The invisible match
Poland v. Norway
Open Round 6
Though some imprudent onlooker caused a major internal network
breakdown, we are still able to present some of the highlights from
the invisible Rama match on Monday evening. Poland were playing
Norway, so many of us would have hoped to see two eventual qualifiers
at work. It was not to be, but here is a small anthology from what
happened.
The first board on Vugraph was this one.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 7
© K J 5
¨ A 10 7 4 3
§ 9 2 |
ª Q 9
© 9 8 6 3
¨ K 9 6 2
§ K 7 4 |
|
ª K 6 5 4 3
© 10 7
¨ J 8 5
§ Q J 10 |
|
ª J 8 2
© A Q 4 2
¨ Q
§ A 8 6 5 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
|
|
|
1§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
On Vugraph, West led a heart and thus declarer had time to establish
the clubs as the spade switch came too late. A diamond switch does
not beat the contract either. Poland +400.
It was pointed out by the commentators that the only realistic
chance to beat 3NT was a spade lead. Thus, the contract had to be
played from the North seat.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
|
|
|
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
East led a spade and that was it. Poland +50 and straight off the
mark with 10 IMPs.
Next, we have to dwell on the theme of doubled partscores. Surprisingly
enough, most of the substantial swings in this match were caused
by this phenomenon. Maybe that's why the network broke down
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª Q 10 2
© Q 4
¨ K 9 4
§ A K 10 5 3 |
ª A
© A 10 3
¨ J 10 8 7 6 3 2
§ 9 2 |
|
ª 8 7 4 3
© K 8 7 6 5 2
¨ A 5
§ 8 |
|
ª K J 9 6 5
© J 9
¨ Q
§ Q J 7 6 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
|
|
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
As EW are pretty cold for 4© (or even 5©) going down two undoubled
for 200 looked good for Poland. So it proved, but in unexpected
fashion:
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
The true nature of South's double was not picked up to its full
extent by North, so the Poles reached their game very quickly. Eleven
tricks could not be prevented, so instead of conceding 450 the Norwegians
lost 670 or 10 IMPs instead of 6.
The Norwegians would have to suffer more ignominy of the same kind
near the end of the match, on two successive boards:
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª J 7
© A 6 3 2
¨ 5 3
§ K Q 5 3 2 |
ª 6 5
© Q J 7 4
¨ Q J 6 2
§ A 7 6 |
|
ª A Q 10 3 2
© K 8 5
¨ 7 4
§ J 10 9 |
|
ª K 9 8 4
© 10 9
¨ A K 10 9 8
§ 8 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Dble |
Pass |
2¨ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
When West led a trump away from his QJxx, declarer had time to
establish the clubs and make an overtrick. Poland +280.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
Pass |
1§ |
1ª |
2NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
A spade went to the 10 and kingand a club was taken with dummy's
king. Next, declarer ducked a diamond to West, but when Zmudzinski
next found the heart switch, it was all over. Down three, another
150 to Poland for 10 IMPs on what looked an innocent partscore hand.
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª J 7 2
© 4 3
¨ J 4 3
§ A Q 8 5 2 |
ª A K 10 9 4
© 9 2
¨ A 7
§ J 10 6 3 |
|
ª Q 8 3
© K Q 8 6 5
¨ 9 8 6 2
§ 9 |
|
ª 6 5
© A J 10 7
¨ K Q 10 5
§ K 7 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
1ª |
2§ |
Dble |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
3§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
As Martens was sure of the five-card support he could compete once
more. The double and the fall of the §9 meant he had to lose just
two spades, a heart and a diamond for his contract. Poland +470
this time.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2§ |
3© |
Pass |
A nice fitbid by East, but the bad heart break meant 3¨ was already
too high. When the defenders switched to trumps after being given
the first trick in diamonds eight tricks were the maximum. So Norway
+50, but 9 more IMPs to Poland.
With the doubled partscore stories from this match exhausted, it's
time to turn our attention to the swings Norway got. In spite of
all the hands reported about above, the final score of the match
was 39-35 or 16-14 V.P. only to Poland, so there must have been
a few
A strange swing to Norway occurred on board 5. The scorecards of
the match informed us that in one room 2ª had gone down, but that
in the other room they had made 4ª. What happened?
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª K 8 7 4 3
© Q 5
¨ 6
§ K J 7 5 4 |
ª A 10 6
© 10 8 6 2
¨ K Q 7
§ Q 6 3 |
|
ª Q 5 2
© K 3
¨ A J 10 8 3 2
§ 10 2 |
|
ª J 9
© A J 9 7 4
¨ 9 5 4
§ A 9 8 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
|
2ª |
All Pass |
|
2ª showed the twosuiter and Lesniewski got the favourable lead
of the ©K. Now he decided to go for a safety line, cashing his top
tricks first and then hoping to make enough trump tricks with the
additional strength of dummy's jack-nine. This line would have worked,
but no longer when the heat in the playing room induced him to forget
about cashing the ©Q. Norway +100.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
|
1ª |
2¨ |
Dble |
2NT |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Dble |
4§ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
This contract was much more ambitious and on a diamond lead and
continuation it looks as if declarer will be fatally shortened very
quickly. But the defence have to be alert. Balicki led the ¨A and
continued the suit, declarer ruffing. Now the heart finesse was
taken successfully and the ªJ called for. West has to rise with
the ace and continue diamonds; if he does not, he will be out of
diamonds when he gets the lead with the ªA and declarer thus will
make his contract. As this is exactly what happened, the mysteries
of this hand are revealed. Norway another +620 when the club finesse
also worked. 12 useful IMPs back to them.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª A K 7 4
© Q 4 3 2
¨ K J 5 2
§ A |
ª -
© A J 10 5
¨ A 10 8 6
§ K Q J 10 4 |
|
ª Q J 6
© K 9
¨ 9 7 3
§ 9 8 7 5 3 |
|
ª 10 9 8 5 3 2
© 8 7 6
¨ Q 4
§ 6 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Helgemo |
Lesniewski |
Helness |
Martens |
|
|
|
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
Easy enough after Helness' jump. Norway +750.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Sælensminde |
Balicki |
Brogeland |
|
|
|
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Dble |
3§ |
3¨ |
4§ |
All Pass |
|
|
As Balicki could not be so sure about the meaning of 1§, he did
not feel free to jump. This suddenly made it much more difficult
to reach game
Poland +150 and 12 IMPs to Norway again. Balance
had been restored.
|