| A 
              little bit of chatting with Dano De Falco   
              
                |  Dano 
                    de Falco |  | Dear Dano, who is going to win this 
                    championship? Among the favourites, in my opinion, 
                    are first of all Jassem-Tuszynski, whom we played in 
                    the finals of the recent Olympiad. 
                    That way, we saw at the table their aggressive and winning 
                    style of bridge.  Another pair in contention are the defending 
                    champions, Levy-Chemla, who, as World Masters, can 
                    skip the qualification rounds. There is one more pair from 
                    France that I like: Mari-Faigenbaum. Here we have two 
                    specialist pairs tournament players, who already have won 
                    important events.  I do not know the whole field from abroad, 
                    but as far as the Italians are concerned I can only say that 
                    our two leading pairs, Bocchi-Duboin and Lauria-Versace 
                    are missing, because they are participating in a National 
                    in the U.S.A. Especially Bocchi-Duboin, second in the 
                    previous issue in Warsaw, would have been in with a very good 
                    chance. This means that the home pair with the most titles 
                    are we, Ferraro and myself, but we are not really pairs 
                    tournament specialists. For us, playing here is more like 
                    another good training opportunity for the big team events 
                    to come. |  
                |  |  |  |  Why do you personally prefer the team events? Well, to be frank, I do not feel at all disturbed 
              to tell you that I detest pairs tournaments, though I have to admit 
              that they also bring forward specific qualities (such as a sense 
              of timing and living dangerously) that are useful in any event. 
              Still, it is a fundamentally different game in which every now and 
              again we see pairs coming forward who seem to be ready-made for 
              this type of stress. What do you think of the venue? It is amazing, you will not easily find a 
              panorama like this anywhere else. However, it is also a sort of 
              going up and down all the time, and for me, a lazy person who prefers 
              to have everything at the same floor without stairs, it might be 
              a little bit of a problem. Another subject: do you like to play "on 
              line?" Yes, for sure. At home, at ease, from my favourite 
              chair, in dressing gowns. One last question. What has been, in your 
              bridge career, your most pleasing victory and your bitterest defeat? The nicest victory was the Europeans 
              1999 in Malta. We were overcoming a difficult situation of 
              having to build up a new team, with new pairs lacking in both partnership 
              and international experience. It turned out to be such an overwhelming 
              victory that it gave me more satisfaction, even more than the one 
              in the recent Olympiad where I felt less involved. The bitterest defeats were two: the first 
              was the Bermuda Bowl in Rio de Janeiro 1979, 
              where the Americans beat us by a few points after we came back tremendously 
              well. The second, harsh and bitter too, was in Stockholm. Here, 
              we were World Champions with one board to play, but as a serult 
              of a misunderstanding between two of the best players the world 
              has seen, beyond any argument, Garozzo and Belladonna, we 
              saw vanish a title we had in the pocket already, we thought. |