Israel vs Poland
Open Round 34
The first match on VuGraph, Friday morning, was the Israel v. Poland
encounter. Israel were out of contention for the top five spot,
except if a number of miracles would occur, and Poland were in 5th
position, 16 V.P. ahead of Sweden and thus by no means safely booked
for Bali. As both teams had been doing well during these weeks,
another good match was in sight and so it proved.
After five boards, Poland led 5-0 on overtricks but then Israel
struck in a peculiar way:
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª K 2
© A K 7 6 4
¨ A J 7 5 4 3
§ - |
ª Q 3
© Q J 3
¨ K 8 6
§ K Q 8 5 3 |
|
ª A 10 9 7 5 4
© 10 9 5 2
¨ -
§ 10 9 7 |
|
ª J 8 6
© 8
¨ Q 10 9 2
§ A J 6 4 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
2NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
As 2NT showed the two lower of the remaining suits, 4©, a forward-going
move for sure, might well have become the final contract. There
is much to say for a direct jump to 6¨ over 4¨, but in the end the
Israelis landed on their feet for a fine +920.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
In the Closed Room, Balicki was lucky to at all get a second chance
of showing a suit. As Zmudzinski could not possibly be aware of
partner's exact distribution, slam was out of the question for him.
Poland thus only mustered +420 and lost 11 IMPs.
§¨©ª
In the Romania v. Liechenstein match, one North also decided to
overcall 1©. When East felt he did not have enough points to introduce
his spades, North played there and just made 7 tricks
ª©¨§
The next board saw Poland come back to 8-11 on an extra undertrick
but then, three consecutive boards swung the match Israel's way:
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª 7 5
© A K 6 3
¨ Q 10 5 2
§ K 4 3 |
ª K J 8 3
© 9 4 2
¨ A 8 3
§ J 10 8 |
|
ª A Q 10 2
© Q J 8
¨ 9 7
§ A Q 9 5 |
|
ª 9 6 4
© 10 7 5
¨ K J 6 4
§ 7 6 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
Pass |
1¨ |
Dble |
2¨ |
2ª |
3¨ |
3ª |
All Pass |
Sensible non-vulnerable bidding with both East and West holding
a little in reserve. Poland +170.
Please note the daring 3¨ by Kalish. This might have gone three
off had someone doubled it, but as it was, it changed the meaning
of 3ª from invitational into more competitive.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
With the §K well-placed, as could be expected from North's opening
bid, and with all the club intermediates present, this contract
was no problem at all and in fact better than 4ª as the latter might
go down on a heart ruff had the layout been different. The Polish
Club did not work well here, as Zmudzinski could not compete like
his Israeli counterpart did as South. Israel +400 and 6 IMPs.
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª J 8 7 4 3 2
© 8 4
¨ A
§ K 4 3 2 |
ª A 5
© K 10 6 2
¨ Q J 10 6 4
§ A 10 |
|
ª Q 10 9 6
© A Q 7 5 3
¨ 9 5 3
§ 5 |
|
ª K
© J 9
¨ K 8 7 2
§ Q J 9 8 7 6 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
As the club fit never came to light after the spade Multi, the
Poles were allowed to play an undisturbed 4© for +650.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
Pass |
Pass |
2§ |
2¨ |
4ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
Here, North did not open his unpromising spade suit, so Zmudzinski
opened a natural 2§. When West overcalled 2¨ only and Balicki introduced
his spades, the VuGraph audience thought this should imply a club
fit as North had not opened. When North surprisingly passed, the
Poles lost 800 and 4 IMPs instead of going down only 300 for an
8-IMP gain. Israel 21-8 up now.
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª 7 5
© K 10 9 5 4
¨ 8 6 5
§ K 5 3 |
ª K 9
© A 6
¨ A K 7 2
§ A J 10 7 2 |
|
ª Q J 10 6 2
© Q J 7
¨ Q 10 9 4
§ Q |
|
ª A 8 4 3
© 8 3 2
¨ J 3
§ 9 8 6 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Holding only queens and jacks, Lesniewski could not find any good
forward-going bid popposite his partner's minor suit reverse. He
might have been well off in settling for 3NT, as 6¨ by East will
go down on a heart lead, and probably on many other leads as well.
Poland +660.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
The Israeli natural auction placed the declaration in the West
hand. North now had to lead, and had he selected a trump the contract
might still have gone down. As EW had not clearly shown their heart
control, Balicki led the ©10 which immediately paved the way to
12 tricks: four spades, two hearts, five diamonds and the §A. In
view of the auction a lucky, but also a deserved swing to Israel
who increased their lead to 33-8.
The Poles hit back with a successful partscore on both tables to
score 6 IMPs, but then the Israelis showed good defence:
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª A K 6
© Q J 8
¨ 10 7 6 3
§ 7 6 3 |
ª J 2
© K 10 7 6 5 4 3
¨ 9 2
§ A J |
|
ª 10 9 8
© A 9 2
¨ 8 4
§ K Q 5 4 2 |
|
ª Q 7 5 4 3
© -
¨ A K Q J 5
§ 10 9 8 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
2© |
2ª |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
On a trump lead, Kalish made ten tricks in peace, Israel +170.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
3© |
3ª |
4§ |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
With the hearts 3-0, a club lead is vital to give the defence
any chance at all. Michael Barel did find the §A
lead and continued the suit. For Aviram is was then easy to
see that the ªJ
or better with his partner would defeat the contract, so he
played the 4th round of clubs, which West duly ruffed with
the jack. Well done, one down, Israel +50 and 6 IMPs more:
39-14 now.
This is where it still stood when the last board nearly halved
the Israeli advantage:
|
|
BAREL Michael, Israel
|
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª A
© Q
¨ 10 9 7 6 2
§ Q 10 8 6 5 2 |
ª K 5 2
© 8 7 6 5 2
¨ K
§ K 9 7 4 |
|
ª Q 10 9 4
© A 10 3
¨ J 8 4 3
§ J 3 |
|
ª J 8 7 6 3
© K J 9 4
¨ A Q 5
§ A |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
A wild 2NT for minors opening in 2nd position, vulnerable, by North
led to a bold jump to game by South. Nobody was nasty enough to
double this so the costs were only 400.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
A quiet natural auction brought the Poles in a more sensible contract
which was made when Balicki correctly played the §Q from hand at
the second round of trumps, felling the jack. Poland another +110
and 11 IMPs.
The final score: 39-27 to Israel, 17-13 V.P.
Poland had lost, but their chances of qualifying were not yet really
in danger.
|