had to rest at 2§. 
              North pass probably was justified, as he will end up as dummy in 
              4© if he bids. So far, so good. Another matter is defending 2§. As you can see, the 1¨ negative 
              had had the distinct advantage of eating up the opponents’ 
              suit, but how to exploit it? The solution is to discard your two 
              small hearts on the run of the diamonds. A heart was led to the 
              king and South returned a trump won by Ilan Herbst with the Jack. 
              He cashed two more top trumps and started playing on diamonds. Now, 
              if South keeps the third spade, declarer cannot establish his third 
              heart and cash it too. At the table the contract was made, so Bar 
              scored another +90 for a useful first 5 IMP’s. After a push on board 18 this was the third extra time exercise: 
             
              
| Board 19. Dealer South East-West Vul. |  
|  | ª J 8 2 © A K 3
 ¨ 8 5 2
 § A Q J 2
 |  ª K 10 9 7 6 4 © 5
 ¨ Q 7 3
 § 8 7 4
 |  | ª Q 5 © Q J 8 4
 ¨ A J 10 6
 §  6 5 3
 | 
|  | ª A 3 © 10 9 7 6 2
 ¨ K 9 4
 § K 10 9
 |  
             
              
| Open Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Cedolin | Jansma | Canesi | Van Ettinger |  
                |  |  |  | Pass |  
| 2¨ | Dble | 2ª | 3© |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  Well, one might say that NS missed a game here. With the hearts 
              3-2 and the ¨A right it would have been an easy make. Elisabeth 
              van Ettinger must have felt very, very relieved seeing the real 
              distribution, but with all the opponents’ noise around, this 
              was not really a surprise any more, one might say... Bar +140. 
             
              
| Closed Room: |  
| West | North | East | South |  
| Herbst | Matricardi | Bar | Corchia |  
                |  |  |  | Pass |  
| Pass | 1NT | Pass | 2¨ |  
| Pass | 2© | Pass | 3NT |  
| All Pass |  |  |  |  With no opposing bidding NS sort of automatically ended up in game. 
              Please note that 3NT is even worse than 4©: both contracts need 
              a 3-2 heart break and the ¨A right, but 3 NT also needs short diamonds 
              with the long hearts (or with West’s ©Q, for that matter). 
              So this adventure got what it deserved, looking at the statistical 
              odds: one down. Bar +50 and another 5 IMP’s  And so it went on. On the last board, Bar played a partscore on 
              a combined holding of 25 hcp and Canesi were in 3 NT. Needless to 
              say that the defender with the established suit also held the essential 
              ace declarer was missing… So the extra time produced a score of 17-0 to Bar, who thus emerged 
              a little lucky winners. Bridge is a cruel game… |